Lifter Puller, Rock and Roll!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (263 of them)
(but I bet it's not the first time you noticed that I can't tell one, either!)

yes, Kate, we knew

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 29 June 2003 03:23 (twenty years ago) link

(god I can't believe I just expended all that energy on this. apologies to everyone)

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 29 June 2003 03:42 (twenty years ago) link

it's ok - it's good to see ya riled up! matos as jonah jameson!

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 29 June 2003 05:42 (twenty years ago) link

kate -- the lyrics were smart FEELING, but I never found the time to devote the fanboy careful attention they were sculpted to demand. but if they weren't sculpted for that they'd probably have FELT less smart and stuttery and interesting.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 29 June 2003 06:01 (twenty years ago) link

Wow, I go away for two days and look what I missed! In relation to my newfound lp love: it took me awhile, and it also took one song that stuck, like seward's experience, made me listen and after that the other songs grabbed me by the neck. And Josh, I think the lp thing is difficult to describe because it's so good. I recognize here I'm doing more of the not-describing. As far as the lyrical topic goes, I think I'd enjoy Craig Finn's lyrics and vocals if he were singing about mowing the lawn or something if the lyrics were this creative, memorable, multi-hued and -layered.

scott m (mcd), Monday, 30 June 2003 01:09 (twenty years ago) link

I'm going to keep basically mum about this from here on out but I just have to say that a lot of my non-sequitur throwing-around had to do w/my frustration due to (a) a lot of Josh's questions having already been dealt with upthread before he even got involved and (b) the fact that anyone who could have taken my Magnetic Fields crack as anything but the joke it was intended is in serious need of lightening the fuck up. (including me for not just telling him it was one and letting it escalate, I suppose, but JEEE-ZUS. did I need to decorate it the typographical equiv. of Groucho glasses to make it plainer?)

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 30 June 2003 01:32 (twenty years ago) link

my questions were not dealt with earlier in the thread. I gave you crap not so much because I was offended, though I was, but because I didn't think you deserved to get away with brushing me off. that's just lazy thinking, not "argumentative". if you'll notice, you initially said it was total bullshit to say that LP romanticize anything, and that I totally didn't understand the band. yet later you ended up saying yes, LP do romanticize nightlife and clublife. what changed? would we have gotten that far if I had not reacted to your attempts to end discussion prematutely?

Josh (Josh), Monday, 30 June 2003 02:38 (twenty years ago) link

um, but where did you get? it's like saying 'we wouldn't have gotten lost here if I hadn't told you to keep driving

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 30 June 2003 02:43 (twenty years ago) link

I said it was total bullshit to say that ALL THEY DID was romanticize something. you came on and were like, well, they remind me of all that Please Kill Me-type behavior I find abhorrent, where's the art in that? and I said there were a lot more dimensions in it than you're giving it credit for. that, to me, on your part, was lazy thinking, which is why I got so fucking annoyed. as far as "getting further," most of what I said to you about the style of storytelling, recurring characters, etc., was reiterations of stuff I'd written upthread before you jumped in. so "we" didn't get "that far" at all.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 30 June 2003 02:55 (twenty years ago) link

also, by putting people immediately on the defensive ("people buy into this mythical bullshit wholesale" is a pretty offensive statement insofar as it presumes the stuff involve being untrue, the people who like it being undiscerning, and by proxy everybody involved except the accuser being stupid) isn't the best way to make sure the level of debate stays at an even keel. whether that was your intention or not, that was the effect.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 30 June 2003 03:07 (twenty years ago) link

also 'here's a gross overgeneralization provided with no argument or context whatsoever now prove it wrong' isn't that interesting a debate method

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 30 June 2003 04:18 (twenty years ago) link

it apparently is, if it can take matos from totally denying it to admitting it. and I don't think it's true that he said my first post was total bullshit because that's not ALL LP do. he didn't say - he was just dismissive. but he's gone on to concede something like what I said at first, with an important caveat: that yes sure LP romanticize the nightlife (including the not so positive aspects), but they do it IN A REALLY INTERESTING WAY.

