let's make a thread about that
― Angus Young (roxymuzak), Sunday, 30 August 2009 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link
1p3 admin log
― stfuhut (k3vin k.), Sunday, 30 August 2009 21:15 (fourteen years ago) link
kevin keller, me deleting a boring post you made is not a scandal!!
― Angus Young (roxymuzak), Sunday, 30 August 2009 21:35 (fourteen years ago) link
i dunno this seems to be a pattern maybe u should consider stepping aside as 1p3 mod
― permanent response lopp (harbl), Sunday, 30 August 2009 22:28 (fourteen years ago) link
^
― Angus Young (roxymuzak), Sunday, 30 August 2009 22:34 (fourteen years ago) link
what in the name of piglets with wings
― do HOOS ever just steen into space and weep (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 30 August 2009 22:35 (fourteen years ago) link
rox will step aside as an 1p3 mod on the day that grady (may he RIP) ceases to be dope i.e. NEVER
― do HOOS ever just steen into space and weep (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 30 August 2009 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link
ty hoos
― Angus Young (roxymuzak), Sunday, 30 August 2009 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link
i think harbl meant to post that on
Suicide by cop
― velko, Sunday, 30 August 2009 22:40 (fourteen years ago) link
; )
― permanent response lopp (harbl), Sunday, 30 August 2009 22:41 (fourteen years ago) link
― Angus Young (roxymuzak), Sunday, August 30, 2009 5:35 PM (2 hours ago)
i was reposting a pic you posted captioned "it wasn't me, the dog did it!" in the spirit of this very thread, emily.
― stfuhut (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 August 2009 00:21 (fourteen years ago) link
shit gettin heated
― bnw, Monday, 31 August 2009 00:55 (fourteen years ago) link
great thread
― fo shza my tza (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 31 August 2009 00:59 (fourteen years ago) link
ty ;)
― Angus Young (roxymuzak), Monday, 31 August 2009 03:12 (fourteen years ago) link
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61hBTiG9NTL._SL500_AA240_.jpghttp://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-09-09ur.jpghttp://www.okiesister.com/.a/6a00e55029da2088340105361c5e3c970b-400wi
― king dom, come (k3vin k.), Thursday, 3 September 2009 02:37 (fourteen years ago) link
u turkey
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 3 September 2009 06:46 (fourteen years ago) link
I think Roxy should be re-modded, but I also think mods shouldn't ban other mods unless there's a really, really good reason for it. (Why *did* you ban Kate, Roxy?) Also, if what Jjjusten says is true, and Roxy was de-modded by a sitewide mod as a retaliation for banning Kate (and without giving Roxy any notice of it), I find that kinda baffling. Wouldn't it have been more sensible to email Roxy and Kate and see if they can settle this thing between themselves (which I'm sure they can) before reverting to these sort of playground tactics?
― Tuomas, Thursday, 3 September 2009 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link
truothbuomb
― velko, Thursday, 3 September 2009 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link
http://media.redding.com/media/img/photos/2008/01/28/PLAYGROUND28C-01_t607.jpg
― carne asada, Thursday, 3 September 2009 20:29 (fourteen years ago) link
BoyGilr
― velko, Thursday, 3 September 2009 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link
I wasn't even aware there was a "thing" between any of us, so your suppositions are a bit off base, Tuomas. This thread was the first I heard of it - I assumed it was some drunken joke on Roxy's part rather than evidence of anything sinister.
― Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 3 September 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link
Yeah, I didn't want to imply there's any "thing" going on, what I meant is that if a mod thought Roxy banning you was a problem, maybe he should've emailed you two first to see if there is any problem, or at least informed Roxy about all this. I don't think mod powers should be abused, but this sort of silent "retaliation" (if that is indeed what happened) instead of talking with the participants seems rather odd to me too.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 3 September 2009 20:55 (fourteen years ago) link
again, i am not the mod who made this decision, but it looks like you are saying that roxy banning her fellow mod w/o notification was acceptable behavior, but the violation (or as you call it "playground tactic") here is a sitewide responding to the situation demodding roxy w/o notification?
