dakota fanning department

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5223520.stm

― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:34 (nineteen years ago)

Since when was Harry Potter played by Liza Minelli?

― the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:37 (nineteen years ago)

pwnd by bbc

― the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:37 (nineteen years ago)

― david allen grier (dubplatestyle), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:41 (nineteen years ago)

waht

― david allen grier (dubplatestyle), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:42 (nineteen years ago)

The role will require Radcliffe, 17, to appear naked and symbolically blind six horses.

― HPSTRKRFT (haitch), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)

euphemism?

― HPSTRKRFT (haitch), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:47 (nineteen years ago)

lol equus!!!

― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 28 July 2006 12:48 (nineteen years ago)

I understand nothing anymore

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 13:07 (nineteen years ago)

http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/6995/dakota4kh.jpg

― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 28 July 2006 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/rapey.jpg

― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 28 July 2006 15:04 (nineteen years ago)

http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/9582/dakotaly0.jpg

― #1 Sean Connery Fan (#1 Palpatine Fan), Friday, 28 July 2006 15:14 (nineteen years ago)

man her chompers are something else

― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 28 July 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)

i know about dakota fanning raepvision but not this harry potter mutilating horses with his wee-wee thing. i mean now i know about both of them...but before i didn't. and i was happier then

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)

http://website-archive2.nt-online.org/thumbnail.php?id=8543&max=1000
http://www.nypl.org/permissions/images/full/ps_the_cd88_1335.jpg
http://www.filmposters.com/images/posters/5471.jpg

― milton parker (Jon L), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

with Joan Plowright as 'The Horse'

― gear (gear), Friday, 28 July 2006 17:18 (nineteen years ago)

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41939000/jpg/_41939536_radcliffe2_bodygetty.jpg

Radcliffe Joker-casting rumors for Batman Begins 2 start NOW

― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 28 July 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

He is a diligent monobrow waxer. Look at that void where monobrow should be.

― the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Friday, 28 July 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/2996/picture2nz9.png

― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 28 July 2006 18:20 (nineteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6f/Esp3.jpg

― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 28 July 2006 18:23 (nineteen years ago)

I AM YOURS AND YOU ARE MINE

― rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Friday, 28 July 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)

i didn't even know that movie existed!

― rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Friday, 28 July 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)

and i totally can't deal with dakota's teeth!

― rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Friday, 28 July 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)

So is that shirt NOT photoshopped? WTF.

― the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)

she knows which side her bread is buttered on

― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:04 (nineteen years ago)

that shirt looks photoshopped to me.

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

REALLY?!?!?!?1?

― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

yeah i didn't think it was photoshopped, either. because if it was photoshopped, you could make it say something more scandalous. but this just looks like an actual t-shirt from juicy couture that dakota bought because it's a hip designer.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)

although come to think of it, the "b" in the word "be" looks suspicious.

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:20 (nineteen years ago)

jon I think your sarcastic response to my announcement is unwarranted what with two posters on this thread deciding the photo ISN'T photoshopped--wtf dudes? the perspective is completely off on the letters.

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

I think the shirt originally read "You Oughta Be In Juicy" -- note the 'M' in 'My' was obviously done freehand. So yeah, it looks photoshopped, but most of the manipulation was just moving words around.

― elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

the shirt originally said "you oughta pee on me, juicy"

― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:23 (nineteen years ago)

THE SHIRT ORIGINALLY SAID "HI PEDOPHILES AND INTERNETS THAT LIKE TO MAKE FUN OF ME, I AM DAKOTA FANNING"

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

wait, no, that's the shirt I'm wearing

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

http://images2.nordstrom.com/images/store/product/thumbs/144272.jpg

no my in the real shirt

― Supercalifragilisticexpiala Brosius (chaki), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:25 (nineteen years ago)

that 'be' definitely used to be somewhere lighter. but who cares?

― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

1) nickalicious
2) jaymc

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

dudes i'm sure if you look at the color levels in different regions or some shit you'll be able 2 tell

― Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

1+2=0

― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

DID YOU GUYS KNOW THAT THAT FACE UP THERE IN THE PHOTO ISN'T DAKOTA FANNING'S FACE? TOTAL PHOTOSHOP!!!!

― Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Friday, 28 July 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

why didn't they photoshop the teeth. ugh.

― elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Friday, 28 July 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

#1 Palpatine Fan posted here haaaaa

― Lmaoborghini (eman), Sunday, 30 July 2006 02:12 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wwXYU4aE1Q

― sleep (sleep), Thursday, 3 August 2006 07:13 (nineteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.