Useless Stats -- most wins vs. closers

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
From Jason Stark's column on ESPN today ... I'm not sure if there's any significance to any of this, but it's fun to think about.


Stat of the month
This week's fun stat is: Most Wins Vs. Closers.

We recognize this is an inexact science, since some teams' closers have changed from week to week or month to month. But to qualify, we used this arbitrary definition: the opposing closer had to be the losing pitcher. We can calculate blown saves against each team some other time.

AMERICAN LEAGUE

Twins 8
Yankees 6
Rangers, Indians, Tigers, White Sox, Royals, Blue Jays 3

NATIONAL LEAGUE

Cardinals 6
Giants 5
Cubs 5
Phillies, Pirates, Rockies 4

At the other end of this scale, the Expos and Mariners haven't won any games against the opposing team's closers. And the Dodgers and Astros are among the teams that have done that just once.

File this away for future October reference: The Red Sox are the only team that has beaten Mariano Rivera. The Yankees and Twins both have wins over Keith Foulke. And the Marlins and Braves have wins over Eric Gagne.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 9 September 2004 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Bonds has 2 HRs off Gagne this year.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 10 September 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)

6 games left SF vs. LA too.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 10 September 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

five months pass...
Thought-provoking article from THT about how the best relievers on the team are not always brought in with the game on the line... that modern-day "closers" are mostly utilized at the top of the 9th with no one on base.

...a closer is two-and-a-half times more likely to be brought into the ninth with a three-run lead (75% of the time) than with the score tied (30% of the time).

Three-run leads are gimme situations; fans are heading to the exits. On the other hand, tie games in the ninth are the epitome of crucial situations. Yet most managers would rather use their closer with a three-run lead. What gives?

As Steve Treder documented so well last year, the save statistic has warped the way we think of critical situations. Instead of using closers in the most critical situations, managers use their closers in order to maximize their saves and not the team wins.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 28 February 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Instead of using closers in the most critical situations, managers use their closers in order to maximize their saves and not the team wins.

I'm not sure I agree with this. The "%age of Time the Closer is Used" line tracks the P-distribution for run differentials less than or equal to 1. In other words, managers do understand that tie games -- and even games when they're down by one run -- are situations for using the closer even though they aren't save situations. (hmm ... so why does that logic always seem to be abandoned by managers come playoff time? Anyhow ...)

It's clear that closers are overused in two or three run differential situations. Pitching the closer doesn't really compromise the game's outcome, but the closer gets a save.

It would have been interesting if he'd normalized the data by # of appearances. That is, closers were used in 80% of the games with a three-run differential and 80% of those with a one-run differential. But surely there are more one-run games than three-run games? In other words, exactly what fraction of an average closers' 70-80 appearances are "wasted" on high run differential situations?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 28 February 2005 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)

(this could be inferred by looking at a closer's average P value, but what we really want to see is the distribution of P values for that closer)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 28 February 2005 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)

"Math is hard."

Barbie (Begs2Differ), Monday, 28 February 2005 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Gagne last season did seem to be not nearly as effective once Mota was dealt away, he seemed to have problems when having to work more than an inning.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Now, I realize that this sounds totally Morb-like, but WTF is a guy doing talking about MVP candidates in early March???!?

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Fish gotta swim, Dave.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

three years pass...

i'm pretty appalled that people are talking about k-rod for mvp, which i assume is because of the likelihood that he will break the single season saves record (as if breaking a record held by bobby thigpen is indicative of "best player of the year" or something).

omar little, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 16:59 (seventeen years ago)

Twelve saves in a month and a half isn't a sure thing, but you're right, he's been at best the fourth or fifth best closer in the league this year. And since the best starters this year aren't on playoff-bound teams, he'll probably get a lot of support for the Cy Young award.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

hmmm, I brought this up last week and no one had heard K-Rod MVP talk!

If Cliff Lee wins 20 and the Indians stay below .500, he has a decent shot. But yeah, the Cro-Magnon writers will be hard-pressed to ignore a RECORD no matter how meaningless.

(otoh, Thigpen finished 4th when he saved 57, but the 3 guys ahead of him all won 20)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:24 (seventeen years ago)

i'm still confused as to why teams bring in their best relievers at the beginning of the 9th inning rather than bringing them in when the other team has runners on base in a close game even if it's in the 7th or 8th inning

ciderpress, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

xp: I'm mixing Cy & MVP... isn't the Josh Hamilton "story" along w/ 130+ RBI likely to make him the prohibitive MVP favorite?

All of us who remember pre-Eckersley are confused too, ciderpress.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)

it's not as dramatic to bring trevor hoffmann in to hell's bells in the top of the 7th (i'm kind of not kidding)

omar little, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago)

And since the best starters this year aren't on playoff-bound teams,

Jon Danks! Jon Lester! Joe Saunders! #4, 5, and 7 in AL VORP!

David R., Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:30 (seventeen years ago)

oz (md): al mvp?

Rob Neyer: In the absence of a great candidate on one of the contending teams, don't be surprised if Josh Hamilton or even Francisco Rodriguez sneaks in there. Or Justin Morneau. Right now it's impossible to call.

Baseball Fan (Detroit): Rob, ever hear of Carlos Quentin?

Rob Neyer: Heard of him, momentarily forgot him. Yes, if the White Sox win the Central he's probably the No. 1 candidate.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)

Jon Danks! Jon Lester! Joe Saunders! #4, 5, and 7 in AL VORP!

Um, Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay, Justin Duscherer! #1, 2, and 3!

NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 14 August 2008 08:25 (seventeen years ago)

Away with your "statistics"!

David R., Thursday, 14 August 2008 13:12 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.