really?

TS: the idea that one sex in a sexually reproductive biological system is an "accident" vs. the idea that a chromosome with a greater number of genomes is intrinsically superior to a chromosome with fewer genomes

scum was the first thing i thought of after reading kate's post

walking abortions classic or dud

me too xpost

xpost yeah i knew that's where it came from

really?

See, this is the kind of poo that should be being flung on the thread itself.

Even thought it was supposed to be a thread specifically not about poo. There's no winning.

walking abortions classic or dud

lol harbl, too close to home

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so.

really?

it seems so wrong.

who would open jars?

actual lol. was about to post that very question.

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females.

But then we'll be like apple trees. This won't end well.

See, this is the kind of poo that should be being flung on the thread itself.

― kenan, Sunday, April 4, 2010 4:49 PM (5 minutes ago)

Will lock now, if the venting has given way to actual discussion of sex determination.

Carry on.