US POLITICS: AMERICANS, PLEASE WELCOME YOUR NEW PRESIDENT... SCOTT BROWN!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4572 of them)

so HCR will lead to america's being marginalized on the world stage, and eventually invaded and occupied by foreign enemies?

i'm now against HCR.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link

it's not worth that terrible, terrible price.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link

How dare you question Red Dawn.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:11 (fourteen years ago) link

i remember having to hide under desks to prepare for a possible Soviet nuclear attack.

it's sad what this HCR bill will do to our country.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:12 (fourteen years ago) link

I was going to post the Steyn post a half hour ago; it's amazing. Its subtext: "We can no longer afford to rape and pillage other countries because our health care system may be as excellent as Western Europe's."

The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:13 (fourteen years ago) link

david gergen on my tv right now calling pelosi one of the most powerful and effective speakers in history

Well, like I said upthread, I'm not one to give Dems credit, but she's the most effective Speaker of my lifetime, certainly.

The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, i don't think gergen's necessarily off-base.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link

She definitely shines a light on the absolute uselessness of Harry Reid in the upper house, anyway.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:16 (fourteen years ago) link

btw, not only is this not a "failed presidency," i'd say it's one of the more effective first-years i've seen in a presidential term in my lifetime.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:16 (fourteen years ago) link

in terms of moving key legislative initiatives through congress (i'm not arguing merits, here).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:16 (fourteen years ago) link

To give Harry Reid the barest scintilla of credit, he'll likely be defeated for passing this.

The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:17 (fourteen years ago) link

i think pelosi knows her shit. i'm just always amused by how quickly the pundit wisdom changes depending on what's happening on any given day.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:19 (fourteen years ago) link

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWI3MGNjMjVlMmJmYjEwNzdlYTYzZWYwNDlmNWIxNzg=

Longer wait times, fewer doctors, more bureaucracy, massive IRS expansion, explosive debt, the end of the Pax Americana, and global Armageddon. Must try to look on the bright side...

haha lol ok, ty for that

ice cr?m, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Steny Hoyer looks like the kitten with the canary in his mouth.

The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:21 (fourteen years ago) link

republican butthurtedness is enabling me to overlook democratic smug-assholeness.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:23 (fourteen years ago) link

my brother-in-law, a very smart guy and works as a runner for a rent-a-car agency, insists that this HCR bill will drive up everyone's health-care premiums.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:26 (fourteen years ago) link

i would assume that many people in his position would welcome HCR. i wonder how many others like him are now likely to vote republican (he started out as a big obama supporter; not sure what happened).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:27 (fourteen years ago) link

a very smart guy and works as a runner for a rent-a-car agency, insists that this HCR bill will drive up everyone's health-care premiums.

hmmm. maybe he's not a very smart guy?

Mr. Que, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:29 (fourteen years ago) link

About to say, you're not doing wonders here convincing me of his brilliance.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link

haha. he is book-smart (valedictorian of his HS graduating class, iirc). but i've never had a good handle on his politics.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:33 (fourteen years ago) link

he sounds like a dumbass

Mr. Que, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:33 (fourteen years ago) link

send him this link and tell him to look at #2

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/12/five_cost_controls_in_the_sena.html

Mr. Que, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:34 (fourteen years ago) link

lol! okay, easy now.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:34 (fourteen years ago) link

i will send him the link. thanks, que.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:34 (fourteen years ago) link

So we may end up lowering the ridiculous amount we use on defense for a national system that helps people at home rather than killing people abroad? What the fuck are we waiting for IMHO.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:36 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm beginning to think someone could make a financial killing taking advantage of people like Daniel's brother-in-law by setting up some insurance company and going "Here's how to get health care coverage without being part of Obamacare!" without actually saying you're just doing what the law now requires you to do now anyway.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:38 (fourteen years ago) link

"I've got my health care coverage now from Crying Eagle Insurance and I'm keeping America strong!"

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:38 (fourteen years ago) link

"And get this -- join now and we'll cover your kids until they're 25!"

"Holy fuck, I'm in! Why didn't they tell me!"

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:39 (fourteen years ago) link

so like 500 tea party people there, i'd say? not that many. and some gop reps are standing on a terrace on one of the higher floors of the capitol waving like the queen of england

If I were in the immigration reform crowd today I'd be pretty cheesed at the accidental timing. "Dude, we're all over here!"

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:44 (fourteen years ago) link

if i were in the immigration reform crowd today, i'd be hiding from bats--t crazy "tea-baggers."

