US POLITICS: AMERICANS, PLEASE WELCOME YOUR NEW PRESIDENT... SCOTT BROWN!

that woman's bumper sticker is mean.

http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/9886/unseen.jpg

http://i385.photobucket.com/albums/oo295/appryl2/robert-de-niro-frankenstein--large-.jpg?t=1266617571

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v296/WilliamCrump63/cpac.jpg

http://i637.photobucket.com/albums/uu92/damien_stone/gallery-day2cpac14.jpg

Dave Matthews must eat brains

can't make out who any of the other people are

also lol @ "proud to be a teabagger". don't really need to shop that one for lols do you.

well none of them are blonde, which ~explains a lot~

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201002190044

CPAC speaker "condemn(s) CPAC for bringing" gay GOP group "to this event"

traet after traet

Maybe it's because even with a filibuster proof majority they failed on passing the most popular and desperately needed public policy of the past 50 years? That deep down people know it's not Fox News or the Tea Partiers they are bending over for, but the corporate vote?

Seriously fuck these people.

― Adam Bruneau, Friday, 19 February 2010 18:43 (4 hours ago)

They only had a filibuster proof majority if you consider Joe Lieberman a Democrat. Which he really isn't.

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201002190044

CPAC speaker "condemn(s) CPAC for bringing" gay GOP group "to this event"

traet after traet

― MY RUSTIC CHURCHWARDEN PIPE TOBACCOS; WITH RED T-SHIRT OF SURF (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, February 19, 2010 5:39 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dying at this one frankly

dont know that ive ever seen anyone try that hard before

Reid supports public option in reconciliation bill

!!!

oh goody i didnt realize he had a blog

http://ryansorba.blogspot.com/

eh... id guess reid is covering his bases the same way the WH is when it says itll support a public option "if senate leadership wants"

what is it about a certain brand of thick-necked asshole that just can't get enough of telling certain people that "we're enemies now" or "you're on my bad side now, buddy" or "you have no idea what you just started, pal" ... thinkin off the top of my head about the girls gone wild guy

wow his blog is amazing

The other side of genetic power today, is the future bondage of the living dead. How might this new and a-symmetrical power of the past over the future be shattered?

the intelligence of angels available on hard drives

On June 12th 2006, I gave a one hour talk, exposing the dark secrets of the homosexual political movement. The speech is entitled The Born "Gay" Hoax.

dude

i just did a quick look through.. it looks like he talks about butt sex for an entire hour

The man clearly needs help. Where is the clean-cut Republican intern/greying and trimly respectable father-figure who will toss his word salad?

"Guess what? Guess what? All right, guess what? Civil rights are grounded in natural rights," said Sorba. "Natural rights are grounded in human nature. Human nature is a rational substance in relationship. The intelligible end of the reproductive act is reproduction. Do you understand that? Civil rights, when they conflict with natural rights, are contrary -- hey, you sit down. The lesbians at Smith College protest better than you do. The lesbians at Smith College protest than you do. All right? Bring it."

he's like a right wing dat nigga delmar

i dont have sound here but i don't get that, why are people booing him? isn't it like a conservative rally?

lmao goole

What strikes me about that vid is the white-haired old guy at :42 who just looks like he doesn't know when this whole "upstanding conservative" thing got away from him. He doesn't appear to so much as bat an eyelash so it's possible he's deadasleep, but I think he looks sad.

lol n tears @ that sorba dude's blog. p similar to the dude who has the site about the masculinization of the female beauty standards

"you just made the list" lol

Human nature is a rational substance in relationship.
Human nature is a rational substance in relationship.
Human nature is a rational substance in relationship.
Human nature is a rational substance in relationship.

the intelligence of angels available on hard drives dude. alright? you just made the list.

you have even less angel-intelligence on your hard drive than the lesbians at smith college

guess what? guess what? alright guess what? i know the secret way to overturn roe v wade!!! i have the angel intelligence.

Human nature is a rational substance in relationship.

who is this, aquinas?

http://www2.bc.cc.ca.us/gdumler/English%205A/Pictures/Humours.gif

Sullivan's site posted a clip of a Cato Institute symposium which proves that British conservatives are more mature than ours. Please note how The Venerable Maggie Gallagher avoids every one of the Conservative MP's points.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/02/the-fate-of-gay-conservatism-ctd.html#more

worth reading:

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/the-coming-conservative-health-care-freakout

But the mustache-twirling bonhomie has started to give way to the realization that the legislative door to health care reform is wide open, and Democrats simply need to walk through it. By no means is it clear that they'll succeed. But I've been waiting for conservatives, filled with hubris at having swept liberalism into the dustbin of history, to wake up to the fact that health care reform is very far from dead, and start to freak out.

...

You can imagine how this feels to conservatives. They've already run off the field, sprayed themselves with champagne and taunted the losing team's fans. And now the other team is saying the game is still on and they have a good chance to win. There may be nothing wrong at all with the process, but it's certainly going to feel like some kind of crime to the right-wing. The Democrats may not win, but I'm pretty sure they're going to try. The conservative freakout is going to be something to behold.

Yeah, they have a problem with premature 'mission accomplished'.

to be fair, so does Obama (cf. the gloating emails OFA sent out regarding reform around New Year's).

Probably varying degrees of MI exist in the minds of all politicians.

why are both parties so afraid of changing the filibustering rules? i can understand the republicans' side as they usually manage to unite together, but what are democrats afraid of?

they know theyll be out of power soon/eventually

plus it means less power for the senate generally

how about palin/paul 2012? it's got a ring to it don't it

i mean there's your third party politics right there, morbs should be thrilled

paul is so far off the ideological reservation he seems nuts, but he's not ACTUALLY nuts. there's a funny serenity about him that looks like psychosis but i don't think he'd have anything to do with an actual psychotic.

i can't imagine any politician really wanting to play ball with her. what would you get for your trouble, a bunch of people who'd vote republican anyway? i bet all the staffs of every GOP pol look at what happened to steve schmidt and nicolle wallace and are like, no way.

not to credit her with any actual principles re: policy, but Paul's constant criticisms (which is like the only good thing about him imo) of US foreign policy and the military industrial complex certainly can't wit well with Yosemite Samantha

& goole otm

wit = sit

well the fantasy was good while it lasted

x-post

But the mustache-twirling bonhomie has started to give way to the realization that the legislative door to health care reform is wide open, and Democrats simply need to walk through it. By no means is it clear that they'll succeed -from the New Republic piece

Is there even a 50% chance of success with the running scared Senatorial Dems(and will it prevent insurers from continuing to raise rates by large numbers whenever they feel like it)