US POLITICS: AMERICANS, PLEASE WELCOME YOUR NEW PRESIDENT... SCOTT BROWN!

Yeah it was total red meat - my mom and I were on the phone 'watching it together' like you do and she was responding to it like some stand-up routine. Palin's only shots are cheap ones.

― spay or neuter your blue dog (suzy), Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:44 PM (1 hour ago)

This is kind of why she worries me so much. I think our culture is shifting toward a frame of mind where the person with the best zings wins. Thanks, internet!

Also, she is more willing than any other prominent politician (Republican or Democrat) to go for pure red meat speeches that will say whatever underhanded things are necessary to get people to pay attention. Very few popular politicians are quite this shameless.

One of the amusing things about the whole palin tele prompter thing is that at the RNC 2 years back whe was completely incapable of learning how to work with one and most of all understanding that there was a man backstage somewhere controlling it and this was so it went at her speed as opposed to being there to regulate her speech. Her staff then built this into a minor blogosphere talking point to account for her terrible convention speech. It all probably had a lot to do with the fact that they assigned a cretinous campaign volunteer to be her teleprompter operator rather than employing a professional as they did for McCain and everyone else.

Ed, you should send that info to a responsible media outlet, maybe?

Take it from a zinger: snappy, mean comebacks are 'battle' victories, not 'war' victories. In a figure like Palin, who has not been subjected to the cross-examination most Americans expect an elected official to undergo, it really is all she's got because she can't be kept in that bubble of inaccessibility forever.

what's funny is that now she has the time to get the seasoning and policy briefings to become a serious politician, but she seemingly has no interest in it (given how she's behaved). becoming a serious politician is either above her capabilities or below her interest level, or both.

is it out of her reach or interest, or is it just that the less she does that kind of thing, the more her people love her? that's what bothers me the most about her, the ability to turn any condescension directed at her into one more reason she's just like them and getting picked on by all those assholes in the media.

yeah. all US politics can be understood this way:

And for those who don't get it? That was explained to me in late 2002 by Mark McKinnon, a longtime senior media adviser to Bush, who now runs his own consulting firm and helps the president. He started by challenging me. ''You think he's an idiot, don't you?'' I said, no, I didn't. ''No, you do, all of you do, up and down the West Coast, the East Coast, a few blocks in southern Manhattan called Wall Street. Let me clue you in. We don't care. You see, you're outnumbered 2 to 1 by folks in the big, wide middle of America, busy working people who don't read The New York Times or Washington Post or The L.A. Times. And you know what they like? They like the way he walks and the way he points, the way he exudes confidence. They have faith in him. And when you attack him for his malaprops, his jumbled syntax, it's good for us. Because you know what those folks don't like? They don't like you!'' In this instance, the final ''you,'' of course, meant the entire reality-based community.

(obviously about the 2004 bush/kerry election, but makes a useful point)

Whatever. The thing is, this worm can turn, because even when you're on the side of someone who cries victim with justification, if they start doing it all the fucking time, it lessens its effectiveness. In politics, it's throwing red meat to the opposition one meatball at a time.

Based on my own assessment of her personality, she's a great believer in the sound of her own voice and the 'you think you're better than us' rhetoric she points at anyone who condemns her lack of bona fides indicates she's the one with the superiority complex, but it's of the 'you're going to hell and I'm not' variety. Certitude like that means she's going to say that one thing that pisses off her handlers (and she does have neocon handlers) plus mainstream folksy folks and they'll find some other stooge that can actually read from a teleprompter to take their money and march in time.

generally, you're right. palin can't win a general election. depending on how things play out between now and 2012, she might be able to win the GOP nomination, tho.

can't imagine there wouldn't be sizable majority of folks (of all parties) that would be terrified at the thought of that woman at the levers of power.

sort of hope she just flames out in a sex scandal or something, or it turns out she's been poisoning her aides... something that will prevent her from seeming victimized.

though falling off the side of the earth would work too.

Pretty sure she thinks it's flat so that sounds like a plan, yo.

Esq: Nah. This time after the '04 cycle nobody thought Obama would run for anything except his second Senate bid. We seriously thought we might've been looking at a President Giuliani.

I really think much of what Obama's facing from the center-right is down to the authority they are willing to accept from a President who is black, whether this resistance is subliminal or public, stated or not. I'm sure Obama gets it (see: 'no sudden moves') but because of see above: victim shit, he just grits his teeth and gets on with it. Yes, it is frustratingly slow but previous Presidents had all that white privilege to carry the day, no joke (and Roosevelt was so patrician anything he did to help people was totally painted as noblesse oblige, not socialism).

roosevelt was accused of socialism in his day!

also of fascism!

We seriously thought we might've been looking at a President Giuliani.

ugh, never say those words.

Yeah, but to be fair there were numerous Socialists and an American Bund then and nobody tried to portray him as Hitler.

...ps PRIVILEGE means you get to do most of what you will regardless of criticism.

lol. hey, amateurist, you'll love this:

The snows that obliterated Washington in the past week interfered with many scheduled meetings, but they did not prevent the delivery of one important political message: Take Sarah Palin seriously.

Her lengthy Saturday night keynote address to the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville and her debut on the Sunday morning talk show circuit with Fox News' Chris Wallace showed off a public figure at the top of her game -- a politician who knows who she is and how to sell herself, even with notes on her palm.

