Rolling US Economy Into The Shitbin Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (9719 of them)

Ed, the US hasn't made its pennies out of copper in at least 20 years. I believe they're made of zinc, with a very very thin copper coating.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 November 2007 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Ed - I'm aware of china pegging it's dollar. but as far as I'm aware, largest trading partner = Canada. Followed by China and then Mexico. Am I wrong?

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link


Canada 47.56 367.87
China 34.34 246.29
Mexico 31.55 227.46
Japan 16.96 137.75
Federal Republic of Germany 12.95 94.78
United Kingdom 8.57 70.94
Korea, South 6.78 55.28
Taiwan 5.85 42.44
France 5.49 45.56
Brazil 4.55 32.36

remy bean, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't the US dollar at something like a 20-year low against the Canadian dollar too? What difference are you trying to tease out?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Err. headers should be ||Country|| ||billions of dollars traded in August 07|| ||Billions 2007 to date||

remy bean, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Try 50 year! And a small distance from a historical record.

xpost

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

So it's like, the dollar is low by any measure.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, when your currency reaches parity with your largest trading partner - when it was 1=.65 a matter of years ago - it should really set off a good deal of reevaluation of the overall nature of business between the two. It's sort of causing chaos in Canada - many businesses no longer being able to compete on the merits of a weaker dollar alone, exports way down and all sorts of crazy pricing discrepancies setting off a tidal-wave of cross boarder shopping. it's the largest trade relationship in the world, if I'm not mistaken, and a sudden reversal of currency value I think should merit more evaluation.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Whatever subprime backed securities were on the bank's balance sheets when the shit hit the fan are being moved off the bank's balance sheets (but obviously, they're having to sell at a loss, which is what all these write downs are).

I don't think much has been moved off bank's balance sheets yet. The writedowns are just the banks writing down the market value of things that are still on their balance sheets. These markets have basically stopped trading since the credit crunch hit, so there's been little opportunity for banks to unload this stuff, and if they were forced to unload it, they'd certainly get even less than the marks they're putting on it now. In addition, there is the danger that banks will have to move even more of this stuff onto their balance sheets if some of the SIVs and conduits that they're backing fail to find financing.

This article from the FT says that there are good reasons to fear that worse is still to come for the banks:

Fall in ABX sparks fresh credit fears

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost
well for me it seems that reaction in Canada = OMG OMG OMG
where as in the States = zuh?

another xpost

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

you know what. i don't know what my point was. i'm going back to the pot thread.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

The writedowns are just the banks writing down the market value of things that are still on their balance sheets.

But with subprime, they haven't been able to do that because the market is so illiquid. Goldman explicitly stated in their earnings report that everything they couldn't value from the market, they sold.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Just to add, if some banks are holding them on their books, it's axiomatic to say that they must believe they're worth more than what they can sell them for, and that they've presumably priced in the fact that lots of people are going to start coming teaser rates into that valuation.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^Ach, meant to emphasise some, not banks.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

testing

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

If there isn't a market price, the banks usually use models to come up with a price. That's what they call "Level 3" assets. Goldman may be one of the least exposed to subprime of the major banks, but they still had level 3 assets representing $72B at the end of their third quarter:

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/goldmanaug-level-3-asset-value/story.aspx?guid=%7BA5F0CE1D-4004-448D-967B-895CC8213FD6%7D

xpost- Banks may think they can get a better price if they wait, but that's a dangerous game when prices are falling.

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

(oops, please ignore that "testing" post)

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

you ever read that book about Long Term Capital Management o. nate ("When Genius Failed")?

Dandy Don Weiner, Thursday, 1 November 2007 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Book rules.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Thursday, 1 November 2007 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, I've read it. Good book.

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Too bad more people haven't read it.

Dandy Don Weiner, Thursday, 1 November 2007 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

when you consider the people who were involved with LTCM, it's fucking frightening.

And my point being that illiquidity and exposure are pretty damn complicated issues at banks in a scary house of cards kind of way.

Dandy Don Weiner, Thursday, 1 November 2007 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, they had a quant from GS quoted in the FT a while back saying how crazy the credit squeeze was, and how it shouldn't've happened in three universe lifetimes according to his models, and I thought dude, how can earth can you not've read that book (cause he clearly wouldn't've said that if he had)?

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Thursday, 1 November 2007 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

There was an entertaining polemic by Nassim Nicholas Taleb (author of Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan) in the FT the other day about the models that generate these kinds of (unrealistic) predictions.

The pseudo-science hurting markets

I think he overstates his case a bit, but he does it with wit and is thought-provoking in a good way.

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

The dollar can fall against cents, and has been doing so very nicely in the last couple of weeks, the ECB having failed to take my suggestion that a tenth of a Euro be called a Euroling.

