should the West invade and/or bomb the fuck out of Iran?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (316 of them)
Lots of people say that. I think it has to do with a misunderstanding involving the meaning of the word "allowed."

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:55 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah like, who are we asking?? if its up to me the answer is no!

,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:55 (eighteen years ago) link

if the US are allowed them then why the fuck aren't Iran?

you may be alarmed but a lot of people out there do seem to be asking this question.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:56 (eighteen years ago) link

Nuclear weapons held by a country seem like a kind of a bogey man... Mutually-assured-destruction. Anthrax, dirty bombs, infrastructure attacks .. are all a bigger threat than nuclear weapons because they're more likely to be used. And still, I'm more worried about getting mugged than I am about an international incident.

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:58 (eighteen years ago) link

Presumably the people in the Iranian govt. who want them see the question more as 'if Israel are allowed them why aren't we?'

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:59 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah. out of the US there is a world where people may not understand why some countries are allowed to have it and some aren't if all countries are equal...

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:00 (eighteen years ago) link

do japan have nuclear weapon then?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:01 (eighteen years ago) link

No, thank God

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:02 (eighteen years ago) link

no cos their constitution doesn't allow them to have it. although i've read recently that they have all the components to build one within a few weeks if necessary...

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:03 (eighteen years ago) link

not yet

Super Cub (Debito), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:03 (eighteen years ago) link

but Japan doesn't really need them, because it falls under America's nuclear umbrella.

Super Cub (Debito), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:04 (eighteen years ago) link

I would guess that the Japanese have an appreciation for limiting the amount of destruction by any single weapon.

So, which countries have nuclear warheads & delivery methods?

..And which countries have ever used one? .. (That's rhetorical.)

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:06 (eighteen years ago) link

I was just saying because Doglatin was predicting the middle east to become like japan in the next couple of decades. it'd be pretty fun if iran decides to attack the US with pro-evolution soccer.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:06 (eighteen years ago) link

no cos their constitution doesn't allow them to have it. although i've read recently that they have all the components to build one within a few weeks if necessary...

and i'll form the head!

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:06 (eighteen years ago) link

i dont see why not wanting the u.s. to have nukes means that iran should have them

,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:06 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm just sick of the issue already. Anyone in the UK see Powell being grilled by Paxman on Newsnight last night? Predictable, depressing stuff. Though his question about 'rendition' at the end seemed rather odd and cryptic.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:07 (eighteen years ago) link

it's the same brilliant logic that had the democrats essentially arguing for an invasion of north korea in 2003

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link

one of the greatest publicity for having a nuclear weapon was irak's invasion : if you don't have one, that's what happens to you (whereas, if you "may" have one -ie. north korea- the US won't invade you 2 times within a decade...).

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm just sick of the issue already.

fair enough, but can a sense of boredom prevail against the horror of seeing Iran invaded / seeing Iran drop a nuclear bomb on Baku?

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:10 (eighteen years ago) link

most of the right-wing talk radio circuit is more afraid of an EMP style blast.

In addition to other effects, a nuclear weapon detonated in or above the earth’s atmosphere can create an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), a high-density electrical field. An EMP acts like a stroke of lightning but is stronger, faster, and shorter. An EMP can seriously damage electronic devices connected to power sources or antennas. This includes communication systems, computers, electrical appliances, and automobile or aircraft ignition systems. The damage could range from a minor interruption to actual burnout of components. Most electronic equipment within 1,000 miles of a high-altitude nuclear detonation could be affected. Battery-powered radios with short antennas generally would not be affected. Although an EMP is unlikely to harm most people, it could harm those with pacemakers or other implanted electronic devices.

like the infrastructure-crippler list above, it wouldn't kill too many people directly, but it would cripple the hell out of the north america.

to use the words of some americans... "bomb them back to the stone age!"

military equipment is supposed to survive such an attack, but... the last EMP test was in the early 60s.

i'm not saying that's a good case. hardly. does iran even have the missle capability for a high altitude detonation over kansas or thereabouts?
m.

msp (mspa), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:13 (eighteen years ago) link

it's the same brilliant logic that had the democrats essentially arguing for an invasion of north korea in 2003

huh?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:19 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't think Iran has much of a missile program. But they can always buy missile technology from the North Koreans. They do missiles real good.

xpost

Super Cub (Debito), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:20 (eighteen years ago) link

bomb you long time

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link

fair enough, but can a sense of boredom prevail against the horror of seeing Iran invaded / seeing Iran drop a nuclear bomb on Baku?

it's not boredom just depression.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:24 (eighteen years ago) link

But they can always buy missile technology from the North Koreans. They do missiles real good.

or china.

it's nice to have beijing owning that nice big stack of american cash and bonds, i guess. way to go, dubya.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:25 (eighteen years ago) link

military equipment is supposed to survive such an attack, but... the last EMP test was in the early 60s

The electric field caused by the blast would be strong enough to reverse the flow of current through a transistor, thereby destroying all transistor-based electronic equipment, i.e. computers.

