At What Point In Your Life Did Your Personality Get "Set" (If Indeed, It Ever Did)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (226 of them)
Like, do you love YOUR mother the way you love your kids? It changes into duty, concern, a type of friendship with strings, etc. But believe me, she's still NUTS about you!

It's good you feel that way about your kids Beth. B/c I'm not sure all parents do.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Sometimes the hungry love comes back around post-teenage-hood, though! My mother...I would like to eat her up and keep her forever, make us one, never lose the part of me that is her and vice versa.

Yes, pretty OTM once you get past the traumas of adolescence and the necessary separation.

Sometimes I can't stand my mother, sometimes she drives me insane, but I still love her so much I just can't contemplate ever being without me. So much it scares me sometimes. And that's when I get cranky and distancing, maybe. Because I'm scared of losing that love.

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post Don't forget a nice, nourishing meal, you basket-cases! It will give you a sense of well-being. There. ILXors won't be smothered by my nurture.

I think most parents love their kids massively, even if they're incompetent at putting it into practice. The desire for touch is a very animal thing, the licking of the cubs, regurgitating of food into their mouths, etc.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

that's like the saddest thing I've read today, Beth. Also: why I'm afraid of having kids! As a teacher I often feel a fainter shade of what you're referring to. Watching the kids get picked up at the end of the day, to go home to be loved. And return the love. But at the same time, I'd be ineffective teacher if I felt that too frequently. It's just the sad lot of the caretaker to suffer the whimsy and folly of her/his charges. I imagine this is how great deities must feel.

And Laurel's right: I adore both of my parents. Complicated, sure, but without reserve.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Sorry, distracted by a phone call:

I don't gush about them much

Oh don't worry, please, I wasn't complaining at all! I have so many friends with kids and I love them all -- it's great to be an unofficial uncle to so many around here in particular. But as was noted, it takes a certain kind of person to be a parent -- I don't think I am, though I've been told otherwise. In sum: Dr. C, feel free to talk about yer kids whenever. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Smothering! Oy, my favorite topic. Apparently I am under the impression that everyone I love needs another mother. Anyway, carry on.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Sometimes I get scared when I contemplate having kids (even though I know it's never going to happen now) - that I could never cope loving someone that much, being that attached to someone.

But I also know, from my too brief experience of being pregnant, that it's not really something you get a choice in, that it's very powerful and primal and hormonal. You can express that love badly, you can mingle it with resentment and other emotions, but it's something that happens on a neurotransmitter level, not a logical level.

Oh, this is making me very sad now. :-(

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I think most parents love their kids massively, even if they're incompetent at putting it into practice. The desire for touch is a very animal thing, the licking of the cubs, regurgitating of food into their mouths, etc.

I wonder about this often in the case of abusive/neglectufl parents. You can chalk their actions up to their own emotional/mental issues but when that treatment of their children never changes. . .when they never acknowledge it, fix it, own up to it?

I can't say I have any massive love for my parents. My mother, yes some, but largely out of obligation. I'm not sure what I'll feel when she dies, probably some guilt, not sure. Overall I've made peace with keeping her at arm's length and disenganging her from my emotions and life as much as possible. She seems to have no problem with this and has never had much to do with my life anyway. I wish my father was already dead.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link

The desire for touch is a very animal thing, the licking of the cubs, regurgitating of food into their mouths, etc.

I now look back on childhood memories of dinner through a much different viewpoint.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Your mother was an owl, Ned.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:48 (seventeen years ago) link

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/wes5020/orly_owl.jpg

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

Ah right, this was dad, now that I remember:

http://www.awn.com/mag/issue1.3/images/Beck7.gif

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link

I wonder about this often in the case of abusive/neglectufl parents. You can chalk their actions up to their own emotional/mental issues but when that treatment of their children never changes. . .when they never acknowledge it, fix it, own up to it?

