Does being an "opening act" for a bigger act really provide as much valuable exposure as is assumed?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (78 of them)

I'm not sure how much the audience knew about that, though. Certainly the press made it clear but this was a stadium show and in Atlanta no less; how many of them read the papers? (That's mostly sarcastic.) In any case "Cult of Personality" was already a huge single, and I think Jagger came prancing out during "Glamour Boys", though I'm not 100% sure that wasn't a dream.

Euler, Saturday, 6 February 2010 15:06 (fourteen years ago) link

It's Laotian for "mullet."

hahahahaha

vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Saturday, 6 February 2010 18:39 (fourteen years ago) link

Does anyone know: how is it decided when a band has an opening act that tours w/them verses having some local act from every spot on the tour open for them? I've found a lot of new bands I liked when a band has an opening act that tours w/them, but I've never found love for a local band that got scrounged up to play before the show. The worst example of this was when some generic coffeeshop acoustic open-mic type guy opened for Sleepytime Gorilla Museum in Boise. I happen to know how that one happened, tho – he was the husband of the lady who booked them. Nils still went out of his way to congratulate the guy & say, "Pick up his CD, he's been very gracious" but I think that is bcz they are probably one of the fan-friendliest and politest groups this side south of Andrew W.K.

vacation to outer darkness (Abbott), Saturday, 6 February 2010 18:43 (fourteen years ago) link

Well it seems it worked out just fine for Kraftwerk and Sigur Ros when they were opening acts for Radiohead.

Moka, Saturday, 6 February 2010 18:48 (fourteen years ago) link

Isn't the deal on those Ozzfests that all of the smaller bands pretty much either had to pay or get no pay to be on that tour?

earlnash, Saturday, 6 February 2010 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

But shouldn't it be pretty much the same deal opening for the Stones as it is for pretty much any other big-name arena rock acts, like U2, Coldplay, Springsteen, etc.?

Never had the misfortune of seeing U2 or Coldplay, but whenever I've seen Springsteen he's never had a support act. Doesn't believe in them, apparently. With his own shows running 3hrs plus, there isn't time for one anyway.

Peter Hammill is another one who doesn't do support acts. Back in 1983, for some unfathomable reason, he chose to accept an offer from Hammill fan Fish to open for Marillion. He got booed for his trouble.

Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark got hugely valuable exposure by supporting Gary Numan on his first headline tour. It's always rankled with him – rightly in my view – that they've never acknowledged this debt to him.

anagram, Saturday, 6 February 2010 22:13 (fourteen years ago) link

I may be remembering wrong, but wasn't there something about Sonic Youth, when they were opening for Neil Young...his soundmen wouldn't give them full volume during their set, so they were kind of automatically blown off the stage by Young. Who was a fan of them, to be sure...

dlp9001, Saturday, 6 February 2010 23:21 (fourteen years ago) link

Yep! There's more detail here...from SY's perspective mostly. http://www.thrasherswheat.org/jammin/sonic_youth_noise.htm

As far as general thread topic: first time I ever saw Drive By Truckers was when they were opening for the Black Crowes. Hardly anyone in the audience, but the people who were there were NUTS for the DBT's (ie on their feet for the very first song, sang every word, etc etc), and it was their enthusiasm that made me hang around to see what the big deal was. Glad I did. Found out about Dead Confederate when they opened for the Truckers a couple of years ago here in Sacramento. I really think it does provide good exposure...not tons, but if you're good enough you might get a few new fans in each city. Those small numbers add up.

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 7 February 2010 04:45 (fourteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

"I really think it does provide good exposure...not tons, but if you're good enough you might get a few new fans in each city. Those small numbers add up."

word. there's always a few music nerds who come to check out the opening act (like, maybe even a thousand!) that it's probably worth the indifference/hostility of everyone else... specially since it's those opening act checker outers that are buying 10 albums for every one the lon ghai rin mullethead dude buys...

messiahwannabe, Wednesday, 24 February 2010 17:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Hoe boy. The old "buy-on" trick. It's actually shockingly routine, not so much with really big bands with those middling-level bands that still need some up-front cash injection to get them on a proper headline tour.

Usually support bands are matched by sharing a record company or management - but don't assume there hasn't been a buy-on even if they do share. (Even if it's books-fiddling of moving money from one account to another. So much of the money shuttled around at major labels doesn't actually exist, it's "to be recouped" and added to the band's bill.)

Does being a support act provide valuable exposure? If your music is compatible and the fanbase likely to overlap, hell yeah. We sold more CDs on 2 dates of a big-name tour than our record company sold officially through distribution channels (well, according to their books, that is.) But that wasn't a buy-on, that was a friends of a friend that invited us to do it.

There's Always Been A Dance Element To (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 24 February 2010 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost to Anagram - I saw Hammill supporting Marillion. I was just a kid. Was bored shitless (as was entire crowd). Rather suspect I'd find him infinitely preferable if I attended the same show now.

ithappens, Wednesday, 24 February 2010 17:55 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.