goodfellas

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1044 of them)
I don't hate the obvious, I hate lazy cultural experiences. My favourite film is probably Jaws.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:09 (nineteen years ago) link

The soundtrack is superb - I defy anyone to do coke-addled paranoia better than the scenes leading up to the arrest of Henry.

This is the key point I think, no-one, other than say Jonathan Demme or Tarantino can use popular music as a plot device as well as Scorsese. Take the music away it's a fine, well acted, above average mob movie. Put the soundtrack in, it's elevated to a work of genius. Whenever I hear the piano coda of 'Layla' I immediately think of the corpse swimming through the trash (and what a duffer the rest of Clapton's catalogue is).

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:12 (nineteen years ago) link

cool.

crosspost

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Point: has anyone changed their opinion of Goodfellas, for better or worse, since the advent of The Sopranos?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think so.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Goodfellas is just such a thoughtless, hollow, unappealing film though. From the way the camera moves and shots are composed to the way the characters interract with each other, everything is about appearance and glamourisation, and glamourisation of really nasty, base, horrible things. And they're neither nasty, base and hollow in a compelling, rubbernecking way, or in a thrilling, exciting way, it's just deadening and unpleasant and empty.

And aside from my dislike of it on an aesthetic and emotional level, there's the whole rhetoric that surrounds it, which works on two levels. The first is the whole "oh but they're gangsters and cool and romantic and italian and just cool and it's such a cool film man I loe it when he shoves that thing in the back of the guy's neck" which is pretty easy to dismiss because it's utterly superficial. And then there's the level above that, which is what Henry's just wandered into, which is the use of film school technical talk to justify liking the film and take the film from being "a film I like" to "a great film", which then engenders a belief in the person delivering the rhetoric that it's absolutely impervious to criticism and that anybody who disagrees is just plain wrong and their opinion not worth considering. That whole "oh but the mis-en-scene is so great, and the lighting on the car outside the house and the way this shot cuts into the next and so on and the way blahblahblah", yes, technically it might be very well put together but that does NOT mean that everyone MUST necessarily like it. And that out-of-hand dismissal of someone else's opinion because you believe yours to be based in fact is total fucking rockism.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:22 (nineteen years ago) link

I like 'GF' and 'The Sopranos' like family. Neither of them are lazy cultual experiences. And not hollow: they both conjure up reallly dense feelings of being-there-ness. They don't glamourize violence, but thye don't moralize either. An obvious gangster meme is how close gangster practice is to 'legit' practice. This is a film that practically got me into film. But I wasn't much aware of all the film school stuff then. It just felt like a film I could immerse myself in. Now unfortunately I know how it's put together. But FFS: 'Jaws' has the *same* film-school stuff: they *both* use the 'Vertigo' zoom in/track back!

ENRG (Enrique), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:27 (nineteen years ago) link

I know it does, but I just find Jaws much more compelling and enjoyable; saying I should like both because they both use the Vertigo zoom is like saying you should like M People and The Small faces cos they both did "Itchycoo Park", or should like The Stone Roses and The Seahorses because Squire played guitar in both and he's technically very good, or that I ought to like both Embrace and Coldplay because bits of their work sound a bit alike. If it was JUST about liking things because of their similarities to other things you like, what would be the point? Cultural existence would be so much more predictable and dull. I don't find GF immersive, I find it oppressive and unpleasant, and not worth the while of the unpleasantness.

And I'm not saying that GF or TD are in themselves "lazy cultural experiences", because I'm not sure anything of itself it, but the way the rhetoric that surrounds these films directs the discourse of them suggests a lazy cultural experience on the part of many people viewing them, because they've already been canonised as 'classic' people simply sit and watch them and accept that classic status and repeat it by rote, instead of trying to actually engage with the film themselves. It's second-hand reactiosn to things, received wisdom masquerading as insight.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:35 (nineteen years ago) link

it's okay, that you don't like it.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I know that - my problem is with people who insist that it's not OK to not like it - I'm not trying to convince anyone else to not like it, just justifying why I don't like it, because so often my opinion of GF and TD etcetera is met with such incredulity that I've had to explain exactly why countless bloomin' times.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:40 (nineteen years ago) link

