― Casuistry, Wednesday, 21 March 2007 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― Sara R-C, Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― wmlynch, Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― franny glass, Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― franny glass, Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Thursday, 22 March 2007 01:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Thursday, 22 March 2007 01:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― Casuistry, Thursday, 22 March 2007 01:52 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eoghan, Thursday, 22 March 2007 13:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― nathalie, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link
― Casuistry, Thursday, 22 March 2007 16:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― askance johnson, Thursday, 22 March 2007 16:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― Virginia Plain, Thursday, 22 March 2007 18:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Friday, 23 March 2007 02:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Friday, 23 March 2007 02:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 23 March 2007 03:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― nathalie, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― reecie, Sunday, 25 March 2007 03:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Sunday, 25 March 2007 11:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― impudent harlot, Sunday, 25 March 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― max, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― Casuistry, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― mj, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 02:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eoghan, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 09:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael White, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael White, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 16:55 (seventeen years ago) link
― o. nate, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 00:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― franny glass, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 15:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael White, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― MsLaura, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 23:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― C0L1N B..., Thursday, 29 March 2007 06:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― badg, Thursday, 29 March 2007 06:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― m coleman, Friday, 30 March 2007 10:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― franny glass, Friday, 30 March 2007 13:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Sunday, 1 April 2007 12:28 (seventeen years ago) link
― Virginia Plain, Sunday, 1 April 2007 18:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― derrrick, Sunday, 1 April 2007 21:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― frankiemachine, Monday, 2 April 2007 09:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― derrrick, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 07:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― Aimless, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― frankiemachine, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 17:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― mj, Thursday, 5 April 2007 04:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― Casuistry, Thursday, 5 April 2007 05:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― James Morrison, Thursday, 5 April 2007 06:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― nathalie, Thursday, 5 April 2007 10:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan, Thursday, 5 April 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link
MsLaura, "The Necropolis Railway" was great, I thought. It seems to have ended up the start of a series, though I haven't read the others.
― James Morrison, Saturday, 2 June 2007 05:06 (seventeen years ago) link
Ken: Ha! Good call. I think the Hindi/Urdu number might be a typo? These numbers don't resemble the ones on, say, Wiki, all that much.
― Casuistry, Saturday, 2 June 2007 06:06 (seventeen years ago) link
I can't talk to you right now, Chris, I got to go pick up another batch of library books on reserve, even though I am not returning any of my backlog yet.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Saturday, 2 June 2007 18:23 (seventeen years ago) link
i just finished omensetter's luck and will probably do tarzan of the apes before i go back to moby-dick. also i found another heinlein juvenile second-hand today which will probably come up another fifty pages into melville. i may start a poll as to what should be my next stupidly long book after that, hah.
― thomp, Sunday, 3 June 2007 02:41 (seventeen years ago) link
halfway into PKD 'a maze of death'
started george melly 'revolt into style'
finished a bunch of essays on Alain Resnais (the old 'cinema one' paperback by John ward) and a maddening collection of articles written by commie composer Hans Eisler. Really interesting picture of a time.
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 3 June 2007 10:19 (seventeen years ago) link
<i>Enduring Love</i> is indeed good. <i>Don Quixote</i>, I could see why it has the reputation it has, but a dull read for me. The Grossman translation doesn't match the hype, but new translations of classics so rarely do. It may improve on re-reading but I'm not particularly minded to try.
I've hardly been reading, going through a patch where music is obsessing me. I skimmed the last 100 pages or so of <i>Carter Beats the Devil</I> after not really giving it a chance, read it in too small chunks over a long period. Now reading Arlington Park, I feel pretty conflicted by Cusk whose massive talent is too much at the mercy of her neurotic gloom.
― frankiemachine, Sunday, 3 June 2007 18:24 (seventeen years ago) link
Anyone else read Roberto Bolaño's The Savage Detectives? I just finished it about 10 minutes, and it's a great read. Good enough to convince me to order By Night in Chile before I was finished reading the first book, just to have it ready to go.
