Erykah Badu: C /D, S&D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2205 of them)

Biggest problem with Nu Amerykah pt.2 is that it's...Nu Amerykah pt. 2. There's no way it could stand with pt. 1, which is one of the decade's great album, prolley one of the greatest albums of pop music. She uses the same methodology as she did in pt. 1, but gets rid of all the apocalypticism.

I will say, however, that there is a genuine lazy streak throughout the album that is quite frustrating--the straight up track-jacks, the way that Lost My Mind is Green Eyes warmed over...but E. has already given us two of the greeatest albums of this last decade; I can't stay mad at her too long.

ranked #12 amongst 'false metallers' (Drugs A. Money), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 16:27 (thirteen years ago) link

prolley one of the greatest albums of pop music

whoa

emotional radiohead whatever (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 16:36 (thirteen years ago) link

no disagreement on my part

d4n, d4n, d4n (yaosah, yaosah, yaosah) (The Reverend), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 16:37 (thirteen years ago) link

That "Green Eyes" is a masterpiece does not automatically mean that "Out My Mind" is not also pretty damned great.

2 + 2 is vah-gi-nah (Eric H.), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 16:48 (thirteen years ago) link

But, yeah, there is a little bit of a lazy streak running throughout the album. Only I'd say "lackadaisical" instead of "lazy."

2 + 2 is vah-gi-nah (Eric H.), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 16:49 (thirteen years ago) link

dont get everyone riding so hard for amerykah pt 1 over pt 2 -- i mean i do to the degree that its a DIFFICULT RECORD (zzz) but yeesh

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 17:12 (thirteen years ago) link

all i know is i'm pretty sure i've never made it through pt 1 once in one listen, but i've listened to all of pt 2 a bunch of times. admittedly, i am very lazy.

emotional radiohead whatever (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 17:43 (thirteen years ago) link

pt 1 speaks to me in a personal way, pt 2 doesn't. simple as that

king boy swag (The Reverend), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 19:11 (thirteen years ago) link

dont get everyone riding so hard for amerykah pt 1 over pt 2 -- i mean i do to the degree that its a DIFFICULT RECORD (zzz) but yeesh

― NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:12 PM (3 hours ago)

get ouuuuta here with this faux-naive bs, you're better than this - it's not "difficult" it just "has songs"

max skim (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 21:17 (thirteen years ago) link

pt 2 doesn't have 'songs' now? that's as bs as suggesting pt 1 is the 'difficult' record

my own views are highly progressive (stevie), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link

Pt. 1 is the white record, Pt. 2 is the black one.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 22:02 (thirteen years ago) link

i'm white btw

max skim (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 22:03 (thirteen years ago) link

Pt. 1 is the white record, Pt. 2 is the black one.

― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:02 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

LOL

ranked #12 amongst 'false metallers' (Drugs A. Money), Tuesday, 24 August 2010 22:24 (thirteen years ago) link

Pt. 1 is the white record, Pt. 2 is the black one.

― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:02 PM Suggest Ban Permalink
Bookmark

i realize you state this at least partly in jest, but you have no idea how fucking enraged this statement makes me.

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 04:23 (thirteen years ago) link

almost just said "fuck you" and left it at that tbh

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 04:23 (thirteen years ago) link

thought he was talking about Beatles v Metallica tbh

this isn't STRAWBERRY 0_o it's RAWBERRY (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 05:22 (thirteen years ago) link

It wasn't even "partly in jest" -- it's totally in jest.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 10:57 (thirteen years ago) link

'white' & 'black' are totally the wrong words to describe the differences between the two records but there are totally ideological differences in preferring one over the other imo ... the 1st one is the public enemy record, the 2nd one is the sade record

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 16:54 (thirteen years ago) link

One is the "Spike Lee" album, the other is the "Bill Cosby" album

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 16:57 (thirteen years ago) link

pretty sure most everyone itt loves both pe and sade

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 17:23 (thirteen years ago) link

pretty sure most people not 100% behind this record were into her previous 'sade' moments too

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 17:56 (thirteen years ago) link

also pretty sure most people itt who are not 100% into this record are like... 85% into this record

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:18 (thirteen years ago) link

65%-75% with reservations

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:25 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm definitely more into this record after having just endured a wobbly tenor sing "Master Blaster" at the karaoke event next door.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:29 (thirteen years ago) link

pretty sure most everyone itt loves both pe and sade

― king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:23 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

and most like both records. i think there are difft value systems at work in preferring one over the other

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:32 (thirteen years ago) link

sure. but why is one inherently more valid than the other?

