Your Favorite Post-Modern Douchebag Writer

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (123 of them)
Vollmann is well worth it.

Speaking of Vollmann, does anyone know where I can get my hands on a copy of the essay he wrote for Harper's a few years back about the undeground Chinese tunnels from Southern California to Mexico? Because that was really one of the most amazing articles I've ever read in a magazine.

the table is the table, Monday, 5 March 2007 04:21 (seventeen years ago) link

also this is vollmann as a young man
http://www.themodernword.com/scriptorium/vollmann.jpg

the table is the table, Monday, 5 March 2007 04:29 (seventeen years ago) link

why do a lot of people hate on Vollmann?

he grooms this hypermacho image that can be off-putting. does showy hardass stuff like firing guns into the ceiling at his readings. some people get off on those kind of literary outlaw hijinks, but lots more don't.

as much as I enjoyed what I read of Rising Up Rising Down, I couldn't help shake the feelings of a) sensationalism and b) overreaching. he might be a better toiler than a thinker. obv a lot of hard work went into RURD, and there are some beautifully written passages, but I didn't get a sense of deep engagement with the topic at hand. maybe I should try reading the abridgement. or just buckle down and tackle the whole thing.

Edward III, Monday, 5 March 2007 04:38 (seventeen years ago) link

I haven't read much postmodern douchebag literature but i am going to throw in a vote for john barth. if i really love the sot-weed factor, are there any other books you'd recommend in that vein?

Maria, Monday, 5 March 2007 21:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh: not really in that vein at all, but my most-recommended Barth is Chimera, which is smaller and more ... umm, more compactly dazzling? Or anyway like an amazing three-bite appetizer compared to the Big Barth Books' long and potentially arduous nine-course meals.

nabisco, Monday, 5 March 2007 21:38 (seventeen years ago) link

i understand how vollmann's image can be off-putting. but i also think that...well, he has some serious cojones. firing guns during readings is stupid, but putting oneself into extraordinarily dangerous situations all the time takes some balls.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 03:20 (seventeen years ago) link

also, Barth is okay. Barthes is better.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 03:21 (seventeen years ago) link

i love DFW's short fiction... most of it anyway. sometimes it seems clinical in its description instead of rapturous and that usually turns me off unless it's going for creepy, like in that story about the focus group. i don't think i could handle something as long as infinite jest, though. i read EIMI by E.E. Cummings and that was only four hundred pages or so, but it really took a lot out of me.

the baby story is great! i tried to describe it to my therapist and i think i freaked him out.

lfam, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 05:06 (seventeen years ago) link

i understand how vollmann's image can be off-putting. but i also think that...well, he has some serious cojones. firing guns during readings is stupid, but putting oneself into extraordinarily dangerous situations all the time takes some balls.

not to, uh, minimize vollmann's cojones or anything, but there are plenty of people who put themselves in harm's way on a daily basis; war correspondents, firefighters, troops in iraq. vollmann seems to so do less out of a sense of duty than out of some weird self-destructive streak.

he does take some provocative positions that challenge accepted thinking (e.g. see his defense of the my lai massacre) which is valuable. I haven't read any of his fiction.

Edward III, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link

lfam, infinite jest is really a labor for a long summer. in more ways than one, it is among one of the best reading experience i've ever had, if only because of the self-recognition involved in reading a book about addiction and weird families.

did you ever read any of the Flow Chart i sent you?

the table is the table, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:17 (seventeen years ago) link

i know that there are plenty who put themselves in such situations, edward iii. but i think that while some of what Vollmann does can be chalked up to a self-destructive streak, i also think that a lot of what he does is based on a) his curiosity, and b) his belief system and sense of humanity... that is, where others would balk at going into the most dangerous ghettoes of La Paz or Cochabamba or Pyongyang, he does it because he holds an uncommon belief in the humanity of people (unless proven otherwise), and is unwilling to believe that such beliefs and support should only be shown from afar. that is, he practices what others mostly preach, it seems, and i respect that immensely.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Dear everyone who thinks Infinite Jest is so fucking funny,

I want to punch you in the nose. What the fuck is wrong with you?

