At What Point In Your Life Did Your Personality Get "Set" (If Indeed, It Ever Did)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (226 of them)
People who seem to "change" personalities might just have a core personality akin to the carrier shell, constantly cementing new decor to their shell. Thus, in their changeability, they are unchanging.
Somebody's probably said this. I don't have time to read the whole thing until later.

Agreed, Beth.

Excepting a few lifetime hobbies/traits ('I like swimming.' 'I like books.' 'I love dogs.' ' I write for money.') and something of a soul-based ethical command center, I'd like to believe in constant change. Most people I know are like this, except they carry trappings (apartments, photos, stories) from other phases of their lives to keep them connected with their former selves. I can't quite get on board with the shell metaphor, but I'd endorse a hermit-crab alternative.

PS: Once I found a hermit crab on Martha's Vineyard. I brought it home, and it moved into a lightbulb. A year later he grew out of it, so I gave him a Dinty Moore can. Then I lost him but found him dead in the piano bench a week later. He smelled like canned stew.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:26 (seventeen years ago) link

It's useful to discard the notion that "people can change." How many miserable relationships struggle on because of people climging to this belief?

This is very very important. Behaviour can sometimes change, but never by trying to change someone.

(Though my fear is that my deep down personality is that I *am* just a permanent asshole, and everything else is just not very well learned social graces.)

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:27 (seventeen years ago) link

and it moved into a lightbulb

?? Did you break off the end so he could climb in? Wasn't it jagged?

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:29 (seventeen years ago) link

MsMisery: I was about to say! It's necessary that this happens but it's also suffocating in a way: we are forced by our surroundings to remain (be perceived) as we are because people have this set notion of how we are. You could say: move to somewhere else, but of course you drag those (mis)conceptions with you. You sort of force people to see you as others see you. But not completely of course. It's VERY fascinating in my opinion and I'm VERY aware of this since I have a young daughter. I really want her to develop her own personality but am aware I'm projecting some things. blablabalba

I think we do have a certain *constant self* but we are able to change the outside layers. It's very hard but possible, notice it when going in therapy and/or entering a new relationship.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:30 (seventeen years ago) link

I think I've always been pretty much the same, certainly never had a stage of being a rebel. I can't see myself becoming less of a pushover, more decisive, bolder etc any time soon. So, damn my personality is stuck. And as for the part that will always be with you, yes absolutely.

Though, I do think personality is fluid, and that people do 'change', just not me.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Most people I know are like this, except they carry trappings (apartments, photos, stories) from other phases of their lives to keep them connected with their former selves.

Which is definitely a trap or can be. It seems to be fitting in more and more with my belief of process over product.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, Ned. Photos and letters are especially deadly this way.

xxpost MsMisery: the light bulb was from my grandma's station wagon, it had (kind-of) a natural opening from where it had been not-too-gently removed from the car. Not too jagged. As the year went on, it got cooler-looking because bits of sand and food would get trapped inside with the crab and scratch patterns on the interior.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:33 (seventeen years ago) link

most interesting thing on this thread. . .

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh god, sucked in.
I've been thinking about this core-being issue a lot lately, mainly because it's the off-season, work-wise, and I've been taking long walks with my dog on the beach. The pleasure of it taps into my me-ness. I think that I'm not being child-like when I'm enjoying it, but rather, tapping into the inner self that was first defined in childhood. But that core-self is not age-defined, somehow. It doesn't feel young or old. It just is.

(Though my fear is that my deep down personality is that I *am* just a permanent asshole, and everything else is just not very well learned social graces.)

YOU ARE A WARRIOR QUEEN!!!!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:37 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, this has brought me back on re-reading:

When I look at a newborn baby I get a specific "feel" from them that remains as they grow up. Some core is there, watchful and detached, or open and bemused, whatever

Maybe this is U&K, that I'm trying to discuss personality on the basis of a rather too limited sample base. Mainly mine own, because that's the only personality I've known intimately through the course of its whole course. And one is always too intimately involved in one's own personality to see it, and its changes, clearly.

When you have a child, and watch them grow up, and their personality become established, grow, change or not, that must be a far more useful lesson in the actual roots and origins of personality - why I included parenthood as one of the list of life-changing things that really can permanently alter your outlook.

There is definitely a layer of my personality that was set and laid down by the time I was 14, 15. Another fairly permanent layer got set down at 22, with the decisions and experiences I had then. Since then, behavioural-wise, I'm not the same person at all, due to learning from experiences and hopefully growing. But in terms of interests, patterns of thinking, quirks, tastes, the way I move through life hasn't changed a bit.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:37 (seventeen years ago) link

keep in mind that you rewrite history; you will say: ah yeah my kid was already like that as a baby...