I believe the reason they don't do EMP tests anymore is because the military had vacuum-tube backups of all their computational equipment. Transitors built using vacuum tubes instead of semiconductors are more robust wrt voltage breakdown and would be expected to survive a nuclear attack. But by the 1960's, computers became too complicated -- building vacuum tube backups became impractical and therefore, there was no need to continue with EMP tests.

Now, they probably store important computer equipment in huge metal cages (and/or way underground) to keep out EM radiation.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:28 (eighteen years ago) link

i'd imagine that the israelis will take matters into their own hands if the "west" doesn't

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't think anyone in the White House or the Pentagon even wants to contemplate invasion as an option. I'd guess that the most likely use of force would be a targeted cruise missile strike.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:30 (eighteen years ago) link

Now, they probably store important computer equipment in huge metal cages (and/or way underground) to keep out EM radiation.

"probably"

:)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Now, they probably store important computer equipment in huge metal cages (and/or way underground) to keep out EM radiation

they just base all their computer equipment in Windows so that staff are well drilled on downtime procedures.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:34 (eighteen years ago) link

A lot of the worry may have to do with recent statements by the current Iranian leader implying that he wants to rid the world of Israel. (and I stress the word "implying".) If a country is making such rhetoric while at the same time amping up their nukes program, I don't see why it's difficult to understand why world leaders would be worried about this... all foils of recent U.S. world policy, aside.

Dom iNut (donut), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:35 (eighteen years ago) link

they should send in subway, wal-mart, and starbucks instead.
m.

msp (mspa), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:35 (eighteen years ago) link

But as with India vs Pakistan I assume that the implications of nuking Israel would have direct consequences on Iran given their relative proximity, or am I wrong there?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:37 (eighteen years ago) link

israel would fuck iran up, probably leading to a middle-east-sized war (at least)

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:43 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyone who wants to use nuclear weapons within a range that could affect their own region probably doesn't care too much about the consequences, frankly. Thatone cares more about accomplishing the mission.

Dom iNut (donut), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:43 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyone who wants to use nuclear weapons within a range that could affect their own region probably doesn't care too much about the consequences

Yeah but I'm seriously wondering whether these people really exist!

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah but I'm seriously wondering whether these people really exist!

well, yes. having nuclear capability to shit up your neighbour is not the same as having it with the intention of using it. it's the same as carrying a knife.

that said: as every wee ned up in court for murder knows only too well, "it just got out of hand" isn't much of an excuse when you've just stabbed someone to death.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh, a few do... that's the problem. xpost

Dom iNut (donut), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Transitors built using vacuum tubes instead of semiconductors are more robust wrt voltage breakdown and would be expected to survive a nuclear attack.


Not to be too much a of a pedant, but vacuum tubes are not transistors.

A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:10 (eighteen years ago) link

I know, I said "transistors built using vacuum tubes".

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:12 (eighteen years ago) link

So... would this reversed voltage thing happen to components that were not powered up during the EMP? Say you had a storeroom full of computers - would they all be ruined too?

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:13 (eighteen years ago) link

Transistors are inherently solid state. Vacuum tubes are not.

A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh I see what you're saying -- vacuum tubes preceded transistors, transistors = semiconductor based.

OK.

xpost

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:15 (eighteen years ago) link

So... would this reversed voltage thing happen to components that were not powered up during the EMP? Say you had a storeroom full of computers - would they all be ruined too?

Yes. It wouldn't matter if the equipment was turned on because the induced current from the explosion would be strong enough to ruin everything.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:18 (eighteen years ago) link

wow, this would kinda put a dent in the economy of the Silicon Valley, to put it mildly.

Dom iNut (donut), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 19:57 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah all the extra business from replacing computers for tonnes of businesses is really going to bust intel.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:05 (eighteen years ago) link

the other nastiness is just electrical power and cars not working right away.... and pumps and things on running water systems.

infrastructural nightmare, looting, etc.

"farm living is the life for me"?? the paranoid truth behind Green Acres.
m.

msp (mspa), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:06 (eighteen years ago) link

see y2k scare.
m.

msp (mspa), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Is there a term which can refer to both vacuum tubes and transistors?

A BOLD QUAHOG (ex machina), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:14 (eighteen years ago) link

"circuit components"

kingfish kuribo's shoe (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:17 (eighteen years ago) link

baha'i

the late great, Wednesday, 15 February 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago) link

i'm going to answer my own q by saying i'm pretty sure getting a job w/ in the intelligence community would require moving to some godawful place (ie outside california) but maybe somebody (tombot?) knows more about this than i do?

the late great, Wednesday, 15 February 2012 17:34 (twelve years ago) link

How's your Farsi?