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:46 (fourteen years ago) link

if i were the immigration reform crowd id be all ay this is nice and all but what abt immigration reform

ice cr?m, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:49 (fourteen years ago) link

the immigration reform crowd was tens of thousands, easily. massive.

xxpost -- There's at least a hundred thousand people in the immigration reform crowd so personally I'd think otherwise.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Anyway now the procedural vote is done so the final debate can begin! *snores*

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Really looking forward to the final debate!!

ksh, Sunday, 21 March 2010 22:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Anyway now the procedural vote is done so the final debate can begin! *snores*

THE FINAL CONFRONTATION. MANO-A-MANO.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:02 (fourteen years ago) link

Just got done reading Michael Shermer's _Why People Believe Weird Things_, and he repeatedly makes the point on the book and on his blog that intelligence doesn't really affect whether you believe weird things or not. Smart people are excellent at rationalizing beliefs they've arrived at thru non-smart means.

Another example are the kind of brilliant technical people one meets who are really into Ayn Rand, Ron Paul, trutherism, UFOs, etc.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:03 (fourteen years ago) link

does someone have a quick, quality link rebutting the argument that HCR will raid millions from medicare/older americans?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:05 (fourteen years ago) link

"Smart people are excellent at rationalizing beliefs they've arrived at thru non-smart means."

^ Just made this my facebook status.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Seriously. Check out Shermer's SkepticBlog. Writes about this alla time.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:08 (fourteen years ago) link

xxp http://www.slate.com/id/2237497/

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:08 (fourteen years ago) link

does someone have a quick, quality link rebutting the argument that HCR will raid millions from medicare/older americans?

― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, March 21, 2010 6:05 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

daniel i dunno, but there were some "expected" savings in Medicare that were counted in the overall cost computation of the bill, i think. and then the bill of course spends money on subsidies for the uninsured, so, there you go. maybe that's what "raiding" means?

there is some controversy among Corner types re: "double counting" some medicare savings, but i dunno wtf they're on about

xps: or read that article i guess

goole, Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:10 (fourteen years ago) link

Grandstand, Oppose, Postpone = GOP. Don't know which Rep said this, but LOLLLLL.

ned ragú (suzy), Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:15 (fourteen years ago) link

so medicare advantage is a program whereby the gov't pays private insurers to administer medicare benefits, on the theory that they'll do it more efficiently (thereby yielding a savings for the gov't or better benefits for medicare advantage beneficiaries). but the idea backfired, and now medicare advantage is sucking more funds from the gov't than regular medicare payments, and that's the medicare money that the HCR recoups (by pairing back the medicare advantage program)?

sorry to ask dumb questions on the eve of a historic vote.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:21 (fourteen years ago) link

LOL at this republican complaining about Obama using an executive order

the rolling bears (Z S), Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:23 (fourteen years ago) link

We all remember his valiant efforts to limit Bush's use of the exec. order.

the rolling bears (Z S), Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:23 (fourteen years ago) link

yglesias on the final stupak bullshit:

I’ve spent a while trying to figure out what it is Bart Stupak got in the course of his executive order “compromise” on abortion, and as best I can tell the answer is nothing. Or as Athenae < href="http://www.first-draft.com/2010/03/bart-got-what-he-wanted.html";>puts it he got attention. I think what primarily happened is that with his bloc dissolving, Stupak cut a face-saving deal that mostly gave him an opportunity for “walking back from some of his past arguments”.

The problem with Stupack’s position in this has been that current law already reflects what he wants and the proposal he was objecting to also already reflects what he wants. If I wrote the laws, abortion would be treated like the bona fide medical procedure it is, and there’d be no reason that government-subsidized insurance plans couldn’t offer it. But I don’t write the laws, existing law reflects unjust discrimination against abortion services, and Obama’s proposals have always included a commitment to maintain the status quo. The political judgment that revisiting the Hyde Amendment in the middle of a giant fight about the overall structure of the insurance market was a bad idea strikes me as correct. But as a result of that, Stupak has been spending all this time huffing and puffing over basically nothing. In the end, Obama agreed to issue an executive order that basically amounts to pinky swearing that the Hyde rules are still in effect, but that’s always been his position. In exchange, Stupak agreed to acknowledge that the proposal actually does what everyone’s been saying it does, but he gets to walk away without admitting that he’s been wrong about this for a while now.

goole, Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh here they go with Pitts, bitching about the executive order and trying to control my uterus, with magic Christians.

ned ragú (suzy), Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

can we get a new USGVT thred?

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Sunday, 21 March 2010 23:48 (fourteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.