Love, Elmo

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Seriously, it is like a New Yorker cartoon amplified a billion times.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:30 (seventeen years ago) link

someone hating on Infinite Jest SHOCKAH.

i don't really think it's that funny, except in certain parts. otherwise, it's more sad and biting than anything else.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago) link

i liked it but i don't think it's really 'funny' (or if it is funny it's not lol funny nor new yorker not-funny). the cruise ship essay and the state fair essay in 'a supposedly fun thing...', now, those are funny.

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link

someone hating on Infinite Jest SHOCKAH

That book is such a sacred cow among the contemporary literati, whatever.

Ultimately, I really don't like DFW as a narrator, what with his arch, reductive eyebrow cast down on everything.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link

(which is what I meant by comparing Infinite Jest to a New Yorker comic -- more because it involves smug, tepid 'observational' humor, not just because they are both not-funny)

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 16:45 (seventeen years ago) link

rrroby 8080. A Supposedly Fun Thing... and Consider the Lobster are genuinely hilarious in parts. Especially the titular cruise ship essay.

gbx, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 17:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Although DFW was in one of the first issues, but maybe people have forgotten about that.

Not so much in as on; his story was printed on the spine.

Which I thought was a cute enough idea.

Elmo OTM about IJ's humor being completely offputting and punchworthy; but New Yorker cartoons are so curious -- decades of feedback loops reinforming them -- that I can't dismiss them so easily.

Casuistry, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago) link

elmo and casuistry: so wrong on IJ it hurts

the real problem with Vollman is that his fiction ultimately sucks (yes, I've read The Royal Family), or if that's too harsh turns out at least to be far less than the sum of its parts

this is a strange little group, but of those five, it's Pynchon (though DFW, WTV and Saunders are really post-post, no?)

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 20:57 (seventeen years ago) link

PS - you're not tipping sacred cows, you're just not getting it at all

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 20:58 (seventeen years ago) link

"not getting it at all"

eat shit, snob.

also, thanks for enforcing my prejudice that DFW caters to elitist dickmouths.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 21:03 (seventeen years ago) link

fwiw, i did read infinite jest. (except for maybe 1/2 of the end-notes. fuck that noise.)

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 21:06 (seventeen years ago) link

(except for maybe 1/2 of the end-notes. fuck that noise.)

then you didn't really read it, did you?

in more ways than one, elmo, you're simply playing into the anti-intellectual atmosphere that pervades this ungodly world, what with statements like, "eat shit, snob." i'm not DFW's biggest defender-- a lot of his fiction, quite honestly, isn't that interesting. but IJ is an astounding book, if only because he gets so much right in it... anyone who has spent time in an inpatient drug treatment center whose read IJ will tell you that, for example.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 21:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Elmo OTM, wrt New Yorker. I'm a DFW fan, though, arch, reductive eyebrow and all.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 21:50 (seventeen years ago) link

(which is what I meant by comparing Infinite Jest to a New Yorker comic -- more because it involves smug, tepid 'observational' humor, not just because they are both not-funny)

I think there's a lot more complexity in both IJ and New Yorker cartoons than this description gives them credit for. I don't really see "smug" - that's more a presumption about the author's attitude than something that you can point to specifically in the work. As for "tepid" I guess that depends on whether you find it funny or not. I think IJ and New Yorker cartoons can be quite funny at times. As for "observational" that's a rather broad term. There is very little humor that could not be called "observational" in some sense. So in the end, your criticism doesn't say much about either IJ or New Yorker cartoons.

o. nate, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, reading this again:

in more ways than one, elmo, you're simply playing into the anti-intellectual atmosphere that pervades this ungodly world, what with statements like, "eat shit, snob."

The phrase "not getting it at all" does not signal intellect. It is a sign of snobbery. That, or teen angst.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:03 (seventeen years ago) link

thanks for enforcing my prejudice that DFW caters to elitist dickmouths

Thanks for confirming that we hate and fear what we do not understand.

