― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 20 December 2003 02:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 20 December 2003 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 20 December 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― charltonlido (gareth), Monday, 22 December 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabiscothingy, Sunday, 18 September 2005 21:28 (twenty years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 19 September 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 19 September 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 16:37 (twenty years ago)
― k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)
― k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)
― k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)
― k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 22:27 (twenty years ago)
― k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)
― Laurel, Monday, 26 September 2005 02:16 (twenty years ago)
I know that the above amounts to terrible and useless criticism and I'm sorry. It's not DA, it's me. Gareth says I might like "The Verificationist" more, and two-word-title-October is fast approaching, but I'm not sure I can face it.
― Tim (Tim), Monday, 26 September 2005 08:18 (twenty years ago)
I remember now that the same issue that nagged me about White Noise although a) it was warmer and less, erm, self-consumed? and b) Ben assures me that it was ground-breaking, basically the first of its kind and should get a bye for originality plus the writing is genius. He may be right but I think I'll pass on anything further in this vein.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 22:27 (twenty years ago)
― mary clark, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Friday, 7 October 2005 01:28 (twenty years ago)
no shit.
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 7 October 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 7 October 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:01 (twenty years ago)
I am absolutely loving 'The Afterlife'.
― baaderonixx, Monday, 21 January 2008 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
Ok, just finished it. Shattering. The topic hits very close to home, so might be a bit bias, but Antrim really managed to put across all the nuanced ambivalence of his situation and avoided all the pitfalls of the contemporary 1st person "post-modern" rambling.
― baaderonixx, Friday, 1 February 2008 09:46 (eighteen years ago)
No discussion on the last one? I picked up the Verificationist but had to give up 2/3rds of the way. Laurel pretty much OTM 3 years ago.
― baaderonixx, Monday, 6 July 2009 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
Ha! The Verificationist finally put my finger on why I'd been avoiding a whole category of lit-crit-beloved writers and books for years and years.
― But not someone who should be dead anyway (Laurel), Monday, 6 July 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
What was weird to me about re-reading that, though, is that I'd never thought of The Verificationist as belonging to that category, even though I suppose the check-boxes are all ticked.
― nabisco, Monday, 6 July 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)
Nobody commented on this:
I fucked him many times. The man knows what he is doing.― mary clark, Wednesday, October 5, 2005 11:31 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark
― Jung Danjah (admrl), Friday, 19 August 2011 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
i came here to post about the emerald light in the air, and how good it is - but the most recent post seems more important.
― doing my Objectives, handling some intense stuff (LocalGarda), Sunday, 23 August 2015 11:00 (ten years ago)