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link

The pleasure of it taps into my me-ness. I think that I'm not being child-like when I'm enjoying it, but rather, tapping into the inner self that was first defined in childhood. But that core-self is not age-defined, somehow. It doesn't feel young or old. It just is

This is really resonating with me. I like this idea/image a lot.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, Ned. Photos and letters are especially deadly this way.

Which is why I try to avoid looking back at them! Obviously I write and receive a lot of letters and take thousands of photos now (thank you digital age) but in both cases they're not things I recheck much if at all. Something like Flickr is handy because it gives me a space for photos that others might find of interest, but I'm not bound to look through them myself. I'd rather look through others'!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link

As for parenting changing you—I don't think it does, really. The Bean that nurtured his hermit crab so inventively is the same Bean who may someday parent a child if he isn't already.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link

It's useful to discard the notion that "people can change." How many miserable relationships struggle on because of people climging to this belief?

This I don't agree with. People do change, but only with extreme self-motivation and lots of time. Always intrinsically. It's a rule of thumb of mine to trust people to what I call (and is probably more eloquently titled elsewhere) 'the law of minimal effective action.' As I've observed, people will set inconcrete goals for themselves, and do as little as they can to achieve them. Goals are so specific and idiosyncratic 'I want an antique Beemer' or 'This year I should become the greatest linotypist in the world' or 'I'd feel more complete with a Zoroastrian girlfriend' that people are forced to change themselves, sometimes, in pursuit of these things. When they reach their desires they change mostly back to the way they were. Mostly. But some of the new self they tried on in pursuit of their X sticks to them. Over time, the accumulation of all these little adjustments, possibilities, makes them/us wider people, with a stranger band of possible actions, a broader selection of selves to use, and a more global personality.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:41 (seventeen years ago) link

So you don't think that having children made you look at yourself - or indeed the *nature* of personality, on discovering your kids inborn personalities - differently?

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:42 (seventeen years ago) link

I get it comes down to which layer of the onion are we talking about. Having children made me feel more of a global citizen. I felt huge, painful empathy for other parents whose tragedies I read about in the paper. I fell in love with my kids as passionately as I was with their father, which taught me about passion and the elasticity of the heart, not that I'm a bigamist now or anything.
But the deep layer was unchanged. The me that walks the beach. You have to keep all the layers in good shape, I guess. Your social skills and your core bond-with-the-earth.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago) link

I GUESS.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago) link

The carbon-based organism AND the perfect hostess!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:49 (seventeen years ago) link

I like your thinking a lot. A lot of good things to contemplate.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago) link

"As for parenting changing you—I don't think it does, really."

i see the change when i'm with my parents. now i'm staying with'em in tokyo and i already became "someone else." ;-)

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Hrm, maybe a lot of the debate on this thread comes from a conflation of the concept of 'core values' with 'personality'? Or maybe I'm resistant to recognizing that they're the same thing?

I'd like to think that the former is a fixed quantity: we, by and large, always believe X is right and Y is wrong. With some jiggling. But the latter? Personality? defined in my world as an individual set of most-probable actions, responses, and patterns for behavior. Mutable, and in flux, but with defined likelihoods and wheel-ruts from constant travel.

The 'deep layer' you talk about, Beth, seems more like a soul to me than a personality.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

PS: I don't collect yellow stones, but I have over 60 perfectly round moonstones I'm saving to skip with my kids someday.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:52 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost
so how much is the latter an expression of the former?

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Hrm, maybe a lot of the debate on this thread comes from a conflation of the concept of 'core values' with 'personality'? Or maybe I'm resistant to recognizing that they're the same thing?

I'd like to think that the former is a fixed quantity: we, by and large, always believe X is right and Y is wrong. With some jiggling. But the latter? Personality? defined in my world as an individual set of most-probable actions, responses, and patterns for behavior. Mutable, and in flux, but with defined likelihoods and wheel-ruts from constant travel.

No, see I see those core values as the core personality. The other stuff is pretty much the behaviour. The personality is the thing that doesn't change. Everything else gets tossed in the whirlwind of manic depression, that's behaviour, moods, changing things.

I have to believe that the core is the real thing, the immutable thing. Because the behaviour outside bit is so mutable - if I were to go by that, living on 3 continents by the time I was 10, 14 schools in 12 years, dozens of jobs, possibly 50 or more lovers - my god, I wouldn't exist if I called all that my personality.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I wouldn't be a person at all, I'd be just a probability smear of possible quantum Katehood.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago) link

What's wrong with that? I find that idea comforting, personally.