That book is such a sacred cow among the contemporary literati, whatever.

UR SO PUNK

Ultimately, I really don't like DFW as a narrator, what with his arch, reductive eyebrow cast down on everything

Again, I don't know what you've been reading but it ain't DFW. If anything, he's challenging in his sincerity.

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:04 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah, I was about to say, Wallace doesn't strike me as arch at all.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:05 (seventeen years ago) link

"the anti-intellectual atmosphere that pervades this ungodly world"

Don't you think you're being a tad melodramatic, sweetie?

In your summary classification of me as anti-intellectual, you're making a pretty broad assumption about me based on my taste in literature, which nicely dovetails into the assumption that because I didn't like IJ, I must not 'get it,' and must not possess the sensitivity or erudition to comprehend it. Well done. Fuck you.

Let me submit to you there's a distinction between intelligence, intellectualism, and jerking off in your ivory tower. IJ falls squarely into the latter; please feel free to sticky the pages of your copy.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:09 (seventeen years ago) link

The phrase "not getting it at all" does not signal intellect. It is a sign of snobbery. That, or teen angst.

Meh. It's no less condescending than elmo's reading of DFW deserves. If it's snobbiste to not humor cheap pseudo-populist posing with reasoned argument, or to respond to the friendly offer of a nose-punch in kind then okay, fine, like whoa, I'm a snob.

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:10 (seventeen years ago) link

"pseudo-populist posing"

I'm not championing the fiction of Tom Fucking Clancy, am I? WTF.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:16 (seventeen years ago) link

the real problem with Vollman is that his fiction ultimately sucks...
If it's snobbiste to not humor cheap pseudo-populist posing with reasoned argument, or to respond to the friendly offer of a nose-punch in kind then okay, fine, like whoa, I'm a snob.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:19 (seventeen years ago) link

It also seems strange to me to categorically dismiss all New Yorker cartoons. They aren't monolithic. The cartoonists have distinctive styles and senses of humor that run the gamut from Far Side absurdism to Family Circle insipidness to many less precedented places in between.

o. nate, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:20 (seventeen years ago) link

cheap pseudo-populist

ding ding ding.

Of course I'm being melodramatic, but you're not offering much to the conversation except unfunny retorts and bile aimed against a book and a writer without offering any justification. Except "omg ivory tower new yorker snobbery blahdy fucking blah." Which isn't much.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:21 (seventeen years ago) link

oops, I meant "Family Circus" - not "Family Circle".

o. nate, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:22 (seventeen years ago) link

That might actually be interesting though! An argument for Clancy (or Grisham) would be perverse and provocative, but might get closer to whatever it is you're objecting to in your version of Wallace. e.g., "In keeping with Foucault's practice of supporting the right of marginalized communities to speak for themselves, without the mediation of more "qualified" or "right-minded" intellectual elites, REAL pomo concretizes and valorizes a readerly public preference for unchallenging vocabularies, simple sentences, event-driven plots, and tidy revolutions. The true source of post-postmodern fictions is not Joyce, but Dickens."

You haven't championed anything in this thread yet. The posing has to do with the tough-guy persona you've adopted in thios thread and the notion that you're somehow tilting at ivory towers and exposing imperial nudity because IJ didn't, you know, do it for you.

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:25 (seventeen years ago) link

whoops - forgot no more xpost warnings - post above obv responding to:

I'm not championing the fiction of Tom Fucking Clancy, am I? WTF.

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Apparently, Infinite Jest engenders as many cultists as Dianetics.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:31 (seventeen years ago) link

fluffybear - dunno who anybody is anymore nuILXland - you're reading a lot into that Vollman statement, especially given that you've quoted it out of context.

