really?

really?

:)

not REALLY, but really.

If Kate wants a thread about fucking not to be derailed into a thread about sex-determination, that's cool.

maybe she shouldn't have dropped this bomb on the thread then:

"Remember that Freud had it the wrong way around. The default gender, biologically, is actually female. Males are the weird mutant freaks, chromosomally speaking, with their broken Y chromosome. Foetuses are female until hormones trigger them to mutate and become male. (This also explains why men have nipples.) If anything, a penis is an overgrown malformed clitoris."

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so. Retaining the mail has not even the dubious purpose of reproduction. The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, it has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.

haha "retaining the mail"

males are emotional nipples

TS: the idea that one sex in a sexually reproductive biological system is an "accident" vs. the idea that a chromosome with a greater number of genomes is intrinsically superior to a chromosome with fewer genomes

scum was the first thing i thought of after reading kate's post

walking abortions classic or dud

me too xpost

xpost yeah i knew that's where it came from

really?

See, this is the kind of poo that should be being flung on the thread itself.

Even thought it was supposed to be a thread specifically not about poo. There's no winning.

walking abortions classic or dud

lol harbl, too close to home

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so.

really?

it seems so wrong.

who would open jars?

actual lol. was about to post that very question.

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females.

But then we'll be like apple trees. This won't end well.

See, this is the kind of poo that should be being flung on the thread itself.

― kenan, Sunday, April 4, 2010 4:49 PM (5 minutes ago)

Will lock now, if the venting has given way to actual discussion of sex determination.

Carry on.