Taking sides: One book at a time vs. multiple books on the go

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
when you're reading for pleasure not work/ study.

at the moment i have 3 on the go* which is very unusual for me. generally i read one book to the end before starting the new one. i don't think this is because i can't keep track of more than one (honest) it's just the way i've always done things. One is non fiction, one novel and a book of short stories. i can't remember ever reading even two novels simultaneously.

what do you do?


*Nicholas Shakespeare's "Bruce Chatwin", Joyce Carol Oates' "Rape: A Love Sory", D F Wallace's "Brief Interviews With Hideous Men"

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 23:00 (seventeen years ago) link

I generally have one main fiction selection going at home, a book I'm enjoying and plan on finishing in good order. Currently Hard Boiled Wonderland and the end of the world by Murakami.
I almost always have a nonfiction or two going. Freakonomics, and Assasination Vacation right now. Collections of essays are easy to carry on for weeks or months, good reading in waiting rooms, on public transport, waiting for the kids to get done with music lessons.
I've had some books in my current pile for years: The Western Canon by Bloom I read when I'm reading something from the Canon (Ulysses most recently). Wittgenstein has been a staple next to my toilet for a couple years, preceded by William James (they keep me regular somehow).
I have several friends whom I visit a couple times a year, and inevitably I've found a book to crack open, and rather than buy it myself (unless it's exceptional) i'll simply finish it as I can when i'm visiting.
so there.

Docpacey (docpacey), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 23:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Sometimes I have about ten books going at a time.

But usually it's between 3-5.

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 01:31 (seventeen years ago) link

One book at a time. It's the most enjoyable way

Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 01:56 (seventeen years ago) link

I am always in the process of reading every book ever written. It's just that some of them I haven't picked up in a long long time, or ever.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 02:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I wish I could keep it to one book at a time, but it is usually about 5. I used to have a system where I'd read a chapter of each of 5 or 6 books and sort of rotate them, but now that I have kids it is easier to just randomly pick up books and read what is close to me. (I have books stashed in the car, in my bag, and in the bathroom, as well as on my nightstand and on the couch).

I, too, basically want to read everything ever written, but I'm afraid that I already have enough books at my house alone to last me past my natural life span. I keep hoping there is an afterlife with a fantastic library system.

Sara Robinson-Coolidge (Sara R-C), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 03:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm more of the serial monogamist type.

Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 04:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I am always in the process of reading every book ever written. It's just that some of them I haven't picked up in a long long time, or ever.

Trying to work up some Borges universal library crack, but failing.

Redd Temple Player (TowHeaded O.G.) (Ken L), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 04:49 (seventeen years ago) link

Please explain me the plot of Pierre Menard's Don Quixote.

Redd Temple Player (TowHeaded O.G.) (Ken L), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 04:50 (seventeen years ago) link

What is nature of protagonist?

Redd Temple Player (TowHeaded O.G.) (Ken L), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 04:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm a one at a time fella.

Navek Rednam (Navek Rednam), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 04:52 (seventeen years ago) link

3 or 4 books at a time. I think this question has been discussed before.

Fred (Fred), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 05:36 (seventeen years ago) link

One at a time, usually. If it's something demanding/ something that should really be read in decent-sized chunks, I might also have a book of short stories/essays to fill smaller gaps of time. Or I might take an evening off and read a comics collection.

Ray (Ray), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 06:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Multiple for me. I carry a couple of different books around with me and also have a couple of big hardbacks on the go at home which aren't so easily transportable. I try to mix styles and fiction / non-fiction, otherwise I get confused.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 07:23 (seventeen years ago) link

It depends on my mood, but I often read several books at a time, switching between them based on how I feel on a certain day.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 16:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm with Mikey, I quite often have a small paperback that will fit in my bag (De Botton at the moment sorry) and another one at home; maybe even one I've bought for someone else and am reading in an impossible to spot manner before giving it to them.

sandy mc (sandy mc), Thursday, 11 May 2006 08:31 (seventeen years ago) link

I have several on the go at any one time, but only because I can never be arsed to finish them.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:31 (seventeen years ago) link

books just ain't the ideal size to cart around any more.


i'm not sure i count as having the vast majority of the books i read as 'going'.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 11 May 2006 20:48 (seventeen years ago) link

PJ Miller OTM.