He's a brilliant prose writer, and his reportage is always worth reading. Like Pynchon, he writes such a great English sentence that he's pretty much worth it for that alone. Along with his eye for place, character, and the telling detail, this serves him very well in both fiction and non-fiction - what kills the fiction for me is that he's noticeably weaker when it comes to endings. Like Neal Stephenson, he tends to trivialize what works do well earlier in attempting to bring it all to a close. So not a "favorite douchebag," and more valuable as a nonfiction writer. Is all.

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:31 (seventeen years ago) link

For the record: I am on 2 hours sleep, and about to go home to get some more. I'm pretty cranky, but having my intelligence called into question is not going to improve things. More than anything about the book itself, which I obviously dislike, I resent that it stands as a badge of intellectualism for anyone who dares to plough through its endless run-on sentences and self-congratulatory asides. I really don't want a place in that clique!

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:49 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/31366

(NB: I like what Pynchon I've read.)

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:50 (seventeen years ago) link

Fair enough - I'll only point out that opening with the punch-in-the-nose thing was provocative.

PS you probably wouldn't like The Unnameable then...

nurogermexico, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 22:51 (seventeen years ago) link

About Vollman: I think he suffers from a degenerative eye disease that will make him go blind. Which is why, I have always thought, he goes on those risky assignments/trips.

aimurchie, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 23:25 (seventeen years ago) link

maybe IJ stands for "a badge of intellectualism" among people seeking a badge of intellectualism - just as many things (books, music, art, film, wine knowledge, etc etc) do or are made to do. yes, it's a pretty heady/academic/intellectual book, but (in my opinion obv) it's also a compelling story - when i read it (1998) i'd only read a couple dfw essays in magazines, knew nothing about him nor had read any criticism. i don't read things because i 'should' (uh, unless they're assigned to me), and would've put IJ down fast if i wasn't getting something from it (as i've done with many books people have told me i just had to read (hello, 'underworld' with bookmark at p.80)).
it's fair that people would dislike IJ for its writing style, story, tone, etc, but to dislike it for standing for something outside the text, however socially&culturally relevant that is, shouldn't be the basis of critique.

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 23:35 (seventeen years ago) link

wld not want to be in dfw clique. have read fan sites and whoa, ew, bored.

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 23:38 (seventeen years ago) link

as i said before, i'm not in any DFW fan club... and his rabid fans make me want to rip my hair out. i knew a kid once who travelled 6 hours to hear him give a speech, and i was like, 'uh...dude.'

i'm sorry for being unnecessarily rude upthread, elmo. i just want to know why you be hating so hard. and as said upthread (and xpost), hating anything simply for what it stands for in the culture (and not based on its own merits) doesn't make much sense to me.

that said, some people hate run-on sentences and endnotes. more power to you-- just don't insult the rest of us who like IJ.

the table is the table, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 00:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Ultimately, I really don't like DFW as a narrator, what with his arch, reductive eyebrow cast down on everything

Again, I don't know what you've been reading but it ain't DFW. If anything, he's challenging in his sincerity.


THANK YOU...you get this a lot when discussing DFW, and if anything I always read his verbose prose as the work of a guy that MEANS it SO MUCH he CAN'T STOP telling you WHAT he's TRYING TO SAY in GREAT DETAIL....

i love his sincerity.

actually, too, i think his use of footnotes is interesting, because i think lots of people see that as some sort of post modern trickery, but a few times i've re-read a short story or essay that i already know and don't read the footnotes....the pieces are still totally readable and coherent, so maybe he's just trying to make it easier for people that don't want all the added detail to skip over stuff if they choose?

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 00:39 (seventeen years ago) link

and he doesn't seem like some kinda NYC snobby dude to me, like at all...he feels real midwest, dorky, to me.....stuff like his essays in Consider the Lobster about watching 9/11 with his neighbors and the put-down of recent Updike are pretty down to earth, really, style issues anyone might have w/him aside.

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 00:44 (seventeen years ago) link

one year passes...

Dear everyone who thinks Infinite Jest is so fucking funny,

I want to punch you in the nose. What the fuck is wrong with you?