matos keeps posting as if he's answered me somehow, but I'm not happy. reason: I don't CARE about the 'interesting way' stuff, the mechanics of songwriting. there are lots of good songwriters out there. my original question and later questions had the thrust of: why this subject matter? why the extremely intense identification with, or affinity for, this subject matter? this is what I think I've gotten out of matos, so far:

1) rebellion is attractive
2) personal experience of the lifestyle
3) LP get to something pretty deep in the heart of why people go clubbing et al; there is a romantic aspect to nightlife and there are, believe it or not, intelligent people who are drawn to that
4) CF found this world/life interesting and wanted to explore it

what do LP get to about why people choose the nightlife (and I assume we mean here not just to go out and have a little fun kind of nightlife, but a lifestyle where this IS life)? the reason I put it in terms of a 'myth' before was that that thing, at the heart of why people live this life, seems like one sort of story told about, if you will, the essence of 'rock'. about what really makes it important, or authentic, or significant, or good.

Josh (Josh), Monday, 30 June 2003 05:07 (twenty years ago) link

did he steal your girlfriend in summer camp or something? cuz 'I'll get you matos, just you wait' isn't that interesting for outside parties (maybe not even interesting for matos. clearly interesting for you though.)

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 30 June 2003 05:15 (twenty years ago) link

I'm sorry you're not happy, but I'm finished jumping through the same hoops over and over for you. Good night.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 30 June 2003 05:16 (twenty years ago) link

responding to your argument /= confirming your argument

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 30 June 2003 05:17 (twenty years ago) link

Josh, do you ever get tired of chasing your tail? Don't you ever get dizzy? Shouldn't you being working on your dissertationso the Librarian can toss it into the basement with the rest? JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP, PLEASE!

general zod, Monday, 30 June 2003 05:41 (twenty years ago) link

general zod tells you to shut up = you must be doing something right.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 30 June 2003 07:00 (twenty years ago) link

"JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP, PLEASE!" = a fucking contemptible piece of anonymous cowardly shithead thread-fascism

(the fact that zod is possibly a poster i like when s/he's NOT being anonymous doesn't alter this judgment in the slightest)

this is an interesting thread even if the main discussors were annoyed and unhappy during it: in fact, possibly BECAUSE the main discussors — both highly intelligent writers — were annoyed and unhappy about it (two very raw spots rubbing against one another: why?)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 30 June 2003 09:49 (twenty years ago) link

it is interesting and its a pity the args might end here.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 30 June 2003 10:21 (twenty years ago) link

OK, sorry I was jetlagged and missed this. I have great news for the world. Lifter Puller is about language. Period. The subject matter that Finn uses is barely matters, though the use of recurring characters does as that, too, is about language. The notion that there are good or bad subjects for writing about is too ridiculous to address though Josh has asserted that that's not what he's saying at all: though in that case it's hard to imagine he's listened hard enough, as Finn approaches his subject from so many different angles and through so many different narrative lenses that ascribing a single opinion to Finn w/r/t his themes/characters is rough work at best. The reason this whole thing chafes people, as noted upthread, is that those of us who are convinced that Craig Finn is the best lyricist to come along in twenty or so years, maybe more, are as evangelical as you'd expect people who were convinced of such a proposition to be. We say things like "if you don't hear what's good about Craig Finn's writing, then either you haven't listened hard enough or you don't know a whole lot about writing." That's what this thread is about, eventually.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 30 June 2003 11:53 (twenty years ago) link

the subject matter does matter, j0hn! Do you think CF could have done what he did using, i dunno, wall street as the location? (ha probably MORE drugs there but fewer eyepatch guys I guess.) (there has to be some famous corporate raider tho who had an eyepatch, am I misremembering someone?)

Maybe Josh's problem is that it's a little obvious? I was going to post a lecturing post abt how EVERY band lives in this world and is comprised of these kinds of people, that would have gone something like this: Waiting tables, tending bar, doing a little freelance, going to parties, living at NIGHT, making your money in tips, getting a tattoo, driving a shitty car, being in a couple bands or art projects that will go nowhere, doing drugs and knowing people who do WAY more than you, wasting your money, watching people you went to school with (whatever level you managed to finish) commuting in their new Jetta, trying to make your ideas matter in the world, to make them pay off, to make the utter childish mess of your life pay off --> this is the place that all pop music comes from, unless you're Kelly Clarkson. So it's not like LP are somehow special or wierd for having anything TO DO with the life; you could even fault every other performer for saying LESS abt it. Yeah LP do a 'pastoral' or 'grotesque' way of looking at it, but it's the place that all of your other music comes from.

