really?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

You know what? You're just biologically wrong. And that's it. End of thread.

― Delia & Daphne & Celeste (Masonic Boom), Sunday, April 4, 2010 8:14 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

This thread has been locked by an administrator

I don't want to seem whiny, but that's just... Kate is an administrator? Really?

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

iirc kate's board was turned into iltmi & as such she retained modship

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

pretty much no tmi thread should be locked tho imo

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Seems wrong.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Seems almost like...well... maybe, possibly what happened is that she threw a little shit fit.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

the only mods for ILTMI should be the sitewide mods iirc

ksh, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link

ydnrc imo

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:10 (fourteen years ago) link

^

i mean

plax (ico), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:11 (fourteen years ago) link

In_And_Out thread on TMI board

stand by my post there

acoleuthic, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:12 (fourteen years ago) link

idnrc

ksh, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:12 (fourteen years ago) link

i agree- i think that every mod should lock every thread any time they disagree with any post that's in it. if it's the mod's board, then it's their call, and if it's a sitewide mod, then they can lock any thread they want, and no one can complain about it. right? i'm pretty sure that's how it works on ilx.

― a bold plan drawn up by assholes to screw morons (ytth), Sunday, April 4, 2010 5:37 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Mr. Que, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:13 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah that was kinda ice cold but lol iltmi cmon

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link

missed that thread, thanks.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link

And yeah, it's ILTMI, so who really cares. My butt hurts a lot more from my bicycle seat, tbh. But still. Really?

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:17 (fourteen years ago) link

I have a feeling the answer is, "Really."

still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, me too.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

You know what? Your butt is just biologically wrong.

velko, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:26 (fourteen years ago) link

If butt hurting is wrong, I don't want to be right.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:33 (fourteen years ago) link

If Kate wants a thread about fucking not to be derailed into a thread about sex-determination, that's cool. BTW, I've started a thread about sex-determination.

my full government name (WmC), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, but who wants to read a Kate thread about fucking? Mine was pretty interesting.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Sorry, that was petty. See, now I'm just kind of pissed.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

really?

tehresa, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:43 (fourteen years ago) link

:)

not REALLY, but really.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:44 (fourteen years ago) link

If Kate wants a thread about fucking not to be derailed into a thread about sex-determination, that's cool.

maybe she shouldn't have dropped this bomb on the thread then:

"Remember that Freud had it the wrong way around. The default gender, biologically, is actually female. Males are the weird mutant freaks, chromosomally speaking, with their broken Y chromosome. Foetuses are female until hormones trigger them to mutate and become male. (This also explains why men have nipples.) If anything, a penis is an overgrown malformed clitoris."

still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so. Retaining the mail has not even the dubious purpose of reproduction. The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, it has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.

harbl, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:46 (fourteen years ago) link

haha "retaining the mail"

harbl, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:47 (fourteen years ago) link

males are emotional nipples

velko, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:47 (fourteen years ago) link

TS: the idea that one sex in a sexually reproductive biological system is an "accident" vs. the idea that a chromosome with a greater number of genomes is intrinsically superior to a chromosome with fewer genomes

still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:48 (fourteen years ago) link

scum was the first thing i thought of after reading kate's post

plax (ico), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

walking abortions classic or dud

harbl, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

me too xpost

still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost yeah i knew that's where it came from

harbl, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

really?

Mr. Que, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

See, this is the kind of poo that should be being flung on the thread itself.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Even thought it was supposed to be a thread specifically not about poo. There's no winning.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

walking abortions classic or dud

lol harbl, too close to home

still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so.

really?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link

it seems so wrong.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link

who would open jars?

404s & Heartbreak (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link

actual lol. was about to post that very question.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females.

But then we'll be like apple trees. This won't end well.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link

See, this is the kind of poo that should be being flung on the thread itself.

― kenan, Sunday, April 4, 2010 4:49 PM (5 minutes ago)

Will lock now, if the venting has given way to actual discussion of sex determination.

my full government name (WmC), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Carry on.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:57 (fourteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.