Love, Elmo
-- elmo argonaut, Tuesday, March 6, 2007 4:27 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

Seriously, it is like a New Yorker cartoon amplified a billion times.
-- elmo argonaut, Tuesday, March 6, 2007 4:30 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

i don't really think it's that funny, except in certain parts. otherwise, it's more sad and biting than anything else.
-- the table is the table, Tuesday, March 6, 2007 4:34 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

so so so RONG

Mr. Que, Thursday, 8 May 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not that I think Pynchon shares the views of his characters as much as it is that entire sequence so unbelievably offensive to me that its point was completely swamped, kind of like a more visceral version of the reaction I had to the original "Funny Games".

HI DERE, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

my favorite Pynchon gag is when Slothrop's harmonica falls into the toilet in GR and he crawls in after it.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

also between the jewish stereotypes and Dahoud The Gargantuan Negro it can be pretty hard to tell he doesn't mean it early on

(Dan the comparison to Funny Games is really well-taken, even if Pynchon's not as obnoxiously DO YOU SEE)

rogermexico., Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

btw, HAPPY 71st BDAY THOMAS PYNCHON!

rogermexico., Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

so has DeLillo done anything good since Underworld or has he just lost it?

Cosmopolis --> read the jacket copy, thought "this sounds terrible"
Body Artist --> zzzz
the 9/11 one (Falling Man?) --> ???

dmr, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

WOOOOOOOOOOO!

Oilyrags, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:07 (sixteen years ago) link

out of all these huge books I think I'd get the most out of re-reading Gravity's Rainbow .... but somehow I don't see that happening. maybe someday.

dmr, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

FWIW, i haven't read any Vollman. Where does I start?

ian, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Every review I read of the Falling Man thought it was pretty poor. I can't think of many subjects I want to read DeLillo tackle less. 9/11 would probably bring out the worst in DeLillo and at his worst he can be overwraught and cliche-ridden.

Mason & Dixon is probably Pynchon's most overtly angry anti-racist/anti-colonist book - I mean it starts with them rollicking around South Africa with barely a care in the world and ends with, among other things, Dixon beating the living shit out of an American slave-owner, not to mention all the native American stuff in there.

Matt DC, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I liked Falling Man better than the last two, but that ain't saying much.

jaymc, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

so has DeLillo done anything good since Underworld or has he just lost it?

yeah, i tried to read the body artist? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.i guess he's lost it? maybe he'll come back with something good.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

*than the PREVIOUS two, I mean

jaymc, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, my opinion of Cosmopolis is based on reading the first 10 pages and then throwing the book across the room, so maybe it gets better.

jaymc, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

9/11 would probably bring out the worst in DeLillo and at his worst he can be overwraught and cliche-ridden.

yep I think that's OTM. I didn't like the chapter that ran in the New Yorker as a short story so I tended to believe the bad reviews ....

dmr, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

I just read this--I liked it a lot. Her style in this book reminded me of Delillo, or I thought it did and then, LOL I realized the book was set in the Delillo typeface. So maybe that influenced me.

http://www.powells.com/biblio/61-9781593761844-0

Mr. Que, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

WHAT IS WRONGW YOU PEOPLE????

sunny successor, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

can you expand on that? maybe with some footnotes?

dmr, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Has anyone here read Barth's End of the Road? I haven't met anyone else who has, and I've never recommended it. I just wanted to know if anyone else thinks that it's maybe the most overwhelmingly depressing thing written in the English language or if it's just me.

