Is this, strictly speaking, necessary?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Can someone either delete or severely cut the title of this thread? The board already takes a freaking hour to load these days, I don't think it's cool to be greeted with three pages of exclamation points after battling the poxy fule and whatnot.

Allyzay will never stop making pancakes (allyzay), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:53 (nineteen years ago)

plz for mod to move thread to ilm: two birds, one stone

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

Isn't there some way to limit the number of characters in a thread title to prevent bullshit like that happening again?

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

the length of the thread title actually seemed to cause a problem when trying to delete it so i had to edit the title first then delete.

character limit or truncation on thread titles is ESSENTIAL.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Thursday, 20 July 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

But wait!

There have been some classic threads of quite long titles.

So, make the number a fairly large one...

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 20 July 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)

See, the shamalangadingdong one on ILE now. Wouldn;t be right truncated too harshly.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 20 July 2006 12:37 (nineteen years ago)

Indeed, I was thinking of a reasonably generous 200 characters or so.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 20 July 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)

That shayalamana one is 250 chars.

Maybe a limit on number of chars in a word?

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)

That doesn't do a bloody thing to address the problem, because you just put spaces in between your exclamation points and now it's 2x as long as before and ok. I'm pretty sure people can get their point across within 200-300 characters. I mean, that is what the actual content of the post itself is for, to go into depth as to what you mean.

Allyzay will never stop making pancakes (allyzay), Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

it's only a title Mark, the proof is in the pudding (thread content). this is why it's good to revive older threads on a subject rather than just start new ones all the time!

Konal Doddz (blueski), Thursday, 20 July 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't opened that M. Night thread because I don't really want to know which ILEer (who I probably like) I have been vaguely wishing death upon all day.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 July 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)

i didn't open it because m. night sucks

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Sunday, 23 July 2006 04:20 (nineteen years ago)

Damn straight.

Annie Get Your Gin (noodle vague), Sunday, 23 July 2006 06:42 (nineteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.