And, you know, it's always just as valid to not like something as it is to like it, as long as you've made an effort to engage and understand why other people do like it.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think those people really exist, though: I'm sure rockists really *do* like Paul Weller on a gut level, same as I like 'Goodfellas' that way. The problem is when you write off, say 'Jaws' for being popcorn bullshit or whatever: *that* would be rockism. It's okay not to like it, just, you know, totally, irreversibly wrong-headed ( I kid, I kid ).

ENRG (Enrique), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:42 (nineteen years ago) link

that isn't justification; it's dismissal.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:46 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm putting forth reasons for my dismissal, RJG, ergo justification.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, Henry, it's not about liking Weller on a gut level or dismissing Jaws as popcorn bullshit - it's about refusing to accept that some people don't like Weller.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:48 (nineteen years ago) link

that's true. people just get very attached to their favourite things. it's like people who don't like red wine or sex or something, it's like 'wtf?'.

ENRG (Enrique), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:51 (nineteen years ago) link

your "reasons" don't seem to be about the movie.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:53 (nineteen years ago) link

wtf is Goodfellas is just such a thoughtless, hollow, unappealing film though. From the way the camera moves and shots are composed to the way the characters interract with each other, everything is about appearance and glamourisation, and glamourisation of really nasty, base, horrible things. And they're neither nasty, base and hollow in a compelling, rubbernecking way, or in a thrilling, exciting way, it's just deadening and unpleasant and empty then?

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:53 (nineteen years ago) link

thoughtless, hollow, unappealing

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:54 (nineteen years ago) link

So "I don't like the film because of my reaction to the film, which is one of dislike because of X, Y and Z" is not sufficient then?

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:56 (nineteen years ago) link

it's not that you didn't give reasons, but it's like 'how so? it isn't any of those things!' i can't be rational about this, helas. also i am tired and emotional today.

ENRG (Enrique), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:57 (nineteen years ago) link

X, Y and Z?

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 09:58 (nineteen years ago) link

OK. I feel no empathy for any of the characters, I feel like an utterly disenfranchised observer at all times, neither sickened nor wowed by events. This goes for all Scorsese films I have seen - not one character in one of his films has appealed to me as a human. I also find the tone of them too serious and self-important - say TD is about the fall of man in urban environment, well so is Fightclub but FC is funny and has visuals which I find much more appealing, plus a degree of self-reference which I always welcome. I don't find the way Scorsese frames shots or moves a camera striking or dazzling (and I don't mean being literally dazzled by light or speed, I mean in a "wow, that was an amazing shot" way) at all, which seems to be something a lot of other people like about them. Plus impressions of Joe Pesci are always >>>>>> Joe Pesci himself.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Also I came to GF after I'd fallen for The Godfather, which seems to deal with many of the same ideas, but does so on both a bigger and more well observed scale - it's about family, it's not a gangster movie, it's a fucking great big family romance (not in the Freudian sense, obv.).

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:05 (nineteen years ago) link

I do not like Goodfellas, but 80's movies that culminate in basically every other cast member chasing the protagonist throught the streets are the BEST so I think I'm with Alex on this one.

(Goodfellas, come on, it doesn't say "fuck you" to the old guard, it is itself the last of the truly clichéd self-satirizing stupid old mob movies unless you count Casino except Casino is great. Fuck it, I just hate most trad-mob movies I guess).

on review: Nick OTM esp. re: Pesci.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Just the whole first wave of New Hollywood was like ugh.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:09 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked you.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:10 (nineteen years ago) link

wait a minute wtf does that mean it's 1990, wrong thread or something good night.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:10 (nineteen years ago) link

(w/r/t my last post not yr very sad one rjg)

Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Look, this thread is all wrong. This is not the ILE I know. You people are supposed to adore, like, Casino and Heat and stuff! Not fucking Goodfellas! It's like saying your favorite Tarantino film is Pulp Fiction nOOOOOOO.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I luv Heat.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh shit! you know what does Goodfellas better than Goodfellas does? The Sandlot, and THE WONDER YEARS. FUCK YOOUOUUUUUU

(I love heat too)

Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:14 (nineteen years ago) link

so, this is how the new meaning of "alternative" came about.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh for God's sake, can't you all be big enough to say 'I was wrong'? Goodfellas MICTURATES on your fucking 'Heat'.

