Will Oldham/Palace/Bonnie Prince Billie: S&D

one of the things i like about his later work is how much better of a singer he is now, people don't really talk about that but he must've put some work into voice lessons or something along the line.

man gbx

i was just thinking about his cover of "the world's greatest" by r.kelly at that show and how awesome it was.

dude he went from being kinda terrible to being legitimately v v good.

that was teh second set! i only made the first :-/

also omar check your whatever

i liken his early singing talent's roughness is akin to something like Libba Cotton's, not sure how blasphemous that is or if I can get away with comparing 2 such talents to each other, but hey, no worries brah.

(ie, not terrible unless you listen exclusively to broadway musicals and autotuned paedo-pop)

i will not be lumped in with musical theater enthusiasts and poptimists, thank u v much

gonna DL these as soon as i get home, thx homes

more comin

ok mississippi, i just listened to the world's greatest again and it's awesome

With Dylan, you need an annotated bibliography. Scholars can hold annual symposiums on single verses.

cool thx dad

if anybody wd be cool enough to slip me an ILXmessage too I would dance with glee? but no worries if it's a chore

I was an die hard Oldham fan from the first 7" up through I See a Darkness. I had EVERYTHING SEVERAL THINGS. I don't know what happened but after I See a Darkness (which I thought was his best!), he just fell off my radar.

― scott pgwp (pgwp), Saturday, October 2, 2010 9:42 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

adjusted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCen9gOTmD4

aslo he sings on this, which is rad and of instructional value regarding bears (dangers of)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG2PL2zO034

I still think Superwolf is amazing, I feel like I listen to it far more than I See a Darkness.

I can't listen to I See a Darkness much nowadays, I know the layer of joeks is there but it's too close to home plus a bit dirgy imo, wd far rather play Ease On from that era.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmDbO4zgzvE

attn NV

thx :D

i really liked lie down in the light

superwolf might be my overall fav thing he's done

superwolf def has some of my all time favorite tracks on it, for sure

thx for sending those tunes over, gbx. no worries on the rest of it *`~unless you have a moment to spare someday~*

first palace bros singles/rarities comp (lost blues) works for me as his most solid work.

beck comparison is a good one

I think these two guys were at about the same point musically circa '93 and Beck may have even bit Oldham a bit.

also, have always admired how willing and able he is to continuously reformat and reimagine his old stuff. i've only seen him live twice (Walker last year, Boston...seven years ago?), but those shows and the live albums are seriously impressive imo. like, when i saw him in boston (@middle east), it was on the heels of Master And Everyone, so i went in expecting a pretty hushed affair. instead, he came out in eyeliner, and blazed thru the whole album, in order, front to back, wild and electric. lyrics and basic tunes aside, it was a complete transformation, and completely awesome. then he played old shit by request, all of it different from the 'originals.'

i honestly can't think of many other contemporary artists (instrumentalists aside) that play it so fast and loose with their stuff.

cf the lol strokes concert i went to a few months later which was mechanically faithful to the album. it was like someone hit shuffle on itunes.

and n/p omar, i'll see about getting the second set up later today.

gbx hook me up?

i honestly can't think of many other contemporary artists (instrumentalists aside) that play it so fast and loose with their stuff.

― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:03 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dylan is the only one i can think of

yeah, that's who i was thinking of, too. was trying, and failing, to think of anyone else.

Prince (live at least)

really? prince did pretty standard version, like a little more jammed out but still basically the song, the 2 times i saw him

i mean, last time i saw dylan it took me 2 verses to figure out he was doing "tangled up in blue" fer chrissakes

Neil Young, maybe?

actually the correct answer is prob any number of jazz artists

instrumentalists aside

I haven't seen Prince in 10 years but afaict usually he is really flippant/goofy with his old material, shoving everything into a medley, dropping verses/choruses, instrumentation is usually totally different, etc. - I guess yeah they are just more jammy. which is kinda required by the fact that most of his stuff was not recorded live with a band to begin with.

I bring him up because the end result doesn't really bear TOO much resemblance to the recorded versions, even tho they are still identifiable

i honestly can't think of many other contemporary artists (instrumentalists aside) that play it so fast and loose with their stuff.

like it or not, ever jam band ever (the Dead being the most obvious example)

if anybody wd be cool enough to slip me an ILXmessage too I would dance with glee? but no worries if it's a chore
me too!

got u tylerw

like it or not, ever jam band ever (the Dead being the most obvious example)

― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:30 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark

jamming doesn't count imo. stretching out and elaborating is one thing, but oldham takes whisper-soft strummy beardo songs and overhauls them into shreddy electro rave-ups. like, they are occasionally unrecognizable. also, at least from what i've heard, the Dead/whoever still hang all their improv on a basic song structure, like the head of a jazz tune, you know? each iteration of a tune might be completely different, and you may not recognize it if you walk in in the middle, but eventually they'll circle back.

i mean, Greatest Palace Music is sort of a singular artifact, as far as i can tell.

Boy, there's a caveat for everyone else, huh? Oh, right, except, umm, Bob Dylan.

w/e

and yeah, except for bob dylan, because he does the same thing. jam bands ~don't~. jazz dudes DO, but they're playing jazz, and that's sorta the point sometimes. but in the realm of rock and roll or w/e, i can't think of anyone that reinvents their back catalogue as frequently and as often as oldham.

i think with jam bands like the dead, it's about extending songs, exploring them in a more expansive manner, not necessarily really changing the actual skeleton of the song. with someone like dylan, he often really reimagines the songs. there was a version of girl from north country few years back that, to my ears, had a completely different chord structure than the original (sounded like friend of the devil, actually). don't know if oldham falls into this camp -- i'm not an obsessive fan, but it is pretty rare.

if the song is entirely re-structured, including chords, what makes it the same song? that the dude remembered to repeat a refrain every so often?

I mean, P-funk does that in their own peculiar jam-bandy way when they play live. They hit a groove and then George recites as many choruses from various songs as he can think of, for ex.