The long overdue _Blade Runner_ thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1963 of them)
how it actually is = rather adolescent, like everything else attached to philip k dick

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:03 (eighteen years ago) link

sure, but thats 99.999999999999999999% of all science fiction!
anyway i am hardly the first person on this thread to frame their feelings re: bladerunner in terms of their adolescent feelings toward it!

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:04 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost i gotta disagree with that.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:05 (eighteen years ago) link

and i thought you were a fellow Lovecraft aficianado...like that ain't adolescent!
i'm cool with spielberg, just not his 1977 new age crapfest of a movie.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:06 (eighteen years ago) link

god i hate film threads. always people with different opinions showing up.
:-D
Vahid does not speak a language that I even remotely understand. Seriously, it's just a pile of crap.

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:07 (eighteen years ago) link

which pile of crap are you referring to?

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:09 (eighteen years ago) link

i like vahid just fine, i just can't agree with him at all on this one!
i feel like an infocom parser.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:10 (eighteen years ago) link

lovecraft is childish, you're right. my feelings toward blade runner are about the same as my feelings toward lovecraft. it's pretty, i appreciate it for the atmosphere, but it doesn't really live and breathe, there's not enough space in it, every single fucking thing is there to make a point and i get tired of that after a while.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:10 (eighteen years ago) link

that's sort of also my problem with "starship troopers", i guess.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:11 (eighteen years ago) link

i quite liked minority report.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:12 (eighteen years ago) link

there's not really a moment in blade runner that's like when the NASA dude runs to the bathroom when the UFOs are landing, he practically falls on his face because he can't look away but he's gotta take a shit. or all of the "dudes in a cabin" humor and tension from "the thing", or just the little snippets of sleazy city living from "videodrome" (1000x more dystopic and prescient than bladerunner) or all the random CGI asides from "tron". that's what blade runner's missing.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:13 (eighteen years ago) link

and i guess when i say "adolescent" i don't really mean childish, because i can't really shit on "childish wonder", there's nothing wrong with that. more like "teenage goth coffeshop pseudo-intellectual BIG IDEAS HERE PEOPLE" sort of adolescent thinking behind bladerunner.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:15 (eighteen years ago) link

my feelings toward blade runner are about the same as my feelings toward lovecraft. it's pretty, i appreciate it for the atmosphere, but it doesn't really live and breathe, there's not enough space in it, every single fucking thing is there to make a point and i get tired of that after a while.

I kind of agree and ALL OF SCIENCE FICTION MOVIEMAKING TO THREAD EXCEPT FOR BLADERUNNER BECAUSE IT'S REALLY GREAT AND BRILLIANT.

See, you're trying to apply the rule to the exception. No sir.

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:16 (eighteen years ago) link

"teenage goth coffeshop pseudo-intellectual BIG IDEAS HERE PEOPLE" sort of adolescent thinking behind bladerunner.

-- vahid (vfoz...)

haha i think you're talking about the Matrix, not Blade Runner.

"everything is there to make a point"

!?

i dont really think so, plotwise the film isn't as that concious of its intent, in fact it's rather all over the place (in that sense it is kind of shallow). reading the making of book shows you how much was come up with at the last minute or improvised by the actors. the main thing the movie is fully concious of is the look, the music, the atmosphere, the mise-en-scene. sure its pretentious, but it's beautiful.

IT'S TOO BAD SHE WON'T LIVE. BUT THEN AGAIN, WHO DOES?

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:19 (eighteen years ago) link

more like "teenage goth coffeshop pseudo-intellectual BIG IDEAS HERE PEOPLE" sort of adolescent thinking behind bladerunner.

I will not accept shitting on ideas just because they're ideas. It's just anti-intellectualism in its purest form. You can throw a lot of stupid stereotypical labels as anything, but that doesn't make it a valid or smart thing to do.

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:20 (eighteen years ago) link

x-post

yeah, exactly! its all kind of nonsensical but it sounds profound! in the best possible way.

yeah the soundtrack is obviously immortal and awesome. the look and atmosphere is good. i guess the big thing about my list upthread is that there's 21 movies (sorry gear, i draw the line at ST) where i actually gave a shit what happened to the characters. i had a lot of trouble feeling concerned for anybody in blade runner because, well, stuff gets in the way. here's where MY film buff language breaks down, i just never really understood where i'm supposed to go from thinking roy was creepy to sympathy for roy, except there was a beautifully shot scene of roy releasing birds into sunlight with nice vangelis music. and i still didn't give a shit about deckard and his girlfriend (except for wincing when he got beat up and thinking it would be creepy to find origami on the porch).

