watched it Friday night, it was ok.
― da croupier, Monday, 23 July 2007 07:02 (sixteen years ago) link
there's a big ad at the beginning of the DVD about how the superduperfancypants director's cut 2cd bonanza will be out in 08.
― da croupier, Monday, 23 July 2007 07:05 (sixteen years ago) link
jonesing already
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 23 July 2007 09:29 (sixteen years ago) link
has he done anything else i should see?
If you haven't seen "You Can Count On Me," you need to. Ruffalo is amazing in it.
― Ben Boyerrr, Monday, 23 July 2007 09:38 (sixteen years ago) link
looking forward to giving this a second viewing tonight
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link
I enjoyed this film but I don't think I quite get why so many people think it is SO great.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link
well personally I found that after seeing it various elements of it kept coming back to me, and my associations with a lot of the locations in the film (SF, Lake Berryessa, Riverside, the Ontario airport) gave it some weird kind of resonance for me. I expect I'll have a more nuanced appraisal of it after seeing it again.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link
People getting their Kubrick on with the director of "Janie's Got A Gun"
― da croupier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link
I don't like acting much, usually. And Robert Downey Jr is the worst of them.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link
xpost
perhaps it underwhelms because, as this review maintains, the quality of the DVD transfer is "shameful"?
http://www.slantmagazine.com/dvd/dvd_review.asp?ID=1178
But it could just be that the style and execution is quite good, and the material utterly Old News.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link
(that's for adam)
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah I guess it is what I would call a great rainy afteroon movie, and certainly there aren't enough of those. But I have this feeling that it only stands out (for me) because everything elwe is so terrible!
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link
else
RD needs to show us a new, less prattly side soon.
Mark Ruffalo was using a reedy voice (not his usual one) that was reeeeallly familiar, but I can't figure out who he might have been imitating.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link
Haha I think it might have stood out for me because everything else by Fincher is so terrible!
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link
"terrible" = not like a million overrated gritty cop shows of the last 25 years
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link
lol well okay.
I read the (first/original) Graysmith book when I was a teenager, so I did sort of know how everything panned out beforehand. I may well have been more gripped if I knew less about the case.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link
I like gritty cop shows, Morbius! =)
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link
But seriously I thought it was just fantastic. Great acting, great mood, great pacing. I admit that maybe it might have resonated more with me because the case was such a part of the undercurrent of the Bay Area when I was growing up, but it's still probably the best movie I've seen this year.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link
Alex OTM
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link
Maybe this is why I like This Is England so much then! Not that it is set anywhere near where I am from or features people like those I grew up with, but it certainly draws from a larger culture that was all around me during my childhood.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link
Fincher decorates background walls with classic movie posters and includes a self-indicting, pre-opening credit visual clue (elucidated during the third act) that speaks to cinema's potent cultural impact,
wait what is this "clue" he's referring to here
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link
S: Donal Logue D: John Ennis
― da croupier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link
I don't like acting much, usually
What do you watch in movies -- costumes? wallpaper?
(although if you watch Jake Gylllie in this one you might hate acting too).
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link
i just watched this just now
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link
I don't know, a lot of "movie acting" has really got to me of late, basically the kind of acting you see in most studio films has suddenly begun to strike me as utterly ridiculous - that this is now how you now portray characters for a mainstream audience. I'm not just trying to be snobby about it (I hope) because there's lots of horrible acting in other types of movies.
Worst recent example I can think of - Little Children.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link
That movie was terrible though.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:48 (sixteen years ago) link
It was. Lots of things wrong with it. But the acting in it was (for me) kind of the final straw. Whenever I notice acting now it turns me right off.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link
Also if you though Robert Downey Jr was bad in this, don't see Fur! Actually don't see Fur period!
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link
hahaaaa! I have NO plans to see Fur in this lifetime.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link
I don't know that I think RDJ is "bad", I think he probably always succeeds at what he is trying to do. I just don't particularly want to buy what he is selling.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link
(unless he has some really good shit)
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link
On the other hand, I sort of like Mark Ruffalo despite his only-slightly-more-subtle but still ludicrously mannered performances.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link
And I know everyone thinks I am RONG and crazy anyway but just to show I'm not simply being contrarian - "acting" I have liked recently was definitely Daniel Auteil in Cache'. That was perfect, IMO. Almost invisible!
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link
RDJ quite fine here; the only perf in recent years I couldn't stand was in the Linklater cartoon.
If you like "realistic," no-nonsense, leaden acting, you couldn't get better than Anthony Edwards here.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah he was good. I didn't say LEADEN though, you did. =)
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link
And I don't just like "realistic" acting. I thought Laura Dern was amazing in Inland Empire, I liked Alec Baldwin in the Departed. It's a really fine line, I admit.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link
I couldn't stand Edwards, actually.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link
really? that's funny!
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link
I didn't have a problem with any of the actors actually. Inland Empire (Laura Dern's acting chops aside) was nearly unwatchable OTOH.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link
Of course part of the reaosn why I didn't, was it didn't matter was on screen cuz Fincher treated them like they were wallpaper anyway.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link
It's funny how quickly Zodiac's become Fincher Film #3 or #4 about which everyone will be evenly split on its merit.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link
Edwards did a fine reprise of Goose here.
x-post I don't think anti-Fincher people have the same animosity to this that they did with Fight Club and Seven, in part because "Hurdy Gurdy Man" aside he avoided his more obvious indulgences. It's not even ANTI-Fincher, just varying degrees of enthusiasm.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link
Really haunting film – I think of it as Rashomon for the CSI-watching pathology/forensic-obsessed generation.
Who the killer is the least of your problems, it's the inability to know anything to a certainty.
― Brakhage, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link
I was never a fan of Fincher until this film
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link
I really don't have much of an opinion either way about David Fincher and wasn't really hyper-aware of this being "a David Fincher film" while I was watching it.
― admrl, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link
D: John Ennis
Are you MAD?!?!
― Ben Boyerrr, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link
I was aware of him but didn't really care one way or the other - altho I actively disliked Fight Club and Se7en seemed like some sub-par Vertigo graphic novel type crap (you call that a "twist" ending? wtf)
also yeah I loved John Ennis' two scenes in this
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link
"It's funny how quickly Zodiac's become Fincher Film #3 or #4 about which everyone will be evenly split on its merit."
Hah but the funny thing is how many people who liked Zodiac HATED his other films!
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:35 (sixteen years ago) link
John Ennis was the 2nd handwriting expert, right?
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link