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:37 (thirteen years ago) link

theyre not. id say that one is a lil more critic friendly, tho

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:38 (thirteen years ago) link

which matters why?

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:40 (thirteen years ago) link

bcuz it impacts how ppl talk about the relative values they bring to bear on each record & it helps to interrogate not just what ppl think but why they think that way

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:43 (thirteen years ago) link

i completely disagree that any preference between these two particular albums is "ideological" - i know where deej is coming from w/r/t the value systems at play, but there are plenty of other reasons to prefer one over the other.

i think they complement each other just about perfectly, as they're meant to.

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:44 (thirteen years ago) link

i completely disagree that any preference between these two particular albums is "ideological" - i know where deej is coming from w/r/t the value systems at play, but there are plenty of other reasons to prefer one over the other.

nah i mean basically all judgments are results of value systems. or are your tastes entirely random? might explain some things

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:46 (thirteen years ago) link

nah i mean basically all judgments are results of value systems

only if you apply the same value systems to all judgments you make. it doesn't follow that preferring the "political"/experimental side of the new amerykah albums over the "personal"/familiar one that you necessarily privilege political and experimental art over personal and familiar art, because those things aren't ever good or bad in themselves, they're just neutral descriptions.

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 18:58 (thirteen years ago) link

only if you apply the same value systems to all judgments you make.

theres no way out of this dude

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:04 (thirteen years ago) link

lex otm

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:04 (thirteen years ago) link

it doesn't follow that preferring the "political"/experimental side of the new amerykah albums over the "personal"/familiar one that you necessarily privilege political and experimental art over personal and familiar art, because those things aren't ever good or bad in themselves, they're just neutral descriptions.

obv this is true tho -- that doesnt mean that the recognition that these are in fact value systems interacting shouldn't be a part of the discussion

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:05 (thirteen years ago) link

deej, are your reactions to art always consistent? cause if so that makes you quite unique among human beings.

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:06 (thirteen years ago) link

how on earth is that what im talking about

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:06 (thirteen years ago) link

i dont even understand what the question means -- my 'reactions' to 'art' 'consistent'? they are consistently mine certainly, & the values we bring to bear are our own only -- im just talking about the act of openly acknowledging those values

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:07 (thirteen years ago) link

only if you apply the same value systems to all judgments you make.

theres no way out of this dude

― NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:04 PM Suggest Ban Permalink
Bookmark

????

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:08 (thirteen years ago) link

i would say a better example of a preference based on "ideology" would be someone who doesn't particular rate or pay attention to any badu album except pt1 - someone who wasn't interested in her until she made a political record, say, and who's disappointed that pt2 isn't as ~experimental~ or whatever. which i don't think anyone here is.

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:10 (thirteen years ago) link

of course there are different value systems at play, but there is very little, if any, music within pt. 1's system that i prefer to it, whereas there is a fair amount within pt. 2's system that i do prefer. that doesn't mean i inherently prefer one value system to the other, even if i think this whole line of argument is more or less bunk.

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:12 (thirteen years ago) link

you cant help but apply your own values to every critical argument you make. how do you apply someone elses?

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:12 (thirteen years ago) link

of course there are different value systems at play, but there is very little, if any, music within pt. 1's system that i prefer to it, whereas there is a fair amount within pt. 2's system that i do prefer. that doesn't mean i inherently prefer one value system to the other, even if i think this whole line of argument is more or less bunk.

― king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:12 PM (27 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

youre not understanding 'value system' -- thats the broad biases/opinions/values/morals that the critic brings to bear; the piece of art has no 'value system' of its own, just what we bring to it

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:13 (thirteen years ago) link

you cant help but apply your own values to every critical argument you make. how do you apply someone elses?

― NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:12 PM Suggest Ban Permalink
Bookmark

whoever said anything about that?

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:13 (thirteen years ago) link

"only if you apply the same value systems to all judgments you make."

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:17 (thirteen years ago) link

from a critics perspective what values are their other than your own

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:18 (thirteen years ago) link

you can hold different (and inconsistent) values yourself, which is what i assume lex meant by that

king boy swag (The Reverend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:19 (thirteen years ago) link

not if yr trying to make a convincing argument; if u hold two opposing ideas that in order to convince anyone u have to come up with an explanation for why one system works in one situation and another doesnt

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:20 (thirteen years ago) link

especially in a case like this, when the two value systems aren't even opposed to each other or mutually exclusive

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:20 (thirteen years ago) link

your assuming im making some argument im not if there as a 'situation like this'

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:22 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.