New Apple Lust Objects for 2010 and onward

It's for making videophonecalls from your bed like the My Two Dad's dude in Aliens.

what if you wore it around your neck on a chain

Cold Paddin' with S1ock

I kind of agree with slocki but then I think what if I'm browsing ilx at home and someone posts a sendspace? seems a bit silly to have to grab my laptop and so in which case why aren't I just browsing on it in the first place

http://jezebel.com/5458338/that-time-of-the-month-the-internets-best-period+related-ipad-jokes

what about those crazy harmony remote controls? I could see some dude with a $1000 remote control doing the math, though what kind of dude who can spend $1k on a remote control cares about saving $?

I kind of agree with slocki but then I think what if I'm browsing ilx at home and someone posts a sendspace? seems a bit silly to have to grab my laptop and so in which case why aren't I just browsing on it in the first place

― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:00 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i think what you're supposed to do in that situation is just start crying uncontrollably

i am already crying

If it's a Kaoss pad, robust field photo editor, etc that also just happens to play music and surfs the web anywhere, then fuck yeah that's cheap as hell.

Yeah, the presentation for this was actually kinda stodgy outside of the Brushes demo. Mail, web surfing, BFD.

Old-school Apple nerds getting older...

I presume you'll be able to control games on this using the iphone/touch?

has there been any chat abt multitasking coming to iphone in 4.0 btw?

Pornography
It's simple: You can hold something that weighs 1.5 pounds in one hand.

you want them to wheel out john mayer with kid606 playing 6 ipads simultaneously?

to me this just looks like a cool fun thing to keep around the house or throw in my bag - not a replacement for my computer but a sort of sci-fi-style all-purpose entertainment/media/fuckin' around device. and i think there will be some really cool apps for it. not that different than a big ipod touch, no, but ipod touches and iphones have so much potential that is severely limited only by their screen space.

― scent of a wolfman (s1ocki), Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:49 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is otm

Yes.

qn: what happens when u watch game-changing film avatar 3D on this game-changing device

Dling sekrit "what's new" doc just now

what happens when u play video game adaptation (from app store) of game-changing film avatar 3D on this game-changing device

You will actually feel the Na'vi breathing in your ear.

qn: what happens when u watch game-changing film avatar 3D on this game-changing device

― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:18 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

probably a lot of games will change

A great consumer device, but the marketing is lacking as iWork for iPad doesn't really make it a laptop alternative.

I think they really needed to have more apps in development that they could soft announce, like Photoshop (lite) for iPad, etc.

That said, if Serato works out a way to run on this, I'll get it.

I already happily read books on my iPhone...

For now I'll enjoy my iPad mini.

i've got eucalyptus ON IPHONE and like it fine, but really it's just too small.

t/s: Min-iPad vs. Max-iPad

Apple (or someone) need to make something like a VR headset, except where you can see through the screens at what's outside. Then you can overlay your web pages/pr0n/3D music interface over whatever real world stuff you're doing.

http://content.ytmnd.com/content/1/c/1/1c1b22ccf07a9fdf757bd40593c4038a.gif

didja ever see avatar.....on ipaaaad????

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4012/4309378951_98fc41c232_o.gif

lol

First person to get a 3G iPad, set their Skype ringtone to Nokia tune, and shout "Yeah, on the iPhone. No, It's Rubbish" gets a pint from me

watching the apple promo on this, it makes the web surfing on this look pulse quickeningly good

http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1995/1101950703_400.jpg

I am so buying this the day it comes out.

I would hope you can have more icons in the dock at the bottom.

I am so buying this the day it comes out.

― Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:52 PM

^^ underwear farter

did not know about this
http://db.tidbits.com/article/10624

WTF is up with that bezel? Ugliest piece Apple has produced in ... erm ... a long time.

Both the Contacts and Maps apps look terrific. iPod and Photos very WTF.

One more thing: iPhone SDK 3.2 download? Am I blind? Where is the download link?

bezel isnt great looking but its practical. feels like the kind of thing that will get suddenly smaller and be one of those big deal v2 things.

you have to be a registered developer, etaeoe ($99).

keynote stream's up

cozen: that mode is fkn awesome; i've been using it for months

it's probably going to take about 10 minutes for somebody to hack this and load a full featured snow leopard install

I think I would look pretty psychotic using this in a balaklava, that's for sure

it's probably going to take about 10 minutes for somebody to hack this and load a full featured snow leopard install

[img src="http://media.bestofmicro.com/apple-a4-ipad-cpu,4-O-237336-13.jpg";]

Hrm.

http://media.bestofmicro.com/apple-a4-ipad-cpu,4-O-237336-13.jpg

probably wont be u to hack it, if u cant handle bbcode

it's probably x86 based?

I can also foresee about a bajillion of these getting cracked screens from being toted around in college bookbags

also world peace...in 5000 years

it's probably x86 based?

Doesn't anyone remember this?

Apple's bought itself a chip company, P.A. Semi, that could make chips for future iPods and iPhones. The company was founded by Dan Dobberpuhl, lead designer of Alpha chips, who last year announced a 64-bit dual core processor that is said to be about 300% more efficient than the nearest competition, using only 5 to 13 watts at 2GHz.

Products using the chips won't arrive for a year, at least, but we can assume that Apple wouldn't spend $278 million without some plans to use 'em soon as it made sense, and I'm sure Intel and ARM aren't stoked. The negotiations, which finished recently, took place in The Steve's home. Owning its own chip design is an interesting move. While the iPhone's had a lot of off the shelf componentry, it makes sense that working on its own internal hardware could yield better devices. Or a PowerPC repeat..which is the architecture I believe that the above processor is built on.

More research on that chip shows how it achieves such power efficiency. From Ars: "For instance, the chip sports over 25,000 clock gates so that clock pulses to different regions of the processor can be shut off dynamically to save power...All of the PA6T's major on-die components have their own separate clock and voltage domains, so that the L1, L2, DRAM controller, I/O subsystem, and each of the two cores can all be placed in different low-power states independently of one another."

So in a quick survey of people at work, roughly 49% love it and 49% think it sucks (I'm the sole neutral 2%). Same numbers as for the iPhone on its first release so I'm declaring it a hit.