ENRG (Enrique), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Heat rocks hard.

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 19 August 2004 10:20 (nineteen years ago) link

casino kinda falls apart in the last act don't you find

I would really like someone to point me towards any of these films where that ISN'T the case. I mean any story about mobsters spanning multiple decades is going to be shit at the end, there is nothing climactic about watching some wiseguy get old, lose his edge and get thrown in the clink / murdered by his own stooges / enter the witness protection program. This is why Scarface is the best one, it goes out on a high note, you don't have to sit through a bunch of Tony and Manolo's midlife anecdotes or a succession of pointless relationships with mousy gold-digging bitches.

I think I see what Nick is saying about Goodfellas, and that goes for a lot of other similar movies with me as well. At the end of the day it's still a story about an asshole and his asshole friends, I mean Ray Liotta as Henry Hill has to be one of the least compelling characters I've ever seen, the fucking rat should get beaten to death.

DeNiro and Pacino are great because they can play these asshole characters and make them incredibly compelling, Pesci less so but still about a thousand times better than Ray fucking Liotta. I guess since Henry Hill is himself a pathetic excuse for a human being it's appropriate to cast the most uncharismatic man this side of the Baldwin brothers to play him but that does not make it any more enjoyable. Then again if you are watching Goodfellas for Ray Liotta you need your head examined.

What I've learned from this thread: Gangster movies need more 80s music. Did you know Brian DePalma directed the video for "Dancing In The Dark?"

TOMBOT, Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I haven't seen After Hours but is it anything like the new Streets album?

TOMBOT, Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:20 (nineteen years ago) link

And Good Lord, fuck After Hours at the same time. Is that all there is? He goes to work covered in paint, huzzah for metaphors.

That's all you took from the film? You're a bozo.

"Goodfellas" is a great film, as I've said, but it's just yet another mob movie. Do we really need more of those?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:22 (nineteen years ago) link

If they're good, yes.

ENRG (Enrique), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:26 (nineteen years ago) link

OK there are exactly 2 movies that Ray Liotta is good in, and this is definitely one of them, that's completely mentalist.

Also Heat is a Michael Mann film, why are we talking about Heat at all, briefly?

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Apparently it's 'too obvious' to prefer to 'Goodfellas' to 'Heat' or the CLEARLY INFERIOR 'Casino'...

ENRG (Enrique), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:33 (nineteen years ago) link

OK the only problem with the compellingness of the acting in Goodfellas from my point of view is that I sometimes find it hard to believe it's actually acting and not just Liotta, DeNiro, Pesci and Sorvino calling each other the wrong names for 3 hours.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Operation Dumbo Drop?

TOMBOT, Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Also GF is bad because it's THREE HOURS LONG and the only way a film can justify that is if it's got dragons and/or werewolves in it.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Dude, no, Field of Dreams. His portrayal of Joe Jackson is fucking incredible. I mean, the entire character bears absolutely no resemblance to Joe Jackson whatsoever, it's amazing. "Let's take this character of an illiterate, sort of slow-witted, very nice Southerner and have him played by...RAY LIOTTA!!!!!!"

xpost or lots of blood and drugs, see also Scarface!

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Although I haven't seen Operation Dumbo Drop, he could be excellent in it.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha, I've never watched Scarface all the way through cos "it's just more gangster shit" innit!

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:44 (nineteen years ago) link

A Bronx Tale

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Are there dragons?

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:50 (nineteen years ago) link

See, Reign Of Fire could have been SO DAMN GOOD and it just fuXXored it all up.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 19 August 2004 13:50 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.