fantasy novels.

i laughed when gwynn's horse started talking to him. but when the woman arrived in the plot it became much more of a chore to read, bcz their dialogue was the WORST, until the last scene together, and bcz long descriptions of art are getting to be something of a personal bugaboo. (tho better than long shots of art in films, generally.)

the stuff with the priest's backstory towards the end was probably the point i was most affected, and it fit interestingly with the otherwise non-supernatural history of the world. (my angle on their continuing debate was along the lines of: well, this would be a rather sophomoric thing to have running in a novel operating in a world bounded by the laws of reality: so there's going to be some kind of payoff, isn't there) (it wasn't just my favorite bit because i was basking in the satisfaction of being proved right, though that helped.)

jordan: the viriconium books are all interesting, in different ways (not to oversell them or anything - ), and available in a convenient omnibus. said convenient omnibus does print everything in a stupid order but you can't have everything. i never got around to reading the centauri device or the non-genre stuff. never even found climbers, in fact.

also here is a notion to play with:

the quest narrative is of course a CLASSIC. and it seems to be a pretty big staple of the elf-trilogy style of fantasy. (or seems to have been when i was 18.) could you somehow try to define this kind of fantasy by what it does or fails to do with the quest narrative? in contrast to other genres? (e.g. in certain kinds of crime fiction or detective fiction where people have read out of the crime reconstruction or motive-questioning or clue-finding all sorts of assumptions about the nature of modern identity, or rational control by society, or whatever.)

So I have this class and I have to pick one fantasy novel to read for the week after next. There are tons of stuff I would love to read, but, as would be expected, most of it is ludicrously long, and usually part of a series too. So any ideas on what's a great, short fantasy novel to read? We're already reading A Wizard of Earthsea, so it can't be that.

David Lindsay's "A Voyage to Arcturus" or James Branch Cabell's "Jurgen", perhaps?

George R Martin's 'Fevre Dream' - 19th-century-set Mississipi steamboat action with vampire on board
James (?) Stephens - The Pot of Gold: Irish leprechaunery, early 20th century
William Hope Hodgson - House on the Borderland: mad stuff, also early 20th century, about a house that's a portal to another dimension/future apocalyptic earth full of monsters
Jurgen is great. Arcturus is bonkers (not that that's a bad thing).

cosign on The Pot of Gold, it's misogynistic Irish genius

you could also read China Mieville's Un Lun Dun, kids novel from 2007 that is fast and fascinating

the appeal of fantasy to the 10-14 age group is that most other writing for the 10-14 age group is piffle

well, that was how i felt at the time.

fantasy novels are a lot of fun, if done right.

you don't really pick that up from reading this thread, kids!

the best fantasy i've read lately is still the prince of nothing trilogy, but i'm trying to get into george r r martin too, when i get the time.

I just read 'Replay' by Ken Grimwood - man dies at age 43, wakes up as himself at age 18, tries to live his life right this time, dies age 43, wakes up at 18, realises he's lost all the good he achieved last time, starts losing it, dies at age 43, wakes up at 18...

So it's fantasy, but not of the dragons/swords/chainmail bikinis type.

Very good stuff.

So I finished the new Patrick Rothfuss –– anyone else?

there was a fair bit of discussion on the ile fantasy thread - I love the fantasy genre, lots, and I want it to stop sucking (OR: recommend me fantasy stuff that does not suck)

is there a good thread in this generation of fantasy, or a poll even? pre erikson/martin hegemony but post seventies american dri-fi, that high fantasy landfill indie era that jordan probably straddles quite neatly

@ned thisll do i reckon seems to be plenty of discussion of the big 80/90's hitters and their forebears upthread

god it all runs together in my head now, there was one bookshop two hours bus ride away so getting a new book in 1995/6 meant planning a saturday around it and just turning up and seeing what was there so theres some real beggars cant be choosers memories of slogging through stuff that i dont think id manage a chapter of today, before jordan swept all before him (for me, anyway)

after eddings and gemmell grabbed my completionist attn i went through a few runs of half finishing feist, shannara, a few l.e. modessitt jrs, terry goodkind, tad williams (memory sorry and thorn not otherland)

after i actually moved into town and joined the library id have to take a punt at the meagre fantasy section there, often this involved starting in book two or having to skip book seven, unideal stuff

library did provide first robin hobb book tbf so not all bad

if the topic is post eddings high fantasy boom, up to Jordan/martin/Erikson superboom, is that well enough understood and defined to pick through what might be worth choosing and attempting as a comfort read exercise?

mickey zucker reichert's renshai books had a killer premise and seemed appealingly less cartoonish than a lot of the rest at the time, i wonder how theyd read now