Cannes 2004

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Yes, I know it's become just another politicized smoozefest, but look at this lineup!

 
La Mala Educacion (Bad Education) Directed by Pedró Almodovar
De-Lovely Directed by Irwin Winkler
2046 Directed by Wong Kar-wai
Clean Directed by Olivier Assayas
Comme Une Image Directed by Agnès Jaoui
Diarios de Motocicleta (The Motorcycle Diaries) Directed by Walter Salles
The Edukators Directed by Hans Weingartner
Exils Directed by Tony Gatlif
Fahrenheit 911 Directed by Michael Moore
Innocence Directed by Oshii Mamoru
The Woman Is The Future of Man Directed by Hong Sang-soo
La Niña Santa Directed by Lucrecia Martel
Le Conseguenze dell'amore Directed by Paolo Sorrentino
Nobody Knows Directed by Hirokazu Kore-Eda
Old Boy Directed by Park Chan-wook
Shrek 2 Directed by Andrew Adamson
The Ladykillers Directed by Joel Coen and Ethan Coen
The Life and Death of Peter Sellers Directed by Stephen Hopkins
Tropical Malady Directed by Apichatpong Weerasethakul
Zivot je Cudo Directed by Emir Kusturica
10E Chambre Instants D'Audiences (The 10th District Courts - Moments of Trials) Directed by Raymond Depardon
The Gate of the Sun Directed by Yousry Nasrallah
Bad Santa Directed by Terry Zwigoff
Cinéastes À Tout Pri Directed by Frederic Sojcher
Dawn of the Dead Directed by Zack Snyder
Five Directed by Abbas Kiarostami
Glauber the Film, Labyrinth of Brazil Directed by Silvio Tendler
Kill Bill, Volume 2 Directed by Quentin Tarantino
Henri Langlois the Phantom of the Cinematheque
Directed by Jacques Richard
Mondovino Directed by Jonathan Nossiter
Notre Musique Directed by Jean-Luc Godard
Salvador Allende Directed by Patricio Guzman
House of Flying Daggers Directed by Yimou Zhang
Troy Directed by Wolfgang Petersen
I Died in Childhood Directed by Georgiy Paradjanov
Z Channel: A Magnificent Obsession Directed by Xan Cassavetes

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Friday, 14 May 2004 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)

when will 2046 get shown?

ryan (ryan), Saturday, 15 May 2004 00:43 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, Troy and dawn of the Dead would be less out-of-place in the competition line-up than Ladykillers and Shrek 2.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 15 May 2004 04:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, I can't help but wonder if the heavy publicizing of Moore-Miramax's difficulty with 911 and Disney isn't phase one in their battle plan to get a high-profile lefty festival prize. (Phase two has Harvey pinning QT against the wall outside the jury room.)

Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 15 May 2004 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)

My must-see list:

2046
Clean
Fahrenheit 911 (despite the publicity stunts)
Old Boy
Shrek 2
The Life and Death of Peter Sellers
Tropical Malady
House of Flying Daggers

There's also supposed to be a sequel to Ghost in the Shell, but that's out of competition perhaps?

Anthony (Anthony F), Saturday, 15 May 2004 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, the "controversy" over the new Moore film is more than likely a publicity stunt. even if it's not, it's the same thing with every new film he makes, so it's just starting to get old.

regardless, i'm glad Moore is still making these films, and I'm pretty confident that his own personal sense of fulfillment comes from spreading the message than in $$$$. He's really nothing short of a miracle for the left, an intelligent liberal who can use humor and media to appeal to the masses. God knows that doesn't apply to many of them--Chomsky? Nader? Zinn? Not likely to gain mass appeal or get a crowd laughing.

And when you really get down to it, it's just so redeeming to see a little fat guy making some stiff-suited CEO look like the bumbling jackass scumbag that he is.

