New Apple Lust Objects for 2010 and onward

Pretty sure any streaming music operation they come up will require some form of DRM.

I think technically, streaming IS DRM. As in, it's not downloading.

yeah DRM is redundant, especially if the app is on iPhone/iPad, which are already locked down

I think technically, with spotify at least, streaming is downloading

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/31/spotify_crypto/

but downloading in a protected format, no?

typical of apple to not let you keep streamed music : (

who lets you keep streamed music? It's always been this way...streamed music is treated like radio, and paid for the same way? Spotify pays labels, whereas streaming radio and similar services (Viva Radio, ie.) deal with publishing.

limewire and soulseek let you keep streamed music. h8 u steve job$$

I believe caek was kidding, but anyway, the "keeping streaming music thing" is a silly discussion. The whole point is that you don't have to keep it. If you own the music and want to have a copy on the device, you just sync.

If you're a dirty thief and want to keep streamed music you don't own, you'd have to jailbreak your iOS device and install some sneaky software to rip it. I doubt Apple would bother to take any DRM effort beyond that.

"today we're launching an app called store. this takes in mp3s, tv shows, apps etc. all of this shitty funcionality is being divested from itunes and with itunes 11 the application now only plays and manages music. merry christmas"

^^^^^^^^^^^
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_pFuueSeWrVs/TCn4K0NgKWI/AAAAAAAASZg/cBFlG8a4Ols/coolaideyes.png

Actual announcement more like

http://imgur.com/aMDZM.jpg

theyre actually just giving up on iTunes and everything associated w/ it so sorry d00dz

Well:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703326204575617004052395816.html?mod=e2tw

Terms of the deal that brought the Beatles music to iTunes could not be learned.

Pagan sacrifice, etc

laaaaaaame

Woop woop. Because previously it was nigh on impossible to find those Beatles albums.

anyone can go on Ebay and get the entire Beatles catalogue remastered for like $60 used

why they are bothering selling music by this shitty band?

everyone i know buys their music on cd on ebay these days anyway, especially when buying gifts in december. apple FAIL.

I suspect that there are an equal number of people who give a $50 gift card with a note that says YOU HAVE TO BUY FIVE BEATLES ALBUMS and people buying box sets on Ebay. Both of which are smaller in number than the people who'll just go on Demonoid/Piratebay and get that shit for free if they just want it on their iPod.

otm. can't wait for steve jobs to eat humble (apple!) pie over this when no one buys these albums.

Turn off your mind, relax and download a stream.

I can't decide if you guys are str8 trollin' or being willfully difficult if you are saying no one will buy the Beatles from iTunes. I don't know if you realize how many 50+ year olds have fallen into iTunes being the only "right" way to download music from the internets.

omg

worst news

http://i55.tinypic.com/2yx1af8.jpg

no, i am being serious when i say all the 50 year olds i know buy their cds on ebay. if anything apple will LOSE money on this.

None of the 50 year olds I buy that AREN'T serious music collectors download from iTunes.

Er, switch that. Make "None" = "All".

theyre right though, ill never forget the day that apple made it sound like they had a huge announcement and it turned out that theyre just getting rights to some music i dont care about

RIP apple

xxp How many 50 year-olds have you ever bought?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY

thinking about steve jobs, watching the reaction on twitter. hope he is ok.

I'm not saying Apple won't make bank - only that it's not Earth-shattering news, particularly since it's been exactly one year since Beatles fans rebought the albums they care about.

otm

FWIW, there's also this:

http://www.macrumors.com/2010/11/15/hints-of-itunes-live-stream-service-found-in-itunes-10-1/

even if the news is just the beatles, you know this is going to be in every news outlet in the world, right?

Going to wait until the copyrights run out and download it all free from archive.org.

who the fuck are the beatle

Spotify doesn't pay the labels enough for them to want to do it

Interestingly, a friend of mine had a meeting with Spotify recently and they told him that they now pay (in total) more in royalties in the UK than iTunes do. How much of this reaches the artists, I don't know.

YELLOW IPHONE

$_$

I would be surprised if the Beatles stuff is just a small piece of whatever announcement is happening tomorrow. Could be wrong, of course...

Interestingly, a friend of mine had a meeting with Spotify recently and they told him that they now pay (in total) more in royalties in the UK than iTunes do. How much of this reaches the artists, I don't know.

― Alba, Monday, 15 November 2010 18:33 (26 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Given that apple will only be paying royalties for streaming previews at the moment, (sales stuff handled through the labels), this wouldn't be hard.

Not sure I follow you. I don't think they were making a cute point that excluded royalties from iTunes sales on a technicality.

(I think the word "royalties" was mine, if that's the confusion. The point was that labels were getting more money from Spotify than from iTunes. It's all rather roundabout, because the labels themselves have a stake in Spotify, but anyway)

I find that hard to believe.