― A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link
tempbanning and demodding are on different levels imo
― fo shza my tza (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link
you can't tuomas a tuomas, jj xp
― king dom, come (k3vin k.), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link
It was not "retaliation". Neither was it retaliation.
A board mod abused her powers. Those powers were removed. End of story. It is self-evident that not all of the boards are modded the same way and that behavior that would make sense on IRE or ITR would not be appropriate on ILTMI.
If both of you feel comfortable having roxy as mod of the board and she still wants to be a mod, her powers can be reinstated.
― cherokee flux (HI DERE), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link
uh crut why do you assume that it was a temp ban?
― A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link
xposts never mind this is a conversation that isn't worth really unpacking
No, I'm not saying banning Kate was acceptable behaviour. Like I already said in the previous two posts, I don't think mod powers should ever be abused (even in a joking manner), but I can't see why the response to that needed to be like this. I think it would've been more constructive to first contact Roxy and Kate about the whole thing before making any decision to de-mod anyone.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link
i think that HI DERE answered your question in his last post.
― A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link
this would never happen on I LOVE CRICKET: THE CHINATOWN OF ILX: THE CHINATOWN OF ILX
― fleetwood (max), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:11 (fourteen years ago) link
"et tu, maximus"
― They are known for contracting the ugliest players, like Kuyt (country matters), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:12 (fourteen years ago) link
think that HI DERE answered your question in his last post.
So instead of first talking to Roxy and Kate and me, and after that deciding whether to de-mod Roxy or not, it makes more sense not to notify anyone or explain anything before Roxy starts a thread about it?
― Tuomas, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:13 (fourteen years ago) link
lol this thread
― caek, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:13 (fourteen years ago) link
we're still ban-free over at ILTRMB, btw, all bros all the time
― crabRCISE (gbx), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link
there was one banning
― caek, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link
why do you assume that it was a temp ban?
I called it a temp ban because she was only banned for a short while. I was too lazy to type "possibly a permaban that was reversed shortly thereafter" instead of "temp ban"
― fo shza my tza (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:15 (fourteen years ago) link
LAZY
― caek, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:15 (fourteen years ago) link
oh wait i banned someone, n/m
― crabRCISE (gbx), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:16 (fourteen years ago) link
we can post pictures again now, right?
― king dom, come (k3vin k.), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:17 (fourteen years ago) link
Anyway, I'm all for giving Roxy her mod powers back. If she should abuse her mod powers again in the future, then you can de-mod her permanently, but for now let's give her a second chance.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/d/d2/20080108031452!Yalta_summit_1945_with_Churchill,_Roosevelt,_Stalin.jpg
jj and dan in the background discussing how to fuck w iltmi mods.
― caek, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link
Sunday, August 16, 2009 8:17 PM Site hüzün (Masonic Boom) has been temporarily banned from I Love TMI.
― velko, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:22 (fourteen years ago) link
only because john asked, not saying it should mean anything in this discussion
― velko, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:24 (fourteen years ago) link
log don't lie
― am0n, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:27 (fourteen years ago) link
board lawyering 101
― velko, Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:28 (fourteen years ago) link
It would have been nice had this whole conversation (starting with site mods telling me how I was banned from mine own board) been more transparent to those actually affected at the time, rather than a 105 post clusterfuck, but you know, too late now.
― Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link
At the time, we didn't know how you had been banned.
― cherokee flux (HI DERE), Thursday, 3 September 2009 21:59 (fourteen years ago) link
kate, we can avoid this becoming a further clusterfuck if a) you tell us whether you want roxy reinstated b) roxy says whether she wants to be reinstated
― A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Thursday, 3 September 2009 22:40 (fourteen years ago) link
ban tuomas
― history mayne, Thursday, 3 September 2009 22:43 (fourteen years ago) link