― CRW (CRW), Sunday, 11 April 2004 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 11 April 2004 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Sunday, 11 April 2004 15:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Sunday, 11 April 2004 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 15 April 2004 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Friday, 16 April 2004 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)
The only "classic" '70's "X"-certer I've seen is Emanuelle (sp?) which as you probably know, is a really terrible film.
I suspect w/this, as w/other things, your tastes and mine differ, I mean if you were to name a movie w/good fucking in it, I'd probably say "The Piano", or maybe "The Lover" at a push, you know?
I just remembered, I have seen Lydia Lunch's entire cinematic ouvre, and some nick zedd films, haha, haha, haha.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 16 April 2004 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)
I have yet to see any hard porn that is erotic. I guess when Constance Money finally gets naked during the last ten minutes of the otherwise crap "Opening of Misty Beethoven" there is some erotic value (based on the looks of the girl on show rather than the actual sex which is, if memory serves me correctly, quite brief).
Russ Meyer's films are awful - boring, dull, turgid rubbish with women sporting oversized, unnatractive boobs.
Mainstream films that are erotic - well Sylvia Kristel always did it for me, but you are right in saying the first Emmanuelle is not so good. The second is an improvement though, and at least these are films with something resembling a plot and the soft focus photography and decent acting (by the standards of the genre) make them a cut above. "The Lover" is toss, "The Piano" is a fine film but not what I'd call erotic. "9 and a Half Weeks" is probably the closest to that.
― CRW (CRW), Friday, 16 April 2004 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)
I googled "Russ Meyer", and found this:
Russ Meyer is considered by most critics to be one of America’s few cinematic auteurs. This lofty title is usually reserved for the likes of Bergman or Felini. However, after six decades of great film making, Meyer has more than earned it.
I dunno, its ludicrous hyperbole made me laugh anyway - "most" critics? eh... I like "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!! and (especially) "Beyond the valley of the dolls", but the rest of it is shit, as far as I've seen. I didn't much like "9 1/2 weeks" b/c i find mickey rourke annoying. Likewise val kilmer, as it happens, so i doubt i'll be seeing "wonderland" (i assume this is the val k vehicle abt j holmes)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 16 April 2004 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)
It was William Goldman who (with much sarcasm) noted Meyer was an "autuer". In the broadest sense of the word, yes he is, because he does all the technical side of things himself. Still don't like his work though.
― CRW (CRW), Friday, 16 April 2004 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Friday, 16 April 2004 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 16 April 2004 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)