what the FUCK [clemens to boston????]

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://p086.ezboard.com/fsonsofsamhornbostonredsox.showMessage?topicID=13903.topic

why wouldn't the yankees have put in a claim???

i wouldn't put this past clemens. god what an unbelievable, shameless ass.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

well apparently he was placed on waivers, all the way down to boston (who of course have priority over the yanks), was finally claimed, pulled back, but now the 'stros are trying to work out a deal w/ them. so he didn't clear (which would've made NO sense) but he DID get past anaheim and etc.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)

ok now there's this comforting post from someone who knows more about the waiver process than i:


If they pulled him back, then a trade can't happen. The Astros would have to put him on waivers again and this time waivers would irrevocable. Once somebody claimed him he would be gone with no option to trade him or pull him back.

Hard to see the Astros making that kind of move.

Either Lobel or Lupica is wrong about something.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

back the truck up, is there any official word on the Astros releasing Clemens?

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

ok maybe that's not so comforting. i read it as once claimed on regular waivers, you have to EITHER let him go for nothing OR pull him back. but apparently he's saying if lupica is correct that the astros pulled him back, then the sox would've had to put him on irrevocable waivers IN WHICH CASE they would have no option to negotiate a trade.

so fuck.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)

was this the same thing boston did with manny?

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 19 August 2004 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry i'm rambling terribly obviously.

um, let's see, boston put manny on irrevocable waivers yes. but there's no indication that that's what the astros did to clemens- the Story is that the astros put him on waivers, he got claimed by boston and boston only (the other teams, which would, now that i think about it, actually be EVERYONE but NYY [who don't matter since the sox have priority over them], passed) and the astros are working out a big deal with the sox.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Doesn't the waiver wire usually see tonnes of big names, just as a way for GMs to gauge interest in future trades?

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, i think so. it's not about clemens being put on waivers, it's about a rumor that boston claimed him and the astros DID NOT pull him back but instead elected to attempt to negotiate a trade w/ the sox.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

who would the Sox give up for Clemens?

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)

no idea, probably like youkilis and shoppach or something. it would have to be a lot. i hope.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)

How do no-trade clauses work with waiver trades? Does Clemens even have one?

mattbot (mattbot), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)

you would think. i'm sure the astros are doing this with his blessing whatever the case.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

And what about his stupid family time?

I really dislike Clemens, and he's never even played for a team I follow closely.

mattbot (mattbot), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

he's a really terrible human being.

i'm surfing the various message boards, and no one has a clue what's going on in any way at any level, basically.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

From mlb.com:

The principal difference in engineering trades going forward is this: a player can be dealt only after passing through waivers, essentially exposed to the other teams in reverse order of the standings.

Waiver lists, incidentally, are a regular, everyday part of baseball.

Throughout the season, players -- even headliners -- routinely and quietly go on waiver lists. It is an easy way for a team to gauge interest in certain players, perhaps setting in motion subsequent trade talks, since they can simply be withdrawn from the list if there is a claim.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Nothing that hasn't been alluded to in this thread, but the article kind of spells a few issues that have been causing headscratching.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

"a player can be dealt only after passing through waivers"

!!!

i hope that's right. apparently a lot of people think otherwise. there's no fucking way clemens could've slipped past the yankees...right?

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

or does he just mean that a player has to be PLACED ON waivers? does "passing through" = "clearing"? and what does he mean by dealt??

what the fuck. i've actually been experiencing (for no apparent reason) a not-seen-in-years calm about the yankees the past week or so and then i log onto that sox board and see this staring me in the face.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Jayson Stark's recent ESPN article is helpful.

# If a player isn't claimed by any team in either league, he can be traded until the end of the month to anyone.

# If a player is claimed, but only by one team, the player can be traded only to the team that claims him.

# If a player is claimed by more than one team, the club with the worst record in that player's league gets priority -- and the player can be traded only to that team.

So even if the Yanks put in a claim on him, they have a better record than the Bosox and don't have priority on Clemens.

mattbot (mattbot), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)

yeahbut...it's complicated.

so stark is saying you can work out a trade even if a player doesn't clear waivers. so this rumor is still on.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 19 August 2004 22:35 (twenty-one years ago)

dead.

supposedly the sox wouldn't give up youkilis.

John (jdahlem), Friday, 20 August 2004 02:19 (twenty-one years ago)

John I'm going to go cook big sausages and think about how awesome your last post is

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 21 August 2004 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.