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Wednesday, 15 February 2012 18:23 (twelve years ago) link

getting a job w/ in the intelligence community would require moving to some godawful place

Virginia?

max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 15 February 2012 18:26 (twelve years ago) link

farsi is fluent but i am illiterate

the late great, Wednesday, 15 February 2012 18:43 (twelve years ago) link

I'd rather see better translations in the news media. In the intelligence community your work will likely be ignored if you don't provide the politically approved translation.

Pauper Management Improved (Sanpaku), Wednesday, 15 February 2012 18:52 (twelve years ago) link

is this a good time for a patriotic, non-islamic iranian-american to apply for a job with the us intelligence community? would that be a power move?

oh hell yeah. how are you with battery cables?

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Wednesday, 15 February 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago) link

battery cables??

the late great, Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:05 (twelve years ago) link

ABC News was particularly disgusting yesterday: Martha Raddatz on a warship in the Strait of Hormuz aiming for that warmonger verite.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 February 2012 02:54 (twelve years ago) link

five months pass...

CNN drumbeat by Pentagon 'reporter' Chris Lawrence:

"Iran already has a missile that could reach the U.S. if it could put it on a ship and move it to within 600 miles of the American coastline."

http://www.salon.com/2012/07/16/cnn_on_the_iran_threat/

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Monday, 16 July 2012 13:57 (eleven years ago) link

and move it to within 600 miles of the American coastline.

Still more afraid of a suitcase bomb than this scenario.

Et tant pis pour Byzance puisque que j´ai vu Pigalle (Michael White), Monday, 16 July 2012 13:59 (eleven years ago) link

It's amazing how the range of Iran's missiles adjusts according to how badly we want to attack them.

Will Chave (Hurting 2), Monday, 16 July 2012 14:04 (eleven years ago) link

THE MISSILES ARE COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE.

Marco YOLO (Phil D.), Monday, 16 July 2012 14:09 (eleven years ago) link

Oh wait I didn't even read that link, shit is pretty lol

Will Chave (Hurting 2), Monday, 16 July 2012 14:14 (eleven years ago) link

i'm in the UK & i have a rock that could burrow a metre deep down into antarctic snow so long as someone rows me to the edge of antarctic water so i can throw it

, Blogger (schlump), Monday, 16 July 2012 16:08 (eleven years ago) link

Anyone know what Bulgaria is? A friend of mine is there and was close to being blown to shreds in a tour bus. Netanyahu blames Iran. Is this serious or just SOP for the area?

how's life, Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:22 (eleven years ago) link

Bulgaria is a country in central europe iirc

the alternate vision continues his vision quest! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:23 (eleven years ago) link

Yes, yes. It appears to be near Albania, ffs. It sounds so old-timey.

how's life, Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:26 (eleven years ago) link

it seems like a pretty random place to stage a terrorist attack, I'm not sure what to make of it. Netty blames Iran for everything fwiw.

the alternate vision continues his vision quest! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:28 (eleven years ago) link

This kind of thing is completely unheard of in Bulgaria, as far as i know. The Black Sea resorts are super-popular with Israeli tourists.

Temporarily Famous In The Czech Republic (ShariVari), Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:29 (eleven years ago) link

suspect sure doesn't look Iranian to me but what do I know

the alternate vision continues his vision quest! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 July 2012 15:44 (eleven years ago) link

six months pass...

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Monday he was ready to be the first human sent into orbit by Iran's fledgling space program, Iranian media reported.

The launch added to Western concerns about Iran's space program because the same rocket technology could potentially be used to deliver a nuclear warhead on a ballistic missile. "I am ready to be the first human to be sent to space by Iranian scientists," Ahmadinejad said on Monday, on the sidelines of an exhibition of space achievements in Tehran, according to the Mehr news agency. "Sending living things into space is the result of Iranian efforts and the dedication of thousands of Iranian scientists."

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 February 2013 17:09 (eleven years ago) link

I think we should encourage this.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 February 2013 17:09 (eleven years ago) link

rocket manejad

Spectrum, Monday, 4 February 2013 17:11 (eleven years ago) link

four years pass...
three months pass...

israel to iran, today

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz3Vfme-2qg

the late great, Monday, 30 April 2018 18:52 (five years ago) link

look at all that secret shit

https://i.imgur.com/nP4j1m8.jpg

the late great, Monday, 30 April 2018 19:00 (five years ago) link

bibi's presentation style is ... interesting

Daniel Johns Hopkins (jim in vancouver), Monday, 30 April 2018 19:27 (five years ago) link

red black and green binders a nice touch

the late great, Monday, 30 April 2018 19:35 (five years ago) link

actually should have been red white and green now that i think about it

my brain is off today

the late great, Monday, 30 April 2018 19:36 (five years ago) link

one year passes...

https://i.imgur.com/XkEeFfV.png

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 January 2020 11:50 (four years ago) link

thought this thread might be useful for non-UK politics takes on this, apologies if i've missed another revive

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 January 2020 11:54 (four years ago) link

Most talk has been over here.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 3 January 2020 12:04 (four years ago) link

ah thank you

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 January 2020 12:05 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.