US POLITICS: AMERICANS, PLEASE WELCOME YOUR NEW PRESIDENT... SCOTT BROWN!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4572 of them)

the notion of "bipartisanship" and upset over "the same-old-same-old" is all contrived nonsense.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link

sorry, that was hasty. "bipartisanship" isn't nonsense, but the way it's employed these days, it is.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link

(yes gbx, good call on the article http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande)

voices from the manstep (brownie), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

nah that is just childish. thumbs down.

goole, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:11 (fourteen years ago) link

The whole thing w/ abortion costs being inflated -----> deterred abortions should be undermined by anyone who realizes that a 50+ year cost burden is nothing compared to a 1000.00 (hypothetical) solution.

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:16 (fourteen years ago) link

polls are open guys

http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/imgad?id=CJHR1Oq2uLv1FBCsAhjvATII_xAOIuc8um4

am0n, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:16 (fourteen years ago) link

Bipartisanship has only worked in exceptional cases, Daniel. Most revolutionary legislation has passed in this country with one party steamrolling the opposition.

Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link

agreed. btw, totally want palin to be the 2012 gop nominee.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

well, tbf, a lot of it passed when party discipline was a lot less stringent than it is now, and when the parties themselves had recognizable geographic/interest blocs

max, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

*votes 4 sarah*

vag gangsta (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

is party discipline "more stringent" now? the democrats certainly don't seem to have good party discipline.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link

dems have poor discipline only in comparison to the GOP--and when you have huge majorities the way dems do its much harder to keep yr whole party in line (not to mention its easier to keep a party in line on the opposition).

but compare now to the first half of this century--big divisions in both parties, usually geographical

max, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

when you have huge majorities the way dems do its much harder to keep yr whole party in line

yeah, this is absolutely right. it's what's complicated the push for HCR.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link

anyway party discipline doesnt bug me--what bugs is that weve got parties voting, more or less, in lock step, but the mechanisms and procedures of (the upper house of) our gov't arent designed for that kind of parliamentary-style party-line voting

max, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 21:26 (fourteen years ago) link

I haven't kept up. Did the "Miss me yet?" Bush billboard make an appearance on the thread yet?

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2010/02/bush_miss_me_yet_author_author.html

I saw the fucker when I was in MN last month. Made me rant all the way to the Twin Cities.

i am under no illusions that my opinions are even that interesting to me (dan m), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link

This is awesome: http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/exclusive-sarah-palins-debut-motivat

El Poopo Loco (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:07 (fourteen years ago) link

How lovely, and bonus karma points for the venue, the Toyota Center.

spay or neuter your blue dog (suzy), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:15 (fourteen years ago) link

fox keeps playing this promo for tonight's hannity show "is sarah palin running for president? she isn't saying.." but every time it's been on, i've only heard it before looking at the screen to read the actual words, so at first i thought they said "is sarah palin running for president? she's insane."

kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:52 (fourteen years ago) link

fox & friends had a bunch of lingerie models on today, brian and steve were so embarrassing i had to turn the volume all the way down

max, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:53 (fourteen years ago) link

so u could concentrate on the lingerie models

vag gangsta (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 00:56 (fourteen years ago) link

i secretly really like brian. i can't explain this. he's such a good sport about being silly on tv. doocy seems to have this not-so-well-hidden bitter, angry streak. not that i actually watch the show, at that hour i can only tolerate the npr.

kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 01:42 (fourteen years ago) link

brian is my fave by a long shot--steve is an asshole, plain and simple

max, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 01:44 (fourteen years ago) link

gretchen is incomprehensible. the daily show segment on her was one of my favorite things theyve ever done.

max, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 01:45 (fourteen years ago) link

so u could concentrate on the lingerie models

yes i would concentrate on the lingerie models

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 10 February 2010 01:50 (fourteen years ago) link

doocy seems to have this not-so-well-hidden bitter, angry streak.

totally. he's like the conservative gumby ("i'm doocy dammit").

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 10 February 2010 01:51 (fourteen years ago) link

the daily show ran a thing a while back about how steve & brian turned into drooling mongoloids when then had the lingerie football league players (iirc) on the show

birther blood (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 02:55 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah and then gretchen comes out like "this is the best thing ever on tv!!!!"

harbl, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 02:57 (fourteen years ago) link

i was looking for that clip but this one is funnier
double entendres

kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 03:22 (fourteen years ago) link

so what do we make of this

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/clinton-voters-jump-ship

voices from the manstep (brownie), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 03:45 (fourteen years ago) link

It means that whoever wrote this:

Reviewing the primary fight, Michael Barone noted that Obama got majorities “from whites only in his home state (Illinois), in states where the white Democratic primary electorate is unusually upscale and non-Jewish (Virginia, Vermont), and in mountain states where the cultural divide is not black-white.” This racial divide, Barone explained, was part of a larger, cultural divide between Jacksonians and academics. “In state after state, we have seen Obama do extraordinarily well in academic and state capital enclaves. In state after state, we have seen Clinton do extraordinarily well in enclaves dominated by Jacksonians.

...is an imbecile.

Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 03:49 (fourteen years ago) link

is Buchanan County really that important? serious question

voices from the manstep (brownie), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 03:52 (fourteen years ago) link

seems like a good way for conservatives to stir up shit from the primaries (which a lot of people have not gotten over) by talking about 'clinton voters' and to do some pretty questionable analysis on three statewide races in which obama was not the candidate, the candidates themselves were not popular, some of them sucked at being candidates, the issues in the campaigns were different, and corzine's approval rating as governor was like in the low 30s because of NJ specific issues.

kicker conspiracy (b. favre ha ha) (daria-g), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 05:26 (fourteen years ago) link

The Bush "miss me yet" is evidence towards my long-held suspicion that if W had the ability to run a third time he would actually have a good chance of winning. And yes I think that little of my fellow countrymen and women.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 05:50 (fourteen years ago) link

upon further reflection, and seeing the video of her checking it...

come on guys. The notes on the hand thing was mega stupid. Quayle stupid. So stupid that it's fair, not just "gotcha," to bring it up in the context of "is this person so fucking dumb/out of it that she's unelectable?"

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 07:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Dont try to defend fox y fwiends. i assure you they are all repellant

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 07:58 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm seriously thinking back on it now as dumber than anything quayle did/said.

Maybe in time it's gonna sink in?

Did the rightwing media do as good of a job of brushing off his idiocy as they do Sarah's? I remember in my youth thinking that he was just a joke and would never be a serious presidential contender, and that this was the accepted narrative.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 07:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Labor's lost year:

For American labor, year one of Barack Obama's presidency has been close to an unmitigated disaster....

By my count, this marks the fourth time in the past half-century that labor's efforts to strengthen workers' ability to organize have been deferred by the Democratic presidents and the heavily Democratic Congresses they supported. In 1965, about the only piece of Great Society legislation not enacted was the repeal of the Taft-Hartley Act provision that gave states the power to block unions from claiming as members all the employees in workplaces where they had won contracts. In 1979, as American management was beginning to invest heavily in union-busting endeavors, the first effort to reform labor law failed to win cloture in the Senate by one vote as President Jimmy Carter stood idly by. In 1994, President Bill Clinton responded to a similar labor-backed effort by appointing a commission to recommend changes in labor law to the next Congress -- which turned out to be run by Newt Gingrich. And last year, by asking his labor supporters to wait, Obama ensured -- unintentionally, of course -- that the next effort to revive organizing must wait until the next overwhelmingly Democratic Congress....

What will life be like in an America with almost no private-sector unions or collective bargaining? We had a glimpse of that during George W. Bush's presidency, in which the unionization rate was already so low that median household incomes declined even as gross domestic product rose. It's also apparent that a deunionized private sector won't readily support -- politically or economically -- a unionized or expansive public sector....

No nation has ever been home to a middle-class majority absent a sizable labor movement. In their failure to advance labor's prospects, the Democrats condemn themselves to a future of fewer Democratic voters and their nation to a future of mass downward mobility.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/09/AR2010020902465.html

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:07 (fourteen years ago) link

I remember in my youth thinking that he was just a joke

Same here. I was 6-9 years old when he was VP, but even then, just by occasionally observing NBC nightly news in the background, I thought that he was a complete idiot.

^^potentially not true at all, sry^^ (Z S), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:07 (fourteen years ago) link

anybody who cites michael barone's analysis of anything approvingly, well, good luck to you

goole, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:12 (fourteen years ago) link

Quayle represented the statistical means of intelligence for a veep.

Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:12 (fourteen years ago) link

you're right about labor getting a shitty deal, and you'd also be right to blame the worst institution in the US, the senate, again:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-09/becker-labor-board-nomination-held-up-after-senate-cloture-vote.html

goole, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:14 (fourteen years ago) link

The capper on the whole hand-note thing is how she wrote "budget cuts" and put a line through "budget" and wrote "tax". Not only is it something a C-student would do when writing a paper in high school, it demonstrates the how little she has mentally invested in her policies.

Like she's presented this MADLIB: "Republicans have long stood for _______ cuts" and she writes budget. Despite the fact that she campaigned as the republican vice presidential candidate! She doesn't believe any of it, which is why she couldn't remember the easiest political MADLIB in the book!

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:22 (fourteen years ago) link

It also displays the imagination land that the GOP platform resides in, which is something Obama pointed out at the Q&A when reading from their health care reform package. You can cross out "budget" cuts and put in "tax" cuts and somehow there are no fiscal consequences. I want to see their math!

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:27 (fourteen years ago) link

If anything, the hand notes incident will probably just help Palin rather than harm her. I think a good portion of the country has moved from wanting a leader who is not an "elitist" to wanting someone who is demonstratively unintelligent and who goes to great lengths to show it. At this point, the more foolish and ignorant she looks, the more her profile goes up.

Moodles, Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:32 (fourteen years ago) link

"Last night Piper asked me to tell her a bedtime story and I said 'YOU BETCHA,' let me tell you about two brothers named Abel and Cain..."

by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 19:23 (fourteen years ago) link

want something horrible to happen to this lady and fast

sorry but it is true

by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

if you wish that, she can't be the GOP nominee in 2012. think of all the lozls that would be lost.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 10 February 2010 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.