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Saturday, 15 May 2004 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)

is moore or the CEO supposed to look like the bumbling jackass scumbag?

ryan (ryan), Saturday, 15 May 2004 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)

(i should add i have never made it to the end of a Moore movie so my opinion means nothing)

ryan (ryan), Saturday, 15 May 2004 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't get all the anti-Moore hysteria. I don't necessarily agree with him all the time, and some of the things he says and does outside the cinema are a bit questionable. But c'mon, how can you not root for the guy? He's this pudgy little mountain man who looks like he should be shooting empty cans while knocking back a couple of cold ones, but the guy is punk rock to the core. He'll say and do anything he feels regardless of who he pisses off, and for me, that more than redeems his inflated ego.

Anthony (Anthony F), Saturday, 15 May 2004 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i dont know--like i said i am not the person to debate this since i have actually avoided most of his work--but while i see where you are coming from i get the impression that his image is pretty carefully constructed.

i'll bow out now.

is The Motorcycle Diaries the one about Che Guevera?

ryan (ryan), Saturday, 15 May 2004 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

"I don't get all the anti-Moore hysteria. I don't necessarily agree with him all the time, and some of the things he says and does outside the cinema are a bit questionable."

Anthony, what do you find "questionable?" I can't imagine Moore antics for promotion are any more dubious or tasteless than the bullshit that ad execs for the big money studio flicks pull. And considering how ridiculously right of center the American media and movie industry seem to be heading (Fox News? Passion of Christ?) it's completely necessary.

Moore seems to be simply using the right-wing's most powerful tool--big mouthed, loud flashy simpleton rhetoric--against them. Sure the guy can sound like a pompous windbag sometimes, but have you ever listened to Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reily? At least Moore's tirades are erudite and disciplined to some degree, unlike the idiotic racist & sexist banter that emerges from the likes of the right-wingers.

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Sunday, 16 May 2004 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Jay, you're right. His antics and style aren't much different from ad execs, or the John Stossels of the capitalist world. That's a big part of my problem with him.

I want my side to be represented by someone better than the assholes I despise.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Monday, 17 May 2004 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, I can't help but wonder if the heavy publicizing of Moore-Miramax's difficulty with 911 and Disney isn't phase one in their battle plan to get a high-profile lefty festival prize. (Phase two has Harvey pinning QT against the wall outside the jury room.)
-- Eric H. (ephende...), May 15th, 2004 12:48 AM.

Bow to me, for this is surely what has happened.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 22 May 2004 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

That's the movie business for you.

"I want my side to be represented by someone better than the assholes I despise. "

So do I, Milo, but the simple truth of the matter is that loudmouths and self-promoters are the ones who get heard by the mainstream. the way i look at it is, which is the greater evil--someone using bad tactics to promote an ideology that I believe in, or not having that ideology promoted at all?

jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Sunday, 23 May 2004 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Being a loudmouth self-promoter doesn't equate to Moore's shady actions, though.

I'd disagree with your dichotomy there - there are other ways, and maybe the key isn't making one big play for the culture-at-large but nibbling at the edges and building power (ultimately more effective in the long-run). But given your dichotomy, I'll take the latter. At least that doesn't have the potential to do more harm than good to the ideology/movement, as Moore's Bowling for Columbine stunts did. The only people that appealed to or engaged positively were people who already held its beliefs, it either didn't engage or turned off the rest of the population.

(Possibly a major problem with American left-of-center thinking, rarely looks at the long-run, too focused on the immediate. The arch-conservatives built a movement over decades and look where it's gotten them)

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 23 May 2004 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)

What does everybody think of the results? I was really surprised by a few of the awards -- never imagined a Tarantino-led jury would give an award to the Thai director (I won't even attempt to spell his name). His last film was REALLY tough going -- minimalistic to the max. Sounds like this one is more of the same.

Also surprised that Gatlif won for best director. I HATED Gadjo Dillo and Latcho Drom.

THRILLED about Old Boy, as I wrote HERE. It annoyed me how the French press attacked the film. They were lazy and sloppy reviews, that didn't even attempt to look at the film other than an action film. I've got a review HERE as well.

BabyBuddha (BabyBuddha), Sunday, 23 May 2004 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.