New Apple Lust Objects for 2010 and onward

xp

that music tab on the screenshot you linked, that's where you choose what playlists to sync

Two clicks + a drag my arse. Every time I add new music to iTunes I have to remember what it all was so I can drag it to the 60Gb iPod. Dragging all doesn't work because 95Gb of music won't fit on a 60Gb iPod (see above).

Make a smart playlist that selects tracks based on "most recently added." Limit it on size or number of tracks.

i have one of those that is anything added in the last three months. mad useful for finding stuff you added and forgot to do something with (e.g. listen to).

i think itunes actually creates something like that by default in new itunes profiles now, but my profile is 2001 vintage.

i've got playlists for "last week" "last 2 weeks" "last month" and "last year"

:-/

re itunes history, this is relevant to my interests:

http://panic.com/extras/audionstory/

daamn aa pulling out 'only sync checked items' at the last second ftw, fanboys pwnd

check yrself iirc

whats that alll i hear is youthful applause

re itunes history, this is relevant to my interests:

http://panic.com/extras/audionstory/

― caek, Saturday, November 20, 2010 8:48 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

p interesting, those dudes shouldve totally gone to work for apple created itunes etc

I'm with AA, I guess. In order not to hear the fucking Conet Project when I hit shuffle on my entire catalogue, I just uncheck them. Click + Shift + Click seems easier than opening up a new playlist, going through a freakin' Boolean ARTIST IS NOT "CONET PROJECT" search.

there's a "do not show up in shuffle" option

f it doesn't work out then quit itunes and take a backup of everything in ~/Music/iTunes (except the MP3s themselves, you don't need to backup those) before you do anything.

― caek, Sunday, 21 November 2010 12:23 (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalin

See this worries me, particularly as the Apple TV problem is likely to get under my feet twice a year. I still don't think I should do anything at all.

I wish you could sort (roughly) by date added and have it still display album by artist

backups:

i've been using a fw drive with a ccc partition, and a tm partition - and it seems to work well (with filevault too). now, with these time machine backups running i'm wondering how often, really, i need to do a ccc backup (i turned the automation of that off, it seemed to play nicer when it was manual - obv this is going to happen less often - hence the question!). a ccc backup whenever new applications have been installed?

both are good to have, and I think we've talked about this in this thread or in other apple threads? basically ccc/super duper for when your main HD bites the bullet and you need to restore as quick as possible. time machine if you need to access older versions of files.

if your main purpose for backing up is just to have a bootable backup, ccc/super duper is a better choice than time machine

clone with ccc or superduper once a week. assuming ccc has a smart update thing that only copies what has changed it shouldn't take more than 20 minutes. put it on a schedule.

thats actually what i've been doing, using both, each on a different partition (which is then duplicated offsite) - i'm just wondering what the extra benefit of having ccc run on a schedule is (given that that is already happening on the time machine partition) - only reason i ask is i had a bit of a problem when ccc ran on a schedule (cant actually remember exactly what it was but it hung and wouldn't let me log out) - doing the ccc manually is obviously less likely to be frequent but at same time doing it that way is a good reminder to swap the onsite and offsite externals!

time machine and a clone are not the same thing, so when deciding whether to run ccc on a schedule, tm is irrelevant. it's like "i call my mum once a week" doesn't mean you don't need to call your wife.

i don't use ccc so not sure about the hangs.

See this worries me, particularly as the Apple TV problem is likely to get under my feet twice a year. I still don't think I should do anything at all.

look, you don't have to touch the checks until you're sure my suggestion works for you. you can go back to the way you were doing it in ten seconds.

what i'm saying is, _when_ you realise my solution works, you _may_ want to recheck unchecked songs and, _if_ you want, just before you do that, you _could_ backup your itunes metadata files, just in case. of course as a linux user who knows what they're doing you're backing up to clones and incremental backups anyway, so this advice is irrelevant.