There's a nice article about Bolaño and The Savage Detectives here
― Z S, Sunday, 3 June 2007 22:27 (seventeen years ago) link
Just finished 10 minutes AGO, I meant. 2666 is due to be translated into English and published sometime next year, and is supposedly 1100 pages. I can't wait.
― Z S, Sunday, 3 June 2007 22:29 (seventeen years ago) link
I haven't read Savage Detectives yet, but By Night in Chile is fantastic. It has one of my favorite last lines of all time.
― wmlynch, Sunday, 3 June 2007 23:43 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm picking up the new Miranda July collection today. Just finished the new David Mamet and Christopher Hitchens books (in that order).
― Mordechai Shinefield, Monday, 4 June 2007 12:20 (seventeen years ago) link
I have that Miranda July book on request at the library. I will most likely get it some time in 2010.
― franny glass, Monday, 4 June 2007 12:46 (seventeen years ago) link
I have the Savage Detectives at home but I can't bear to open it up. Over the weekend I read Iggy Pop: Open Up and Bleed--good summer reading. In that vein, I checked out David Bowie: Living on the Brink, but I think I've already read it.
― Virginia Plain, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 04:58 (seventeen years ago) link
Having polished off two more parts of the Russian Revolution, I paused to refresh myself with Glacial Lake Missoula: And Its Humongous Floods by David Alt.
It describes the physical evidence for the existence of a mammoth lake in Montana, half the size of Lake Michigan, that filled behind a series of glacial ice dams, then repeatedly drained itself when the dams broke, releasing all its 500 cubic miles of water in a matter of days. Yes, I said days. That's about as dramatic as geology ever gets, except maybe for supervolcanoes.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 17:06 (seventeen years ago) link
Ooo! I have that book! Dramatic Palouse Falls in eastern Washington is probably the result of it draining.
― Jaq, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 17:35 (seventeen years ago) link
I started reading that Iggy bio this weekend and had trouble putting it down, although I haven't finished it yet, when I went to bed on Sunday night I had just gotten to the part where they bulldozed the Fun House.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 18:59 (seventeen years ago) link
I think I read McPhee talking about that flood. Or something.
I need to decide which books to take on my trip...
― Casuistry, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 19:14 (seventeen years ago) link
For a second I read that as "talking about that blood" referring to Iggy's blood.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 19:16 (seventeen years ago) link
I've been reading Godel, Escher, Bach by Hofstader, and am amazed I put it off for so long.
― stet, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 19:26 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm reading Sanatorium Under The Sign Of The Hourglass by Bruno Schulz, a book I've adored immensely over the past few months (including random recommendations to friends, associates, and well-wishers), despite having not yet read past page 50 - I imagine I've committed some sin there, but I can't be bothered to fully analyze my actions.
ALSO, I'M REREADING: The Gift by Vladimir Nabokov - actually I've been opening this up at random over the past few months and basking in whatever passage I come upon. I'm probably up to my fourth readthrough at the moment.
― R Baez, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 19:55 (seventeen years ago) link
I've been wondering for the last five years or so, why the hell isn't Sanatorium Under The Sign Of The Hourglass in print?
― Jeff LeVine, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 20:17 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm thoroughly addled by that - I had no idea it was out of print (used copy, natch, from the "Writers From The Other Europe" box set released a few decades back).
― R Baez, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 20:29 (seventeen years ago) link
Stephen Crane: "Active Service" - excellent
― James Morrison, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 08:13 (seventeen years ago) link
if you like Bruno Schultz, read the other genius,most original write from poland (who was also bruno's friend, and also was influenced by Kafka and avant-garde) witold gombrowicz:pornograpfia,cosmos,trans-atlantic,ferdydurke, all masterpieces.the sort of books Nabokov and the south american metaphysics writers (sabato,cortazar..) would have liked (and maybe they did,if they managed to read them). he has this upgraded vision of the Faust myth, that is originay it's own, and it's fascinating.
about Bolano, i was kinda dissapointed by "night in chile", not as superb as some people said it would be,but "savage detective" and "2666" suppose to be much much better.