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:23 (eighteen years ago) link

hey, kenan, if you're not paying attention here, i'm actually giving reasons why i don't like the movie and examples of what i think are "spaces" in the other movies and why i have problems with the ideas in blade runner. i think they're shallow ideas, dude! shallower than forrest gump, even!

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:25 (eighteen years ago) link

and anyway forrest gump's message isn't particularly shallow, it's just wrapped in a saccharine coating that makes it hard to swallow.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:25 (eighteen years ago) link

hmmm ... i wonder if we had a t/s: ET vs bladerunner which would win??

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:27 (eighteen years ago) link

When did "caring" become the ultimate movie virtue? Yuck.

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:27 (eighteen years ago) link

you don't like "caring"? maybe that's why people think you're a creep?

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:29 (eighteen years ago) link

anyway, one more cheap crack before i go to bed: no electric sheep, no credibility.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:29 (eighteen years ago) link

xxxxxx-post

that actually is the weakest part of the film: the characters are mostly undersketched and the love story is somewhat forced and unconvincing. i think the replicants and the JR Sebastian character are the most 'human' and sympasthetic elements in the film. i think Roy is kinda supposed to be a creepy/ambiguous character while the other replicants are more childlike and innocent. (even Brion James as Leon is more like an angry toddler in a man's body than anything else)

and anyway forrest gump's message isn't particularly shallow, it's just wrapped in a saccharine coating that makes it hard to swallow.

No, it's all shallow, to the core. What... being dumb is good? Stumbling cluelessly through life is a great and noble thing to do? Explain to me how this message is not particularly shallow.

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:31 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost

see, kenan, even noted misanthrope philip k dick cared about caring. enough to work the theme into the title of the book!

idiot.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:31 (eighteen years ago) link

gump's message isn't shallow, it's just poisonously wrong. schmaltz by itself isn't a crime, it depends on what medicine you're cramming down people's throats with it.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:31 (eighteen years ago) link

"the personal is political".

idiot.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:31 (eighteen years ago) link

hmmm ... i wonder if we had a t/s: ET vs bladerunner which would win??

-- vahid (vfoz...), April 17th, 2006.

well, Blade Runner. but i love grand, impersonal sci-fi visions.

i like ET a lot though, it's the best kind of "saccharine", because it earns the tears and it comes from a genuine emotional place and understanding of being a kid.

you don't like "caring"? maybe that's why people think you're a creep?

People think I'm a creep because I'm socially inept, not because I'm stupid.

Gilbert O'Sullivan (kenan), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:33 (eighteen years ago) link

well, i try to avoid both.

yeah, latebloomer, see where i'm coming from, we get to see the man-child get shot but we don't get to see deckard crying over his dead electric sheep? weak priorities, dude.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:34 (eighteen years ago) link

eh, sorry i called you a creep. that was uncalled for. you're a champ.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:38 (eighteen years ago) link

i understand where you're coming from: the sheep ommission is kind of regrettable. but Blade Runner for me is seperate from the book. it's really a different entity and focuses on different aspects of the same subject matter. it turned into something else along the way.

lol at Gilbert O'Sullivan 3000000 times as ever

did spielberg have anything to do w/ gump?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 April 2006 07:40 (eighteen years ago) link

nothing, i believe, other then being a close associate of zemeckis.
"Sushi. That's what my ex-wife called me; cold fish"
"Ex-cop, ex-Blade Runner... ex-killer"

I really want to watch this now but I don't own it. Like a fool I'm forever waiting for the never-come 2/3 disc spesh edish. But even then I'd miss the voiceover.

"Gaff had been there and let her live. Fours years he figured; he was wrong. I don't know how long we'll have together - who does?"
*Music swells*

David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 17 April 2006 10:13 (eighteen years ago) link

Like a fool I'm forever waiting for the never-come 2/3 disc spesh edish.

