we should go to that thing in stoke newington
i might go to rusholme again soon, not to eat curry though
i still cant think what this track actually is
-- charltonlido (...) (webmail), March 11th, 2005 1:42 AM. (gareth) (link) (admin) (83.67.46.59)
― green uno skip card (ex machina), Friday, 11 March 2005 07:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― charltonlido (gareth), Friday, 11 March 2005 07:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― charltonlido (gareth), Friday, 11 March 2005 07:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 11 March 2005 07:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 11 March 2005 07:21 (nineteen years ago) link
-- Tim Ellison (timelliso...) (webmail), March 13th, 2005 1:00 AM. (Tim Ellison) (link)
― green uno skip card (ex machina), Sunday, 13 March 2005 06:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 13 March 2005 08:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 13 March 2005 08:15 (nineteen years ago) link
-- Al (hoteloper...), May 19th, 2005 9:31 PM. (sitcom) (later)
Oh well, I guess I never noticed (like I said!) Who has time to search all this stuff?? But who cares, I want to know what people think of them anyway!
-- xhuxk (xedd...), May 19th, 2005 9:40 PM. (later)
― Ian John50n (orion), Thursday, 19 May 2005 15:56 (nineteen years ago) link
last killing joke i ever liked much was i think *revelations* (or that *ha!* live 10-inch thing, if that counts - i forget which came first). but i know some people have other opinions about the matter!
-- xhuxk (xedd...), June 5th, 2005 10:36 AM.
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Sunday, 5 June 2005 16:57 (nineteen years ago) link
and they are all shit
― charltonlido (gareth), Sunday, 5 June 2005 17:02 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Sunday, 5 June 2005 17:30 (nineteen years ago) link
-- fact checking cuz (factcheckingcu...), June 6th, 2005 10:13 PM.
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 6 June 2005 04:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:27 (nineteen years ago) link
itz not weird too me. yoo hate chuck for some reason.
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― k/l (Ken L), Monday, 6 June 2005 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― Cool Hand Luuke (ex machina), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:17 (nineteen years ago) link
http://w1.1361.telia.com/~u136100018/mr.cool.jpg
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:26 (nineteen years ago) link
but i was surprised at how definitive was my reaction.
"psuedo-respected" is a cryptic way of saying that a few people on ilm come rattling to his defense when he's in an argument, in a vitriolic way that strikes me as strange... but i don't get the sense that he's known or respected very far outside of rock-crit circles. i guess that means "somewhat respected" rather than the vague and condescending "psuedo-respected."
whatever.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:35 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:36 (nineteen years ago) link
sorry for the flurry of posts. i feel bad about the obnoxiousness of my first two posts so i guess i felt i owed some explanation, even if i just dig a deeper hole for myself in some eyes.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link
ask him sometime what he thinks of his "stature". i swear to god you think about it more then he does. and you bring that attitude into arguments with him instead of just arguing.
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 6 June 2005 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link
i'm not saying chuck goes on about his stature, indeed he seems deliberately to seek to deflate that sort of thing. it's just that i think there a lot of people (a LOT of critics, including some i don't even like much as writers) who could do a lot more with the village voice music pages.... it seems like a missed opportunity to me.
i probably should exit this argument now because i'm feeling sort of bad about it.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― Cool Hand Luuke (ex machina), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:30 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amon (eman), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:52 (nineteen years ago) link
He did it all for the nookie.
― Cool Hand Luuke (ex machina), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 6 June 2005 22:58 (nineteen years ago) link
http://sandbox.pair.com/images/ohsnap.gif
― i don't know anymore (deangulberry), Monday, 6 June 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― charltonlido (gareth), Monday, 6 June 2005 23:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Monday, 6 June 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago) link
http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~stephenbalchin/dastpic.gif
― Cool Hand Luuke (ex machina), Monday, 6 June 2005 23:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 6 June 2005 23:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 00:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 00:30 (nineteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 19:26 (nineteen years ago) link
i really really enjoyed this one. turns out this chuck is a novelist. who knew?
-- fact checking cuz (factcheckingcu...) (webmail), June 7th, 2005 3:01 PM. (fcc) (link)
it's not a novel, though. more like an extended remix of the SPIN piece on rock death sites.-- Matos-Webster Dictionary (michaelangelomato...) (webmail), June 8th, 2005 5:08 PM. (M Matos) (link)
IF YOOOOOOOOOOU DON'T LIKE ITHIT THA' ROAD 'CUZ I JUS-JUS-JUS DON'T CAAAAAAAAARE!-- donut debonair (do...) (webmail), June 8th, 2005 5:16 PM. (donut) (link)
(x-post)it's totally a novel. it's a fictionalized memoir of the road trip he undertook for that spin piece, and if it's "about" anything, it's about himself and a trio of girlfriends. it's not, and it's not trying to be, a piece of journalism. it's not, and it's not trying to be, a work of non-fiction. it's a novel starring a guy named chuck who has shared a lot of experiences with the guy who wrote the book.-- fact checking cuz (factcheckingcu...) (webmail), June 8th, 2005 5:32 PM. (fcc) (link)
OK, I'd been told otherwise.-- Matos-Webster Dictionary (michaelangelomato...) (webmail), June 8th, 2005 6:06 PM. (M Matos) (link)
or at least remember being told otherwise, so it's down to faulty memory-- Matos-Webster Dictionary (michaelangelomato...) (webmail), June 8th, 2005 6:07 PM. (M Matos) (link)
― rett bratner (deangulberry), Wednesday, 8 June 2005 00:15 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 8 June 2005 00:16 (nineteen years ago) link