an open letter to the mods from Whiney G. Weingarten

That makes zero sense to me.

― lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:44 PM (27 seconds ago) Bookmark

which part?

whiney wanted to serve concurrent sentences

nah, it was to prevent him from possibly serving concurrent sentences

from whiney:

I 100% feel like I was temp-banned for annoying Dan Perry and nothing else. I have learned absolutely nothing from this experience and when I return in 27 days, I will continue to post as I always have, even--and especially--if that includes lightly poking fun of the terrible mod decisions of Dan and jjjusten. If they're too thin-skinned to handle that, they can continue temp-banning me and everyone until ILX is the boring cuddle party they so clearly desire.

plz point out where i was wrongly characterizing whiney in this quote

I'd like to point out, just for the point of talking you understand, that as far as I can tell Whiney made like 3 posts about mods/rape/unperson's screen-name. Calling it "going on for the last week" isn't exactly accurate, I don't think.

j0rdan that might have been a bad system game tho because this is whineys 2nd sb which is supposed to be a 60 day ban.

you will rue the terrible day whiney returns to speak the truth before the ppl

nah, it was to prevent him from possibly serving concurrent sentences

...

Did you mean "consecutive"? Because otherwise you are still not making any sense.

yeah, consecutive

only whiney could parlay a 3 day ban into a 63 day ban, I gotta admit the guy goes big

j0rdan that might have been a bad system game tho because this is whineys 2nd sb which is supposed to be a 60 day ban.

― O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:49 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

well at that point it had been established that neither l0u1s jagg3r nor kate served 60 days

plz point out where i was wrongly characterizing whiney in this quote

― O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:47 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

i didn't realize that whiney had made a specific note about you guys in his letter

This is only Whiney's 2nd sb? for real?

:3

Well actually what Sarahel did was revive this thread to say the temp ban was harsh and THEN go and read the Rollins thread to find out why he was tempbanned. Disingenuous as hell.

― Matt DC, Thursday, November 4, 2010 3:15 AM (8 hours ago)

I beg your pardon, what? This came up on a different thread, and Dan had said that basically Whiney got banned for pissing him off. I understand the increasing length of temp ban thing that's built into the system, and that that's why it was 27 days, but not overriding the system, which Dan has done in the past, seemed harsh.

When did omar little become such a policy lovin pussy? shameful, bro.

we're all rollins imo

Wait who cares if I registered today and asked for an invite? What exactly are you guys protecting? So I have to like know some of you guys personally if I want to read the super secret elite board everyone talks about?

― the questeon, Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:55 PM

it's just kinda hard to have a rational discussion with mods about this kinda thing, when it feels like, as a poster, when you do bring stuff up, you get accused of "meta snark" or "concern trolling" or have your motives questioned. It's kinda the equivalent of when posters accuse mods of conspiring or all posting from the same slumber party.

oh shit i misread the questeon as "the question"!

i <3 the questeon

where was all this mods rapey stuff going on, obviously thats uncool but i didnt see it at all which is why i was all why did whiney get banned

When did omar little become such a policy lovin pussy? shameful, bro.

― the questeon, Thursday, November 4, 2010 3:07 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

xp the instances i found were in the rollins thread and the k. wiig thread

omar gone soft, better watch his back in corner delis.

o i didnt read the kristen wiig thread

also in the 77 beatles thread

whiney got banned for the exchange in the rollins thread

When did omar little become such a policy lovin pussy? shameful, bro.

― the questeon, Thursday, November 4, 2010 3:07 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

― max

¯\(°_o)/¯

it is a message board on the internet, i think it's all lol

some of you people seem to think this is actually important, which is more lol

whiney will be back soon, ready to roll. he's probably out there enjoying the lovely nyc weather, having a break from the ilx lyfe.

it is important enough to discuss on a message board on the internet

it's good times

so, will Whiney get unbanned after his 30 days for being sb-ed are over, or what?

http://i56.tinypic.com/ao5g21.gif

frankly most of the mods have been on this thread so we havent really discussed it yet

this is whineys 2nd sb which is supposed to be a 60 day ban.

he can make a plea for leniency but his cotton mather act might put a kink in those plans

thanks, jjj - i know i've trolled you in the past, but i appreciate your transparency and candor in mod-related issues.

whiney is always a hard case to defend in board lawyering

compared to cankles?

madoff vs manson

mods should have a pre-determined annual bank of ban days for whiney and just use a few up whenever he is overheating.

maybe we should put these bans in some kind of lockbox

whiney is the bob probert of ilx, his job simply involves spending a decent amount of time in the penalty box.

That is such blasphemy.

Ty Domi, maybe.

an open letter to the mods from Whiney G. Weingarten

my "i'm only gonna come back stronger" post was made when I was under the assumption that I was banned for 27 days over pointless, arbitrary dan perry beef. If it was a three-day comedy ban, I would have honestly laughed along with Dan about the whole thing. However I will gladly take my democratically decided 30-day 51-suggban sentence like a man, as it is clearly what the people want.

Also, sincere, non-snarky apology to Abbbott or if anyone who got legitimately offended by my 2 or 3 posts re mod/rape/phil. It was an admittedly dickish way to point out what I felt was a hypocrisy of mod action being "ruin the best thread on 77" instead of "confront a dude about his rapey display name."

That is all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7gkD5uyl-U

had subway for lunch in his memory

drowned a doe eyed girl while sobbing uncontrollably

pulled out the tablecloth and upset the pussy buffet