...But that isn't news to anyone I guess. So maybe that's Josh's problem with them? Every band ever is in this world and all the other ones want to talk abt something ELSE? CF's great use of metonymy notwithstanding? I mean, "woke up with my hand stuck in the tapedeck" is probably one of my favorite lines from any song: hilarious, unexpected, clear, detailed. To bring up another of my old poetry profs: "there is no such thing as a synonym" (she was qting someone else who I should know the name of) TAPEDECK, it's so perfect, so much better than 'stereo' (or, since the line dodges away at the last second from snicker-snicker sex talk, 'up her ass' or something). What kind of manky shithole was he partying in? The part stands in for the whole. But if you (the general 'you' here really) just think that waking up with your hand stuck in a tapedeck at 23 or 27 or 35 is ONLY a stupid thing to do, I guess yeah the uh charms of LP may mean jack to you.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Monday, 30 June 2003 12:59 (twenty years ago) link

the subject matter does matter, j0hn! Do you think CF could have done what he did using, i dunno, wall street as the location?

Yeah, I do think so, actually! While I respond partly because I recognize a lot of CF's characters, it's pretty much an article of faith for me that subject matter is cosmetic: the substance lies elsewhere.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 30 June 2003 13:13 (twenty years ago) link

so do I, but why didn't he, then? if the location of meaning isn't in what the songs are about but in HOW they are about that thing (what I guess you mean by 'elsewhere')... I don't know how to finish that thought. But it's kind of like that line abt Elvis' (or anyone's) great voice 'oh he could have just sung the phone book' to which the honest reply is 'haha yeah RIGHT.'

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Monday, 30 June 2003 13:28 (twenty years ago) link

I think it's about the insight into the lives of these characters like watching a movie. The lyrics are so vivid and the characterizations pretty complete. I hardly ever have to relate to the lives of people in a movie beyond grandiose themes like love, the pursuit of happiness, sex, death, natural disaster, coming of age, etc. I can still be moved by it because of the way it's developed into a riveting story. And I think CF coulda done a record on Wall St. (the darker side, at least) that would be just as exciting if it was written with the same detail and wit. Waking up with a hand in a tapedeck IS a stupid thing to do, it's absurd and incredibly sad (and moreso due to that word 'tapedeck' for sure) Another instance from Nassau Coliseum:

the girl selling t-shirts was kind of a freaker,
first she gets handcuffed
they started to beat her, i was so angry, you had just left me
they had her pinned down, it was so easy, gotta admit it
i can't forget it, i don't regret it
that i got some kicks in

Can't get beyond the selfishness, and it's just so plainly sad and even universal. The heft of the cruel world is underwhelming and unmoving next to selfish thoughts and personal pain.

scott m (mcd), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:48 (twenty years ago) link

Christ that song is just so disturbing

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:56 (twenty years ago) link

I have great news for the world. Lifter Puller is about language.

About language? I dunno. Certainly they use language in a fascinating, complicated, almost singular way, but I wouldn't say they're about it. At least not in the formalist/gestural way the word "about" implies to me.

I think there's really dense, rich thematic stuff going on in LP's ouvre -- stuff about the way subcultures work, about a certain kind of millenial American sadness... Anyone wanna start a thread on thematic strands that run through Craig Finn's work?

Ess, Monday, 30 June 2003 15:58 (twenty years ago) link

OK, so Slug is credited with vocals on "Math is Murder," but can anyone hear him on that track? Is he just in the background or something? He certainly doesn't rap or contribute lyrics or anything. But how great would a full-on Lifter Puller/Atmosphere collabo be? I say that because both Finn and Slug both have such great eyes for detail and narrative (Atmosphere's "Hair" from God Loves Ugly is case in point), and also because both are so rhytmically inventive and immediate. Either one, at their best ("Secret Santa Cruz" for Lifter Puller and "The Bass and the Movement" for Atmosphere [as far as I'm concerned]) would not sound out of place at all on a dancefloor. And then there's the regional thing, but I don't care about that when it isn't Baltimore. Lots of people have referred to the hip-hop element of what Finn does/how he uses his voice, but I think it's a shame that he hasn't really pulled the trigger on that and gone further with it.

Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Monday, 30 June 2003 17:53 (twenty years ago) link

Fucking great Hold Steady lyric:

"He said, 'My name is Corey - I'm really into hardcore - People call me HARD .... COREY!"

I had to go sit down after hearing that because I was laughing so hard.

Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Monday, 30 June 2003 17:56 (twenty years ago) link

two weeks pass...
lifter puller are the best band i've never heard the mountain goats who i love love them i choose to never hear them so that i never knew what i missed after all these years

nick georgiou, Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:32 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, you pretty much fucked up.

scott m (mcd), Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:39 (twenty years ago) link

one month passes...
Just wanted to add, in case one is unaware

http://www.thebrokerdealer.net/

is the still functional website for Craig Finn electronica side-project mentioned above. The site has 4 mp3s available... are they others out there??

There is some other band called broker/dealer out there too now.

if anyone is willing to share a copy of a LP live show, please let me know.. thanks.

Matt Sab, Tuesday, 26 August 2003 13:21 (twenty years ago) link

Did anyone go to that Hold Steady show at Southpaw on Fri? Review??? I can't believe I missed it, what a line up.

scott m (mcd), Tuesday, 26 August 2003 15:59 (twenty years ago) link

I listened to that Fiestas Fiascos thing twice and still couldn't see what all the fuss was about ... it was OK, but ...

brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Wednesday, 27 August 2003 03:13 (twenty years ago) link

she lifts those lips like a leech up to the Sex On the Beach

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 27 August 2003 03:17 (twenty years ago) link

listen to it 100 times, duh!!

Sonny A. (Keiko), Wednesday, 27 August 2003 03:18 (twenty years ago) link

one year passes...
I like these guys now.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:29 (eighteen years ago) link

i told you so. didn't i tell you? huh, didn't i? it was only a matter of time...

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:47 (eighteen years ago) link

I like Hold Steady, but I still think Half Dead and Dynamite is the best record Finn ever made.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:48 (eighteen years ago) link

I only kept half of Separation Sunday though. HALF, dammit. And I think I like Lifter Puller more than Hold Steady, though I've just been listening to Soft-Rock and Almost Killed Me with a bunch of other albums on windows media player shuffle recently when I decided that yes, Craig Finn, is a good thing. I haven't heard Fiestas + Fiascos yet, it might SUCK.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:50 (eighteen years ago) link

Nasseau Collesium is an epic jam for the ages!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Track 15 on disc 1 of Soft-Rock sounds like a GVSB parody, and that's what inspired me to revive this thread.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:51 (eighteen years ago) link

i like the soft rock stuff better than fiestas. but fiestas is choice. i too like lifter puller more than hold steady, but i like hold steady fine. i think i might even like the first hold steady more than the new one. i think i'm in the minority there. and most people like fiestas best, so i'm probably in the minority there too. that first disc of the soft rock thing is just one amazing blast after another. i never get sick of it.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:55 (eighteen years ago) link

what song? it messes me up cuz everyone has the Soft Rock and I have everything seperately....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:56 (eighteen years ago) link

I think I might like Almost Killed Me more than Separation Sunday too.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:57 (eighteen years ago) link

The GVSB parody is called (checking allmusic...) "The Gin And The Sour Defeat."

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link

Get Fiestas, Miccio!

C0L1N B... (C0L1N B...), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 23:14 (eighteen years ago) link

yes, get Fiestas

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 23:22 (eighteen years ago) link

haha I remember my argument w/Josh on here as being far less civilized than it actually was. points to us, I guess.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 23:29 (eighteen years ago) link

holy shit I just flipped through the thread and I'm listening to that band The Holy Ghost that Chuck refers to right now! I also burnt that from the station along with the Finnstuff and was thinking about the similarity. The HG are a too ballady but the connection is just.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 23:32 (eighteen years ago) link

Also, Lifter Puller was a great great great live band. and get Fiestas.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 23:32 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.