― Zeno, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link
Alice in Sunderland: An Entertainment, a graphic novel by Bryan Talbot just arrived for me. It looks amazing. I love to be the first borrower of a library book, when it is all new and pristine and untouched.
― Virginia Plain, Thursday, 7 June 2007 01:10 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.grahamrawle.com/books_womans/cover.jpg The rather amazing 'Woman's World' by Graham Rawle, which I'd heard about a while ago, but happened upon in a bookshop yesterday. For those who don't know about it, it's a (proper, somewhat Patricia Highsmith-like) novel constructed entirely from words and phrases cut out of 1960s women's magazines.
Like so: http://www.grahamrawle.com/books_womans/spread-large.jpg
― James Morrison, Friday, 8 June 2007 01:21 (seventeen years ago) link
I am all too tempted to say that, when a dog walks on its hind legs, we do not applaud that it does it well, but that it does it at all.
― Aimless, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:43 (seventeen years ago) link
Yes, but have you read it? It's actually a very good book even if you read it without the context, and, though I can't say how without giving the plot away, the manner of its production has a real point.
― James Morrison, Monday, 11 June 2007 07:23 (seventeen years ago) link
Is that what Dr. Melfi was reading on the penultimate episode of the Sopranos?
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Monday, 11 June 2007 15:33 (seventeen years ago) link
the narrator's actually a guy
― thomp, Monday, 11 June 2007 19:28 (seventeen years ago) link
n.b. i haven't read it
is one of the people on this thread julio desouza? does he still come here?
Btw I watched Notes on a Scandal the other night and thought it was Patricia Highsmithy as fuck.
― Jordan, Monday, 11 June 2007 21:35 (seventeen years ago) link
ha i said the same thing after seeing NoaS
― m coleman, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 10:13 (seventeen years ago) link
I also watched NoaS the other night and thought it was poor, though many of the problems are there in the novel.
I just didn't believe that Sheba would have had an affair with Connolly, also true of the book, but made worse by Blanchett's never-out-of-your-face glamour and picking such a young looking actor to play Connolly. I also didn't believe that Sheba would have gone to live with Barbara near the end, either in the book or the film.
Dench's performance was good, but in the book Barbara's character is slowly revealed: it takes a bit of time to realise how unreliable a narrator she is, and to work out that she is a monster. Dench is a monster from the start. I'm not sure how much this is Dench's fault and how much the director's.
The lesbianism is also more in-your-face in the film than in the book --in the book Barbara is motivated by loneliness, social aspiration, lust for power, and dimly recognized sexual infatuation in more or less equal measures. They are all present in the film, but the lesbianism dominates.
― frankiemachine, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 10:45 (seventeen years ago) link
I finished Zadie Smith's White Teeth, which had its moments - but overall I found it a bit overrated. Maybe three stars. The bits of small-scale observational comedy were better than the quasi-allegorical, portentous sociopolitical plotting that tends to take over in the last third, despite her attempts to keep the tone light and knowing by wink-winking the more obvious improbabilities. She seems to share her weakness in this regard with some other trendy young po-mo writers, like David Foster Wallace, who seem to have absorbed a baleful influence from writers like Pynchon.
― o. nate, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 16:08 (seventeen years ago) link
Hello thomp...I come here every now and again, yes.
Just finished this little comp of essays on the politics of music (from the late 80s) that I picked up off the library shelf. A cpl of ok things but the essay on Ligeti ws...I dunno, he didn't even address Ligeti's break from serialism. The essay on minimalism had some of the (usual) unquestioned (not good, that) generalizations of the differences between European and US composition. Couple of ok ones, but I had to give it back so I couldn't re-read.
The 'Art into Pop' by Simon Firth and...somebody else. Nice enough history of the role of the art school in rock and pop, with some discussion of how certain concepts made their way.