Nubbelverbrennung, Thursday, 1 November 2007 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

do you have a point

El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow! I guess there are a few bright spots (unfortunately not ones in my portfolio).

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

stocks be rocketing like fogdog.com

wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 1 November 2007 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

once did.

wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 1 November 2007 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

A few big tech stocks with compelling growth stories are doing well. I'm a bit pessimistic on where the broader market is heading though.

o. nate, Thursday, 1 November 2007 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

so am I, but I am usually wrong. It is sticking your neck out calling a crash when the DJIA is all of 5% off the alltime high. But it will be fun watching Jim Cramer forcing a smile and making picks on CNBC here in 5 minutes.

wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 1 November 2007 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow- this just keeps getting uglier for Merrill:

Deals With Hedge Funds May Be Helping Merrill Delay Mortgage Losses

o. nate, Friday, 2 November 2007 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I came across an individual lawsuit plaintiff named Meryl Lynch yesterday.

Hurting 2, Friday, 2 November 2007 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i wish i knew more about this stuff and bought gold and google a few years ago

artdamages, Friday, 2 November 2007 15:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I have never had much capital to invest really but when I put $2000 into a international/developing markets mutual fund it was EXACTLY one month before a huge sell-off in that sector. So I do tend to call things a little early. OTOH, for a individual investor, I think calling a bear and hedging early is a lot wiser than believing a bull and buying late. Google, Rim and Apple all have nice narratives to their success and have been making headlines for years now, so it's no surprise amateurs are getting into it. "Hey, I use Google/an iPod/my BlackBerry every day! I should invest in these guys!"

El Tomboto, Friday, 2 November 2007 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

moral for me as an investor (once I cover my recent debt injection) - if you want to invest in any sector, wait it out for a 12 month low. if it doesn't happen, you missed the boat, try again next year.

El Tomboto, Friday, 2 November 2007 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I usually make those decisions during the long holidays I take at my country house in the Algarves.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 2 November 2007 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz. even if i ever have money i doubt i'd ever risk speculating on the market.

artdamages, Friday, 2 November 2007 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes. My advice to clients these days is to invest in property -- it's as safe as houses! I specifically recommend Florida condos. There are some crackerjack deals all over the coast.

Or, if you want something even safer, stash those dollars in a trunk and bury the trunk. And don't tell anyone where it is. Now THAT money won't be going ANYWHERE. Unless the dollar falls further of course.

Hmm.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 2 November 2007 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

It's been a while since I thought about finance with any real depth, but that Taleb column seems like such crap. Academic financial models hardly work better than random chance? Is that not entirely the point? If he and his buddies can predict the market so much more effectively than 150,000 business schools teaching the MPT, why the hell is he making his money writing pop-culture social science books and not trading?

webber, Monday, 5 November 2007 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

haha this buddy of mine was telling me this weekend how his neighbor (whom I know) keeps $20K in cash in his basement in a safe. I'm not sure if I should mention this, but Mr. Sock Drawer is a chiropractor.

Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 5 November 2007 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

dude seriously who tells people that shit? good way to put you and your family in danger.

El Tomboto, Monday, 5 November 2007 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Academic financial models hardly work better than random chance? Is that not entirely the point? If he and his buddies can predict the market so much more effectively than 150,000 business schools teaching the MPT, why the hell is he making his money writing pop-culture social science books and not trading?

I think his point is not that he can predict the market better than the models, but rather that the models give those who use them a false sense of security.

o. nate, Monday, 5 November 2007 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

http://ichart.finance.yahoo.com/3m?cadusd=x

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 6 November 2007 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks to abanana

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 6 November 2007 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

November 9, 2007, 12:34 pm
Midday Tidbits — 99 Problems for the Dollar
Posted by Tim Annett

How much Rocawear could these euros buy?
# First Gisele, then China, now Jay-Z? Earlier this week, reports (later denied) that supermodel Gisele Bundchen was demanding to be paid in euros rather than dollars led to many jokes that surely this must be a sign of a bottom for the little-loved greenback. Nobody was laughing much when a Chinese political official badmouthed the buck later in the week, leading to the latest of many dollar selloffs. Now, either as another sign of the bottom, or just another kick to the dollar’s ribs on the way down, rapper Jay-Z has joined the dollar-bashing party. In the video for his new single, “Blue Magic,” at about 1:20 in, when Jay says, “I don’t spin on my head, I spin work in the pots so I can spend my bread,” the “bread” he is preparing to spend is a big stack of euros, not dollars. Et tu, Jay-Z? — Mark Gongloff (Hat Tip: Jesse Pesta)

Hurting 2, Friday, 9 November 2007 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

http://online.wsj.com/media/jayz_c_20071109113234.jpg

Hurting 2, Friday, 9 November 2007 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.