But you said the word "backup"! Run for the hills!

time machine and a clone are not the same thing, so when deciding whether to run ccc on a schedule, tm is irrelevant. it's like "i call my mum once a week" doesn't mean you don't need to call your wife.

this is what i mean though (i think) - if the time machine partition is taking care of home directories and original files the whole time, its not so important for the clone to be taking care of that side (if i can boot up from say a 3 week old clone - could get anything newer than 3 weeks old from the time machine partition) - like the way i understand it, the clone for the system (+data) and the time machine for the data?

(i have no idea what word i meant to type when i typed 'original'!)

what you say is true but ideally the clone should be a full clone and as close to up to date as is practical.

i'm not sure what the issue is. is it that ccc's schedule thing doesn't work, or that you want to back up less often?

however often you backup it should be on a schedule, not a manual process. you will forget it or postpone it if it's manual.

its mainly the scheduling part of CCC gave me issues, hung my computer and refused to let me log out (or even kill the process from the cli)

you are right about forgetting if its manual (tho hopefully time machine should back up everything too)

As i swap the onsite and offsite disks i'm not really sure how i'm going to get round the manual aspect of it!

although part of me is perhaps thinking about backing up less often with ccc (and more often with time machine) so i know the clone is stable (and if i do something i dont clone the problem!), knowing that time machine has my data covered

(if i do something *stupid* i dont clone the problem - is waht i meant to say)

haven't used ccc for years, i use superduper. it's not free but scheduling works. set it to clone to one drive in even weeks (e.g.) and one in odd weeks. it will throw up an error if the drive isn't connected, which will remind you to swap the offsite.

i see what you mean about having an old version to go back to, but your time machine does that imo. the clone is your "get me back where i was just before the internal hard drive died" backup, and your time machine is "give me an old version of a file".

you may want to hold off on cloning for a few days/weeks/whatever when you install a big system update though

there is one other v v impt use for the checkboxes: when you want a song to play, and JUST that song, i.e. don't continue to the next song automatically. in radio stations, for instance, this is extremely handy.

i have an "in rotation" playlist that syncs to my ipod. (i use hazel to automatically add new tracks to that playlist). i don't like "smart" playlists because i don't feel in control. every now and again i prune the "in rotation" playlist. for me it feels more logical to have a playlist of stuff that i want to hear, rather than a playlist full of stuff i don't want to hear.

(i use hazel to automatically add new tracks to that playlist). i don't like "smart" playlists because i don't feel in control.

does not compute

i don't even use playlists either. just select 'music' and browse by artist/album and manually arrange things. I don't understand how anyone would do this differently. my way is best and is the only true way.

otm synching is 4 noobs

But caek, I don't need to change anything.

Consistent use of ratings + smart playlists is the way to go. Always surprised to see so many people neglecting the rating system

the ratings system requires an enormous amount of attentive anality to make any sense

Nah. If I like a song I give it four stars, if I REALLY like it I give it five stars. Then I have 'good' (4-5) and 'best' (5) smart playlists to make sense of it all, the end.

oof, yeah, it's great for micromanaging a certain kind of playlist, i guess, but fuck if i have the time to contemplate the starriness of all 60GBs of my music

Ah, see I rated all my music back in the 45Gb days.

if i were really going to take the plunge into obsessive that rating all my songs would require id need way more than five stars

what i REALLY wish itunes had was a tagging system a la netflix

"coked-out studio masterpieces from the 1970s"

code it yrself

kill yourself

(i use hazel to automatically add new tracks to that playlist). i don't like "smart" playlists because i don't feel in control.

does not compute

well, all it does is put downloaded files on an external HD then adds it to the "in rotation" playlist. it's just file management, there's no auto-judgement involved. jesus we should take this to the "digital media management" thread already

max!

what i REALLY wish itunes had was a tagging system a la netflix

if the search box in itunes actually searched through ID3 tags you could put whatever you wanted to in the comments field and then type in, like, "coked" and it would show up *bangs head against wall*

what is hazel exactly? i'm tired of having two itunes libraries, one big one on a HD and one smaller portable one on my laptop. can it help me

Maintaining two iTunes libraries sounds far more difficult than ticking checkboxes, just saying