So many people are damaged by addictions and undiagnosed mental illness. I'm sure they all have painful moments of lucidity about their parental failings. I don't think my father did, but, oh well.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Some people shouldn't have kids, but the people on this thread who are so terrified of having them are precisely the people who SHOULD have them.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:06 (seventeen years ago) link

my mother might, but she never shares them or tries to make up for the past. Also the selfish, hateful traits that led to her problems are still around. Core personality?

my point was simply I don't think everyone has that essential parental chip that you and Dr. C were describing. Reproductive organs aside, not just anyone can be a parent.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:06 (seventeen years ago) link

I know lots of loving people who had horrid, horrid parents. The genetic reshuffling is a great thing!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:11 (seventeen years ago) link

My brother, fellow POW, is a fantastically loving parent. He, along with my mother's wonderfully loving mother (RIP), have both given me the courage to want to be a mother. There might be genetic tendencies for horrible behavior but I do believe they are only tendencies.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago) link

I love my mother too much. I don't say this ironically, only truthfully. To some degree it's suffocating. I can see her flaws but refuse (mostly) to acknoiwledge them.

My father was horribly abused as a kid and is GREAT with kids. Ophelia just loves him so much.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:15 (seventeen years ago) link

but the people on this thread who are so terrified of having them are precisely the people who SHOULD have them

Whoa, I wouldn't go that far!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Ned, do your duty to the race, dammit.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:20 (seventeen years ago) link

you could make a donation Ned. I'm sure some parents to be would covet your hair.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe he's recognising that his bizarre lack of sideburns is a genetic defect and admitting that he should not pass that on to future humans!

;-)

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:22 (seventeen years ago) link

Some people shouldn't have kids, but the people on this thread who are so terrified of having them are precisely the people who SHOULD have them.

Uh... no.

So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:23 (seventeen years ago) link

How about you, Kenan? Not on the kids thing, but on when you feel your personality was mostly defined? (Also, the personality vs. behavioural change issue.)

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe he's recognising that his bizarre lack of sideburns is a genetic defect and admitting that he should not pass that on to future humans!

Millions of years of further evolution will prove that I was in the right.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:26 (seventeen years ago) link

A friend told me recently I've become much more agreeably social cuz I'm "resigned to my fate" of being single.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Did you have weird sexual-predator behavior before? Like exposing yourself to unattached prospects? That can fuck up a dinner party.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:44 (seventeen years ago) link

i doubt that anyone who knew me at any point from probably age 8 onward would be surprised at my personality now.

they might be surprised that i'm married, though. and rather more so if we spawn.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Till death do we part indeed. (Maybe not the best thread for this but it came to mind.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Would you say their personalities got "set"?

g00blar (gooblar), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe they were buried alive as punishment for their forbidden love.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe they were gay.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:17 (seventeen years ago) link

maybe they were really choking each other.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Some thoughts

Kate: But one thing I've noticed from this thread is that things go more easily if you don't just react about something someone has said that you disagree with (and it's taken a few instances of self discipline to refrain from zings) but rather to ask questions and get the person to clarify and rephrase until you understand what they are saying, not just what you expect/think they are saying, due to your impression of what their personality is or isn't.

Says Ms "lalala, I'm not listening" - you'll notice from recent interaction on "your" thread that I have not resorting to zinging or cheap points-scoring, rather I have set out in detail some issues which may impinge on the way others see you, but all you've done is go "oh, fuck off already, I can't be arsed with this". But, hey, perhaps if I do it again you'll be more receptive to my points.

(also see your reaction to certain people on the vegetarianism thread (and other thread passim) based on other issues with them elsewhere...I hope your personality isn't so set in stone that you can't stop doing this all over the place)

no, it actually can change it, i've done it. there was stuff i was *really* bitter about in my early 20s (ok perhaps i don't count and am still in flux and am a mere babe at 28) and it made me miserable to myself and horrible to certain other people. it wasn't just huge things either, but small things would *really* get to me and i was angry and hateful. i decided i did not want to be like that, to myself or to anyone else, and after a lot of internal wrangling i have taught myself to be able to let go, to not be someone who carries badnesses with them like that. and sure, for ages it was literally gritting my teeth and telling myself "it.does.NOT.MATTER.let.it.GO." and reacting "gggrrrnnnghhhbut-but-but-waaaaargh" and so on and so on. but now it's different; i have actually changed.