(xpost) I think personality is an expression of core values, but I also think the tools we use, and the modes of expression we access are unchanging.

Example: SomeZ is on a deep private level unsure of her personal worth. Early in Z's life, there's a lot of bragging, brash adolescent silliness. Even some bullying. But Z grows out of that. As a twenty-something Z feels constantly depressed. Maybe seeks some therapy?? 30s? Z's clinging to a loveless marriage. 40s? Kids, new career, workaholic, making herself indispensible to her clients. 50s? Burnt out, feeling unappreciated, drops out of life a little bit. 60s? Joins a hippie church... doesn't love it, but the people are kind., etc. Always the same person, same drives... but two to people who meet her twenty years apart she might seem 100% different, though always with the same center, same ideals, same core of conscience.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link

(but, Kate, I think we're disagreeing mostly over semantics here)

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:03 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost - But did you behave differently in all those situations?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:06 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post **x-post to Dr C : Older and wiser, definitely. Modifying dangerous behaviour to avoid falling into the same pitfalls as before, and to consciously make an effort not to do something which you know would hurt yourself - and, perhaps more importantly, would hurt others - shows a really admirable strength of character**

thanks CJ. Yes, not to hurt others is urgent and key here.

**why I included parenthood as one of the list of life-changing things that really can permanently alter your outlook.** said Kate.

It's probably the biggest life-change. Suddenly you are totally responsible for them, they totally depend on you. You're responsible for everything from the basics like warmth, shelter, food, safety etc to making provision for their future, teaching them how to navigate their way through physical and emotional changes.

Thinking about it, and going back on what I said before, maybe that does change your personality. You can't act it out, but I guess for the vast majority the bond is so instant and strong that you don't need to. I became more patient, more empathetic, probably more 'gentle' after having children. These maybe go deeper than just new behaviour.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:07 (seventeen years ago) link

Suddenly you are totally responsible for them, they totally depend on you.

I think this prospect alone is enough to make me never want kids, to a large extent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe we are arguing over semantics, Bean, in that we agree that there is a core that does not change, and an envelope that does.

I think personality is an expression of core values, but I also think the tools we use, and the modes of expression we access are unchanging.

Example: SomeZ is on a deep private level unsure of her personal worth. Early in Z's life, there's a lot of bragging, brash adolescent silliness. Even some bullying. But Z grows out of that. As a twenty-something Z feels constantly depressed. Maybe seeks some therapy?? 30s? Z's clinging to a loveless marriage. 40s? Kids, new career, workaholic, making herself indispensible to her clients. 50s? Burnt out, feeling unappreciated, drops out of life a little bit. 60s? Joins a hippie church... doesn't love it, but the people are kind., etc. Always the same person, same drives... but two to people who meet her twenty years apart she might seem 100% different, though always with the same center, same ideals, same core of conscience.

This actually makes some kind of sense - to an outside observer it would appear that Z is changing her personality like a fashion accessory, but there is a deep core level personality which is not changing, but finding different expressions. Gives me more understanding of why a person would *be* like that.

But this goes back to the same friend I was having the discussion of "falseness" with. My life has been constant flux, I am always looking for things that are the same. Other people, whose lives have been stable sameness are often looking for the differences, the exceptions, the things that change.

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:13 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post Ned : I am always careful not to foist kid-talk on those who have chosen not to have them, so I don't gush about them much. I respect and understand those who don't want children. For me though it's by far the best thing I have ever done - the care and responsibility that you have to give them IS quite frightening. But not as humbling as the quality and quantity of love that they give you back.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:17 (seventeen years ago) link

My knee-jerk barren-not-by-choice reaction to anyone who refers to having kids as the "best thing they ever did" or "biggest accomplishment" (you'd be surprised how many people put this in the Guardian 20 Questions column) is this wave of rage and annoyance along the lines of "you insufferable smug bastard, anyone with a functional ovary or testes can have children, how can *that* be an accomplishment?"

But when I read things like you, Dr. C, and Beth Parker have just written, I am kind of awestruck that people manage to do it. Respect.

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:22 (seventeen years ago) link

as smarmy as it sounds, it is true: Anyone can have a child, not all of those people can actually be parents.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:24 (seventeen years ago) link

But not as humbling as the quality and quantity of love that they give you back.

