The long overdue _Blade Runner_ thread

Rob, looks like you're onto something:

31st January 2006

The Digital Bits has reported on an official Warner's press conference:

"And finally, here's a bit of news that's going to get a lot of you excited (and I made a point to specifically ask about this title, believe me)... Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) is currently on track for release as a multi-disc special edition in time for its 25th anniversary in 2007. The release is far from certain (as usual, there's a lot more that I can't post about this title yet - think of the old saying, "Loose lips sink ships"), but Warner says that work is proceeding, most of the key players are involved and things are "looking good" for release next year. We'll see."

2nd February 2006

As the century has progressed I got a bit tired of saying there is no BR:SE news, but as BR DVD restocking has gradually been diminishing in various regions and I have heard the usual odd rumours, I've been preparing a proper update of this page this week to go along with the sitewide update I'm doing. Then the above announcement was made. But let us put it in context - it came at the end of a press conference where many definite Warner releases for 2006/7 were being announced. This comment about Blade Runner is almost an afterthought - sort of an, "I can't say anything definite, but we're still trying and keeping the hope alive". In other words, not much more than the comment made below almost two years ago. So don't get too excited. 2007 is the 25th aniversary of the release of Blade Runner of course, which is added incentive, but we thought it would be released for the 20th anniversary, so it is still wait and see what happens at the moment.

I hate that stupid unicorn scene.

you both need to pay attention... i said close encounters of the third kind was the forrest gump of sci-fi. close encounters was directed by spielberg.

this didn't mean anything until the movie was recut to have the unicorn dream in it though.

f.h., hence my reading comprehension comment! Go back and read what vahid was replying to when he started on his "SO AND SO CAN DO THIS BUT SPIELBERG CAN'T?" thing (hint: "2. trivializing history"). C'mon guys.

RJG I kiss u still.

Back to the Future...huh.

"Sushi...raw fish."

it's so amazing to me that ridley scott made these two movies that just totally changed cinema sci-fi

I guess I missed a whole lot of post-Alien boring haunted-house movies set in spaceships.

event horizon! (sooooooooooo bad.)

i'll grant that lang vs. scott is no kind of comparison at all. but i think metropolis is a weak movie, plotwise, with convoluted -- nay, incoherent -- politics and characters who could be generously described as two-dimensional. what it's (rightly, justly) famous for is its design and vision of da future. but that's what blade runner is rightly, justly admired for too, and i think blade runner's story and characters are more coherent, and the cast is a lot better. so i think it's a better movie, lang's general genius notwithstanding.

BECAUSE HE WANTS MORE LIFE FUCKER

anyway, which mad max are you checking there in yr list vahid? speaking of adolescent film experiences, the 2nd one blew my leetle mind, age 15 or so. the simplicity of the plot and the agorophobic blankness of the setting really got to me, and i was like, "this is like a greek myth or something dood."

yeah, there's the whole "expanding the general vocabulary of film" thing that you can't get around w/ lang.

the crowd scenes in metropolis were the first of their kind, right?

I'm still not really clear on why this is such a terrible thing to say. Breaking up with someone because you don't think they're very smart is a great reason to break up with someone -- one of the best reasons there is, I think. Just about everyone on this thread with any kind of dating history has probably done it (or, um, had it done to them).

Breaking up with someone because they don't like the film/music/whatever you like...well, maybe that's a little more questionable, but still, especially with film, who wants to spend your life fighting with someone, or slowly losing respect for them, because you're just not on the same wavelength?

(And would anyone really argue that strongly differing tastes in art can mean -- doesn't always mean, but can mean -- that there's an underlying personality difference that may prove to be a problem? Or that it can be just a wee bit alienating?)

So given all that: are people coming down on Kenan just because they don't think much of him, and so they're inclined to take the most negative interpretation of what he says...even if it's something that, if phrased a little more carefully (I'd leave out the "as smart as I am" bit, for starters) and posted by someone else, would get a free pass?

Ah seen things you people wouldn' buhlieve.

It is suggestive of something that I've seen Poltergeist and Blade Runner any number of times but I only ever saw E. T. once in the theaters during its original run. And even then I missed the middle section cause I was bored and went to play video games in the theater lobby.

Krull...er, wait.

Ha! I wish I could have that movie permanently removed from my memory