Emsk - you are me and I claim my five pounds. Except I didn't really get the hang of this until a couple of years ago, and I'm six years older than you. So you aren't me, you're a younger yet wiser me, and you can keep your five pounds.

FWIW, I think I spent too long trying to be something I'm not. I'm happier now than I ever was.

And further, since so much upthread is based upon the involvement of a significant other, this internal change came about several years after I met my husband, and after we got married. And it had nothing, really, to do with him. He married me the way I used to be. I'm still the same, just a bit happier with it. And I'm reaping the rewards - I am more settled in myself, happier with my own company and with that of the friends I have and the company I keep (something I used to prioritise above all others when I was completely incapable of maintaining friendships with anyone, without realising I was going totally the wrong way about it).

I don't think my personality is set in stone yet, but I'm getting happier with it than I was.

(I have no idea what the catalyst for the start of this change was, btw)

Oh, sorry, you've all moved on and are now making jokes about skeletons. Carry on.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:45 (seventeen years ago) link

They were friendly skeletons! We think.

The importance of some sort of grounding in knowing how to be 'social' for lack of a better word is key. This doesn't mean, as Ailsa implies, a codependency or a feeling of 'if I just had *somebody* my life would be happier,' rather it's knowing how to balance out your own take on things (to put it in rough terms) with those of others, especially those whose company you value highly, as friends, relations and so forth.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Er, where did I imply codependency had anything to do with it? I made the point that my marital state had nothing at all to do with it. That I've learned to get on with myself as well as with others. And that I was pretty much OK to some others before (someone married me!) but I wasn't OK with myself. But, whatever.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I think, Ailsa, you implied that it didn't mean a codependency.

ampersand, spades, semicolon (cis), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh, I get it, you're AGREEING with me.
Hahaha, I R stupid. But I'm OK with that. I misread the intonation in the "as Ailsa implies" bit.

(xpost)

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Hahaha, I R stupid

Nah, just me being too subtle for my own good!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

I think I understand what you mean Alisa, that your relationship was not the catalyst to your change. At least that has been the case with me. A relationship might provide a good foundation to be able to make changes, but not really an impetus.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

(in that, I thought you mean "Ailsa implies X and it's not like that at all", rather than "it's Y, not X like what Ailsa was implying")

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:55 (seventeen years ago) link

oh, that's wrong too. Fuck, I'm tired. I thought you meant either of those two, but you meant "ailsa implies X and I agree with her".

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 22:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Anyway, Sam, I like to think I'd have changed outwith a relationship too. I am also very well aware I was loved and tolerated and liked and many other things before this - it's a change in *me* that maybe isn't even apparent to others. But now I've got all that and I like myself too.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 22:10 (seventeen years ago) link

(but, yeah, the stability and grounding helps as a basis, absolutely. I don't think it's that key though)

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 22:11 (seventeen years ago) link

I like to quote borat

Apple Juice (Apple Juice), Thursday, 8 February 2007 03:29 (seventeen years ago) link

it isa nice

Apple Juice (Apple Juice), Thursday, 8 February 2007 03:29 (seventeen years ago) link

This doesn't mean, as Ailsa implies, a codependency or a feeling of 'if I just had *somebody* my life would be happier,'

Allow me:

As Ailsa implies, this doesn't mean a codependency or a feeling of 'if I just had *somebody* my life would be happier,'

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i.e. learning to trust others, and having the good sense to keep away from people who hurt you or exacerbate your own personal insecurities withe the way they behave towards you.

Is such an important lesson. Disengagement. Recognising when someone does exacerbate your worst qualities, and not letting them rile you up.

But it's really difficult when those people who do exacerbate your worst behaviour view such disengagement as being "la la, I can't hear you."

Probability Smear Of Possible Quantum Katehood (kate), Thursday, 8 February 2007 11:38 (seventeen years ago) link

it shouldn't matter what they think?

Save The Whales (688), Thursday, 8 February 2007 11:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Continuing to snipe at them != "disengagement".

I don't know whether to play the trumpet, read a book or be a lesbian. (aldo_cow, Thursday, 8 February 2007 11:52 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.