_________________________________

Blessed with an enthusiastic audience of conservative activists, Palin used the Tea Party gathering and coverage on the cable networks to display the full repertoire she possesses, touching on national security, economics, fiscal and social policy, and every other area where she could draw a contrast with Barack Obama and point up what Republicans see as vulnerabilities in Washington.

Her invocation of "conservative principles and common-sense solutions" was perfectly conventional. What stood out in the eyes of TV-watching pols of both parties was the skill with which she drew a self-portrait that fit not just the wishes of the immediate audience but the mood of a significant slice of the broader electorate.

____________________________________

More important, she has locked herself firmly in the populist embrace that every skillful outsider candidate from George Wallace to Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan to Bill Clinton has utilized when running against "the political establishment."

______________________________________

This is a pitch-perfect recital of the populist message that has worked in campaigns past. There are times when the American people are looking for something more: for an Eisenhower, who liberated Europe; an FDR or a Kennedy or a Bush, all unashamed aristocrats; or an Obama, with eloquence and brains.

But in the present mood of the country, Palin is by all odds a threat to the more uptight Republican aspirants such as Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty -- and potentially, to Obama as well.

Palin did not wear well in the last campaign, especially in the suburbs where populism has a limited appeal. But when Wallace asked her about resigning the governorship with 17 months left in her term and whether she let her opponents drive her from office, she said, "Hell, no."

Those who want to stop her will need more ammunition than deriding her habit of writing on her hand. The lady is good.

davidsbroder!

This is a pitch-perfect recital of the populist message that has worked in campaigns past. There are times when the American people are looking for something more: for an Eisenhower, who liberated Europe; an FDR or a Kennedy or a Bush, all unashamed aristocrats; or an Obama, with eloquence and brains.

This is a tone-deaf reading of history.

Oh, Broder wrote this! That toolbag has been wrong wrong wrong so often he deserves an Oscar.

Haha! love the term "toolbag."

yeah David Broder is an idiot

davidsboner!

broder is wrong all the time. i thought her interview with wallace was awful.. it was chris matthews who pointed out a couple times this week that the really remarkable moment was when she said obama might win in 2012 if he 'played the war card' by either starting a war with iran, or supporting israel more (said just that vaguely). what in the world was she suggesting? the casual association of starting a war with winning an election..

also, found it - howard dean, jan 2004. at the time i recall Very Serious People in the media mostly disregarded whatever he said about religion, and tbh it was out of character for him to speak about it, but anyway:

''Don't you think Jerry Falwell reminds you a lot more of the Pharisees than he does of the teachings of Jesus?'' he added. ''And don't you think this campaign ought to be about evicting the money-changers from the temple?''

roosevelt was accused of socialism in his day!

― by another name (amateurist), Thursday, 11 February 2010 03:15 (2 hours ago) Permalink

also of fascism!

― by another name (amateurist), Thursday, 11 February 2010 03:15 (2 hours ago)

Quite fairly on both counts!

I mean, thank goodness he was president, but there were some... bad moments.

Well then.

Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, R-Fla., will announce this afternoon that he will not seek re-election, and his brother, Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, is expected to seek the seat, which is more Republican than ...

?? so if mario is taking lincoln's seat, who gets mario's?

those two guys are a treat btw

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a1gLeuUUbQy8

President Barack Obama said he is “agnostic” about raising taxes on households making less than $250,000 as part of a broad effort to rein in the budget deficit.
Obama, in a Feb. 9 Oval Office interview, said that a presidential commission on the budget needs to consider all options for reducing the deficit, including tax increases and cuts in spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

“The whole point of it is to make sure that all ideas are on the table,” the president said in the interview with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, which will appear on newsstands Friday. “So what I want to do is to be completely agnostic, in terms of solutions.”

Why can't we just tax rich people more? Surely they are not overtaxed yet--you know, the rich people that actually might pay taxes instead of "avoiding" them through tax shelters.

"Completely agnostic" hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhah

It's a shame I'm not in his district!

Palin's Poll Numbers Hit Historic Lows, even among Republicans.

boo

Although if she goes full-on third party and runs anyway, then YAY

huh it just occurred to me some other GOP nominee winner might be forced to put her on as VP again. if she would be ok with that is another question. but her level of very small but very committed support tends to make her basically a political zombie: can't win, can't be killed. i don't think we're ever going to be rid of her.

boo

i know, right? i can't bear the thought of the ardor cooling between palin and the gop. they are a perfect match imo.

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/twn_up_fls/sarah%20palin%20cycle%20twn.jpg

^^^ SEXIST FOTO

political zombie: can't win, can't be killed

so true

can we skip to the part where one of us brains her with a pickaxe

Is that your way of saying you wanna pork her?

yeah my general prejudice is that the GOP basically answers to a wall street-houston-pentagon axis that is really and truly interesting in ruling the earth. all that back-country populist stuff in a means to an electoral end; acceptable candidates have to be able to play that thing, but palin just IS the thing itself w/o any of the real imperial skills and so, no dice.

dude even I draw the line at fucking zombies

x-post

^^^ SEXIST FOTO

i do not deny it.

SEXIST SOTO

my general prejudice is that the Dems basically answer to a wall street-Microsoft-pentagon axis that is really and truly interesting in ruling the earth

or interested even

Don't forget the unions.

why not, the Dems have.

and, what's the one guy's name, rasheed kaleedy

haha I misread that as "unicorns" and was still like "... well that is kind of true"

http://bloghopenchangery.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/obama_victory_unicorn.jpg