Sons Of The Redd Desert (Ken L), Thursday, 11 May 2006 21:16 (seventeen years ago) link

I have to read whatever's closest to me. Sometimes that's the back of the toothpaste tube. I try not to get too close to more than three or four books at a time at most. It makes me feel dirty.

Hemoglobin Hummingbird (HemoHum), Friday, 19 May 2006 22:52 (seventeen years ago) link

ten years pass...

Have been a dedicated one-book-at-a-time guy for many years -- attempts to make it "two at a time, one fiction and one non-fiction" have always proven unsatisfying -- but has anybody made the transition from one-up to several-going? I'm debating giving it a try in the New Year.

though she denies it to the press, (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Sunday, 1 January 2017 13:59 (seven years ago) link

For me at least, there's an advantage to one-book-at-a-time which is that books have a certain momentum curve. However much I like a book, there always comes a point where I'm looking beyond it to something else, and it's better if I can finish it while I'm still excited about it. If I pick up a second book, chances are higher that the first one won't get finished.

jmm, Sunday, 1 January 2017 14:32 (seven years ago) link

One for the bus, one for the couch/breakfast table, one for the nightstand

Οὖτις, Sunday, 1 January 2017 15:44 (seven years ago) link

There is a discussion of this in an Eric Rohmer film, L'amour, l'après-midi, iirc.

The Magnificent Galileo Seven (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 1 January 2017 15:53 (seven years ago) link

He reads many books, but can only take one on the train.

The Magnificent Galileo Seven (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 1 January 2017 17:05 (seven years ago) link

What would he have done with an ebook reader?

The Magnificent Galileo Seven (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 1 January 2017 17:06 (seven years ago) link

I suffer from the same problem as Joan and jmm. lately I've been able to pull it off with one book + one ebook. shouldn't work but somehow it does.

flopson, Sunday, 1 January 2017 17:49 (seven years ago) link

i need to have fallback books because i have a tendency to go for stuff that is, for me, pretty heavy reading. like i was reading caro's lbj bio for probably years, and i just couldn't make that the only book i read during that period. if i'm not up for reading something like that, what am i going to do, not read?

but i'm ok with not finishing books. one day i'll finish "the master and margarita".

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Sunday, 1 January 2017 18:05 (seven years ago) link

I will usually read one book of poetry alongside one book of prose and then non-fiction articles..

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 1 January 2017 22:38 (seven years ago) link

always 2-3 at a time

a but (brimstead), Sunday, 1 January 2017 22:52 (seven years ago) link

i am reading all of the books, rn

j., Monday, 2 January 2017 00:08 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKlJVB5rhUA

What are you reading now?
What've you got?

The Magnificent Galileo Seven (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 2 January 2017 00:24 (seven years ago) link

Two at once is my preferred method, but only one can be fiction.

Karl Malone, Monday, 2 January 2017 00:39 (seven years ago) link

I can't read two books at once because I always end up having a minor nervous breakdown about how to pack my bag before leaving the house.

If I'm reading something really hard, I used to pack magazines or comics as backup, but now I just read something off my biliously long Instapaper queue instead.

Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 2 January 2017 01:14 (seven years ago) link

Usually one book at a time. When much younger would read multiple books at once, until at one point i was reading a book and its sequel simultaneously, which made me change my ways

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Monday, 2 January 2017 10:41 (seven years ago) link

I am definitely a one fiction book and one non-fiction book (or one graphic novel) at the same time kind of reader. I tend to keep a novel in my bag, and the non-fic for home reading (for some reason I have never been able to read in bed very happily).

Darcy Sarto (Ward Fowler), Monday, 2 January 2017 12:37 (seven years ago) link

Ha, thought I was reading ebook sample of book about Alfred Hitchcock and gradually got an uneasy feeling. "He was born into a world of darkness, obscurity and magic; led a strangely pure and obsessive life, lacking parents, lovers and friends; quarreled bitterly with great men who crossed his path; veered at least once to the brink of madness; cloaked his work in secrecy; and yet discovered more of the essential core of human knowledge than anyone before or since." It turned out I had accidentally clicked on Isaac Newton bio by James Gleick. Took me quite a while to get my balance.

The Magnificent Galileo Seven (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 04:52 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.