I hear you there. (I do own the current DVD, at least.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 11:42 (eighteen years ago) link

i think that the (upcoming?) dvd should have a function where u can switch the ford commentary on or off at will. surely that's what dvd technology was made for?

u know we had to wait years in the uk for a proper cd release of the soundtrack. was it the same everywhere else too? over here there was only some silly ass orchstral version availabale instead, up until 1994 when the proper thing came out. easily my favourite soundtrack disc ever.

truly a crime that there isn't some triple dvd thing going on. a *crime*.

piscesboy (piscesboy), Monday, 17 April 2006 11:42 (eighteen years ago) link

i assume they will release it next year so they can do all sorts of fancy marketing around it being the "25th anniversary" and all...

Know what a turtle is Leon? Same Thing.

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:04 (eighteen years ago) link

This is easily still one of my favourite movies of all time. I do kind of understand vahid's criticisms, and I do accept I am still appreciating it through adolescent eyes, but at the end of the day, DAMN, it just looks SO good.

I think what I loved most was the "near-reality" of it. Sure, it was way in the future, there were flying cars, etc, but it somehow looked plausible and real - rain, crowded streets packed with advertising messages, etc. Which reminds me - why has no-one made umbrellas with the neon shaft? I'd totally use one of those. Sometimes I walk through Chinatown in Toronto and get a very BR vibe...

Biggest thing that used to baffle me was the replicant count conversation at the police station, the cop saying six "skin jobs" escaped, and then later there was a disrepancy between his and Deckard's 'count'... I'm having trouble remembering it all now (been a while), but I never really straightened that out in my head, since it didn't seem to add up (is that more "Deckard is a replicant" stuff?).

There are some pretty OTT cheesy lines in the script, mainly the police/crime story element - "You're not cop you're little people", etc. But there is just soooo much else to love about this film.

Live... in the offworld colonies!

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:16 (eighteen years ago) link

this is such a paltry film - it's barely science fiction - the effects are banal at best - and what it functions much better as is a critique of late C20science meets capitalism, via an incredible rip off of fritz lang's metroplois and a million and one bad, voice over narrated detective crime flicks, mixed with a smidgen of oh so scary eye spoodge make up and gymnastics (because androids dream of high bars). Ford calls in his performance after Star Wars and Apocalypse Now, marking the beginning of the line that stretches right up to Anne Heche's labia major, and the characters themselves are emptier than a lone star crate at Dubya's ranch.
what's good here is not much at all except atmospherics - everything else wasx done much better later on or before (concise I know, but I'm thinking aliens or even empire strikes back in terms of cities, mind you dark city took blade runner for a romp - I'm surprised ridly didn't sue for outright theft) but it's a movie for bad lonely autumn nights before you disocver decent movies, or at least ones that attempt instead of copulate themselves in self congratulatory psuedo intelligencia's leaking anal wounds.

Queen Gforvagina not for vangelis, Monday, 17 April 2006 12:20 (eighteen years ago) link

wow

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Monday, 17 April 2006 12:36 (eighteen years ago) link

Blade Runner really just introduces robots that can pass for human; the rest of the technology is window dressing. Kael's piece almost rings true when she tries to crack jokes about replicants -- Blade Runner is a movie about replicants, for replicants. That's why it works, because the "CAN YOU SEE?!?" moment is so subtle that many people missed it. Any character worth empathizing with in the film (Deckard, Rachel, Roy) is a replicant. Deckard's boss is off cracking jokes about taking out "skinjobs," Tyrell is cold and manipulative and ever-so self-congratulatory, and everyone else blends into the background.

vahid, I can see your point about the nerdy focus on certain elements in this film or Dick's relatively unrelated work, but I really don't think absence of empathy with women is evidence of misogyny.

mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:00 (eighteen years ago) link

u know we had to wait years in the uk for a proper cd release of the soundtrack. was it the same everywhere else too?

Yup.

Biggest thing that used to baffle me was the replicant count conversation at the police station, the cop saying six "skin jobs" escaped, and then later there was a disrepancy between his and Deckard's 'count'... I'm having trouble remembering it all now (been a while), but I never really straightened that out in my head, since it didn't seem to add up (is that more "Deckard is a replicant" stuff?).

You really need to read the Sammon book, m'friend. ;-) (In brief -- originally there were a total of sex replicants; the first to die, Mary, was to have died 'naturally' in the company of the rest as an introduction to the film. The second died in the attack on Tyrell Corporation, and the rest are in the film. They recorded a loop at the time to fix it, but the results didn't look good on-screen in terms of lip-movement and synchronization.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:12 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.