Deric W. Haircare, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno what could be more depressing than the diary of anne frank, quite honestly.

ian, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I read it for a philosophy class in college but remember practically nothing about it.

jaymc, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

anyone have recommendations for William Gass? read and liked Omensetter's Luck but I've never run across anything else by him

dmr, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i've only read The Floating Opera by Barth. Don't remember a thing about it.

i don't know that gass has much besides a handful of stories, novellas, and the two novels, the big one and the little one. and lots of essays. his recent essay called the sentence seeks a form or whatever was really awesome. i was going to try and tackle The Tunnel this summer. i liked the first section of Omensetter's Luck (the old guy at the auction) but it fell off after that for me.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I've only read Barth's Chimera and found it pretty annoying in a "wow, witness the birth of a whole strain of postmodern meta douchebaggery" sort of way

probably not really the birth but it's one of the earlier things I've read where the plot reads like charlie kaufmann, the author is a character in his own story etc etc

dmr, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I've only read Cervantes' Don Quixote and found it pretty annoying in a "wow, witness the birth of a whole strain of postmodern meta douchebaggery" sort of way

probably not really the birth but it's one of the earlier things I've read where the plot reads like charlie kaufmann, the author is a character in his own story etc etc

Noodle Vague, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

zing

dmr, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

anyone have recommendations for William Gass? read and liked Omensetter's Luck but I've never run across anything else by him

-- dmr, Thursday, May 8, 2008 1:28 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i just read in the heart of the heart of the country and loved it, see if u can find it

max, Thursday, 8 May 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i picked up a collection of william gass essays and skipped through them a little while ago - now i can't remember the goddamn name - but it looked really really good.

i got 'the recognitions' from the library last year, but it just sat on my bedside table cuz i was too scared to read it... heard WAY too much stuff about its difficulty beforehand so now i'm completely intimidated.

Rubyredd, Thursday, 8 May 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

in re: Gass, I read <i>The Tunnel</i>; I don't know if I can recommend the experience, but if the postmodern novel with loads of unpleasantry is what you go in for, it's as elegantly executed a version of that as I can imagine. some of the scenes in it will be with me forever. When Gass released his reading of the entire novel on something like half a dozen CDs I couldn't resist getting them though, felt like I sort of had to, having already invested so much time & effort on the book. The mp3s make for great airplane listeneing.

in re: DeLillo - I always find the "novelist who lost it narrative" kinda "hmm, is there more to this?" - it feels like it owes a fair amount to the way we parse rock and roll (where the band whose first album rules but whose work is in continual decline is a known trope), when the more common literary trope is or was "early work immature; middle period = height of powers; late period = maturity." I mean there's Wordsworth, who's generally conceded to have "lost it," but late novels of great writers are often the heavy hitters: Jude the Obscure, Middlemarch, Great Expectations, just off the top of my head; struggling to think of great-or-considered-really-good writers whose late work is thought of as having fallen drastically off. I mean, unless one's craft is "I am insanely inventive and always coming up with new! new! stuff," it seems to me that writers would reliably get better with practice. that said though I haven't read any recent DeLillo, once I'd done White Noise & Great Jones Street & Libra & Mao I figured I'd had about enough.

J0hn D., Friday, 9 May 2008 01:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Underworld is great! definitely recommend that one.

struggling to think of great-or-considered-really-good writers whose late work is thought of as having fallen drastically off

maybe Updike? I don't really know what type of reviews he gets.

dmr, Friday, 9 May 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

do people rep for Roth's late work?

ian, Friday, 9 May 2008 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I think Roth has a better rep right now as far as his older stuff goes versus Updike. dmr OTM, Updike's stuff has fallen way off. he got okay reviews for the first couple of these, i think mostly on his rep. but Terrorist got horrible reviews. Exit Ghost got some bad reviews, but American Pastoral, Sabbath's Theatre and The Plot Against America have gotten raves, nothing like Updike's had in years, IMHO.

(1996) In the Beauty of the Lilies
(1997) Toward the End of Time
(2000) Gertrude and Claudius
(2002) Seek My Face
(2004) Villages
(2006) Terrorist

compare this with Roth:

Sabbath's Theater (1995)
American Pastoral (1997)
I Married a Communist (1998)
The Human Stain (2000)
The Plot Against America (2004)
Everyman (2006)
Exit Ghost (2007)

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 May 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

someone on this board just wrote their doctoral thesis on roth, but i dont remember who. g00blar?

max, Friday, 9 May 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

yup

Ask me about the work of Philip Roth

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 May 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.