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 17:35 (seventeen years ago) link
Agree about Smith. She's a phenomenal talent, but she under-rates what she's good at (creating psychologically plausible, finely nuanced character) and over-rates the whole baggy po-mo nonsense - I think she feels she HAS to do that kind of thing to be taken seriously, and ends up imitating "big boys" like Rushdie who are not remotely as gifted as she is.
― frankiemachine, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 18:25 (seventeen years ago) link
Yes, I agree - it's a strange pass that we've come to in literary history that in order to be taken seriously you have to be strenuously silly, but there we are.
― o. nate, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 18:44 (seventeen years ago) link
julio, could i get your email address? i'm t✧✧.w✧✧✧@gm✧✧✧.✧0m. if it's not an imposition i'd like to pick your brains about something related to the london free improv scene. cheers.
-
i don't seem to have read much lately. i read a louis sachar novel.
― thomp, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 20:19 (seventeen years ago) link
huh. that's obscured my email address a whole bunch more than i was expecting. why'd it do that?
Yeah, I was wondering how anyone was going to decode that.
I've recently read Herman Hesse's 'The Prodigy', which was OK in a sub-Goethe way, and Gertrude Atherton's 'THe Bell in the Fog'. a collection of her Edwardian/Victorian suspense stories. THe title one is interesting - the central character is patently based on Henry James and his writing 'The Turn of the Screw', and the Henry James analogue develops a frankly creepy obsession with a beuatiful 6yo girl. Good, but odd.
― James Morrison, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 01:26 (seventeen years ago) link
i'm reading the second book of the 'prince of nothing' trilogy by r scott bakker. it's very good, but i don't think it looks as good on a book cv as the other reads here. but then i don't read for self improvement.
― darraghmac, Thursday, 14 June 2007 03:04 (seventeen years ago) link
Experiencing pure enjoyment can be very self-improving.
― James Morrison, Thursday, 14 June 2007 06:07 (seventeen years ago) link
Tom just seen it - as I think I know your surname I've emailed you from an account of mine. Let me know if you get it.
Been having probs w/home internet access so will check back/reply to anything on saturday.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 14 June 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link
The library has 2 of the Updike Rabbit books for me! In the week of not having anything from my hold list, I reread Steinbeck's Sweet Thursday.
― Jaq, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:03 (seventeen years ago) link
Soon we shall need a new 'What Are Your Reading' thread for Summer 2007. I am not dissatisfied with this fact.
I plan to the next week camping and hiking, not forgetting to bring many books with me - ratty paperback books that I can read with grubby hands. The Russian Revolution magnum opus I am (still) reading shall not go with me. It is unsuitable for such pastimes, being both nice and pig-enormous. When I return, I shall reveal all.
― Aimless, Friday, 15 June 2007 23:30 (seventeen years ago) link
speaking of the Rabbit books, I finally bought the Everyman's version w/ a gift card from xmas and am now mid-Redux and its been a great read so far...really enjoying, though I knew I would to be fair.
skimming through, someone mentioned Adam Rapp's Year of Endless Sorrows a while back. Read it maybe 3+ months ago, did like it quite a bit, can basically only remember hilarious workplace party scene w/ main character escorting bosses' daughter.
― johnny crunch, Friday, 15 June 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago) link
Just finished The Road this morning. It was my first c. mccarthy and I was somewhat disappointed. It was somewhat enjoyable, and a rather quick read, but it all just seemed rather pointless. And I guess I just didn't take to his prose, it seemed a bit boring to me.
Before that was Black Swan Green, which I enjoyed immensely. I was sad when it was over. Most sympathetic narrator evah.
― askance johnson, Saturday, 16 June 2007 01:15 (seventeen years ago) link
Has anyone here read and enjoyed The Electric Michelangelo? I had to stop after 60 or so pages because it was all melodramatic, stylistically out-of-control pap. Not a moment could Hall let pass by without adding ornaments to make it profound. Why Hall? Why.
― Arethusa, Monday, 18 June 2007 02:14 (seventeen years ago) link