And when the kids are older The REAL humbler is the realization one what a one-way street parent-child love evolves into. My love for my kids is so devouring and greedy—no way they can love me back that way. They're going to love their own lovers and kids that way. They love me in their way, and certainly want me to BE there, but I still can barely keep my hands off them. It's not useful love for them—that smothering thing, so I'm always curbing it. Stopping myself from asking constant questions, etc. They need some separation!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Like, do you love YOUR mother the way you love your kids? It changes into duty, concern, a type of friendship with strings, etc. But believe me, she's still NUTS about you!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Off-topic, sorry.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post Kate - they put these things because, for them, they're true. The function of reproducing is obv not much to boast about, you're right. But *parenting* maybe is a worthwhile accomplishment. How does anyone do it right? I have been a terrible parent in many ways -but my children are wonderful - wise, funny, kind, loving, tolerant.

You're right Beth - I see that distancing starting in my son (aged 14).

I'm a bit of a wreck today. The emotional floodgates that I referred to way upthread may well open wide unless I get off the thread and do something constructive.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

I hope mine doesn't get "set" this week, it's kind of fucked up.

case of the mutual heart friendship (onimo), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link

Sometimes the hungry love comes back around post-teenage-hood, though! My mother...I would like to eat her up and keep her forever, make us one, never lose the part of me that is her and vice versa. Oh god, I can't think about this at work.

Anyway I don't have children, but I think I understand.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Like, do you love YOUR mother the way you love your kids? It changes into duty, concern, a type of friendship with strings, etc. But believe me, she's still NUTS about you!

It's good you feel that way about your kids Beth. B/c I'm not sure all parents do.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Sometimes the hungry love comes back around post-teenage-hood, though! My mother...I would like to eat her up and keep her forever, make us one, never lose the part of me that is her and vice versa.

Yes, pretty OTM once you get past the traumas of adolescence and the necessary separation.

Sometimes I can't stand my mother, sometimes she drives me insane, but I still love her so much I just can't contemplate ever being without me. So much it scares me sometimes. And that's when I get cranky and distancing, maybe. Because I'm scared of losing that love.

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post Don't forget a nice, nourishing meal, you basket-cases! It will give you a sense of well-being. There. ILXors won't be smothered by my nurture.

I think most parents love their kids massively, even if they're incompetent at putting it into practice. The desire for touch is a very animal thing, the licking of the cubs, regurgitating of food into their mouths, etc.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

that's like the saddest thing I've read today, Beth. Also: why I'm afraid of having kids! As a teacher I often feel a fainter shade of what you're referring to. Watching the kids get picked up at the end of the day, to go home to be loved. And return the love. But at the same time, I'd be ineffective teacher if I felt that too frequently. It's just the sad lot of the caretaker to suffer the whimsy and folly of her/his charges. I imagine this is how great deities must feel.

And Laurel's right: I adore both of my parents. Complicated, sure, but without reserve.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Sorry, distracted by a phone call:

I don't gush about them much

Oh don't worry, please, I wasn't complaining at all! I have so many friends with kids and I love them all -- it's great to be an unofficial uncle to so many around here in particular. But as was noted, it takes a certain kind of person to be a parent -- I don't think I am, though I've been told otherwise. In sum: Dr. C, feel free to talk about yer kids whenever. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Smothering! Oy, my favorite topic. Apparently I am under the impression that everyone I love needs another mother. Anyway, carry on.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Sometimes I get scared when I contemplate having kids (even though I know it's never going to happen now) - that I could never cope loving someone that much, being that attached to someone.

But I also know, from my too brief experience of being pregnant, that it's not really something you get a choice in, that it's very powerful and primal and hormonal. You can express that love badly, you can mingle it with resentment and other emotions, but it's something that happens on a neurotransmitter level, not a logical level.

Oh, this is making me very sad now. :-(

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I think most parents love their kids massively, even if they're incompetent at putting it into practice. The desire for touch is a very animal thing, the licking of the cubs, regurgitating of food into their mouths, etc.

I wonder about this often in the case of abusive/neglectufl parents. You can chalk their actions up to their own emotional/mental issues but when that treatment of their children never changes. . .when they never acknowledge it, fix it, own up to it?

I can't say I have any massive love for my parents. My mother, yes some, but largely out of obligation. I'm not sure what I'll feel when she dies, probably some guilt, not sure. Overall I've made peace with keeping her at arm's length and disenganging her from my emotions and life as much as possible. She seems to have no problem with this and has never had much to do with my life anyway. I wish my father was already dead.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link

The desire for touch is a very animal thing, the licking of the cubs, regurgitating of food into their mouths, etc.

I now look back on childhood memories of dinner through a much different viewpoint.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:47 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.