New Yorker magazine alert thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6071 of them)

Yes, that was ugh.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Friday, 14 January 2011 17:09 (thirteen years ago) link

i am considering writing a disappointed email, is how disappointed i am, right now

Lamp, Friday, 14 January 2011 17:09 (thirteen years ago) link

I know right! I couldn't even get through it.

I did enjoy the unintentional irony of describing what would commonly be thought of as "people skills" or "intuition" or "emotional intelligence" in ridiculously labored and aspergerian terms.

hey boys, suppers on me, our video just went bacterial (Hurting 2), Friday, 14 January 2011 17:14 (thirteen years ago) link

The psychoanalysis in China article is kind of disappointing imo, mostly because it seems to say that it'll explain why a) psychoanalysis fell out of a favor in the US and most other Western nations, and b) why China then picked it up. The article gets at b) at a certain superficial level, but really doesn't go into a) (which I'm sure has been the subject of a lot of other articles, just would've liked discussion here). Anyway, one of my prof is mentioned in the article, easily the best part of it.

― nomar little (Leee), Monday, January 10, 2011 7:21 PM Bookmark

Agree with this. Started to raise some interesting implications about what psychoanalysis could mean for China as well, but then wastes way too much ink on here-and-now descriptions of various conferences and meetings, which new yorker writers love to bore us with.

hey boys, suppers on me, our video just went bacterial (Hurting 2), Friday, 14 January 2011 17:17 (thirteen years ago) link

freud/china piece nakh http://pastie.org/1460821

caek, Friday, 14 January 2011 17:59 (thirteen years ago) link

The David Brooks article was so poor that I kept double checking to see if it was in fact fiction and supposed to be ironic. Or, failing that, if it was nonfiction and supposed to be a parody.

Virginia Plain, Friday, 14 January 2011 18:19 (thirteen years ago) link

I knew the Brooks article would settle the argument.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 14 January 2011 18:28 (thirteen years ago) link

I had trouble just imagining people named Harold and Erica being the same age.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Friday, 14 January 2011 18:30 (thirteen years ago) link

that article was not about people it was abt the Composure Class (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Empty Factoids)

Lamp, Friday, 14 January 2011 18:41 (thirteen years ago) link

omg that brooks article guys

horseshoe, Friday, 14 January 2011 22:39 (thirteen years ago) link

unacceptable

horseshoe, Friday, 14 January 2011 22:39 (thirteen years ago) link

i saw the name and sort of hoped it was a different david brooks and after about two sentences i was like DX

max, Friday, 14 January 2011 23:07 (thirteen years ago) link

Page 1 of 6?

forget it

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 14 January 2011 23:11 (thirteen years ago) link

Reading Jon Lee Anderson's recent article about Sri Lanka. I'm so curious what his personality is like, as far as how he behaves in a room with dictators and drug lords and everyone else he commiserates with as a reporter. (His article on Rio gangs from last year is terrific, too.)

like launch the globs and strands (Eazy), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:28 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm sure he tries really hard not to say anything offensive.

Mordy, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:31 (thirteen years ago) link

JL Anderson is great.

Le mépris vient de la tête, la haine vient du cœur (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:34 (thirteen years ago) link

That's the thing -- I'm just really curious about what his manners and body language are like when he's sitting with legitimately paranoid, genuine killers.

like launch the globs and strands (Eazy), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:34 (thirteen years ago) link

(His article on Rio gangs from last year is terrific, too.)

loved this^^. favorite thing I read last year aside from maybe the Sibera travelogue (or was that 09?)

gr8080, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:36 (thirteen years ago) link

International subscriber so always about a week behind. That Brooks piece was such a bore, and added up to nothing as far as I could tell. Seemed like the editors took the day off when that made it onto the page.

The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:03 (thirteen years ago) link

I would like to add my ire about the piece of shit that was that Brooks thing.

quincie, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:09 (thirteen years ago) link

All the action's over on the Brooks thread, it seems. Cloudberry!

The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:55 (thirteen years ago) link

New Yorker evidently messed up the John Lurie article. Have a look at the blog:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2010/08/video-john-lurie-the-drawing-show.html

katharine, Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:10 (thirteen years ago) link

Well, clearly Lurie's close friends and supporters didn't like it!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:17 (thirteen years ago) link

I got one par into the David Brooks article before I flipped to the Sri Lanka one.

Anyway, Jill Lepore on constitutional "originalism" is must-read: http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2011/01/17/110117crat_atlarge_lepore

Fairport Dinkum Convention (Leee), Saturday, 22 January 2011 19:37 (thirteen years ago) link

just got her book, whites of their eyes.

dan selzer, Sunday, 23 January 2011 05:40 (thirteen years ago) link

Dan, have you read the Lepore book yet? What do you think?

Another great one:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/01/24/110124fa_fact_gawande

I've only read three of Atul Gawande's pieces, but they are all so uniformly excellent. Does he ever write anything not worth reading?

Cobra Laser-Face (Leee), Saturday, 29 January 2011 21:50 (thirteen years ago) link

Haven't read it. Have a backlog of books I'll never read from the holidays.

The Gawande articles are getting so much attention. This last one is getting picked up on all the political/progressive blogs as well general interest blogs.

dan selzer, Sunday, 30 January 2011 00:07 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah atul's stuff is regularly great

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 30 January 2011 21:24 (thirteen years ago) link

if you are a(n american) sports fan, it's def worth reading ben mcgrath on concussions in football

mookieproof, Sunday, 30 January 2011 22:21 (thirteen years ago) link

gawande article on health care is so good, so inspiring in content and as journalism. wow

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 31 January 2011 03:05 (thirteen years ago) link

Definitely, that Gawande article was fantastic. I'm playing catch up on the last few issues and just read that one last night.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 31 January 2011 03:07 (thirteen years ago) link

btw http://gawande.com/

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Monday, 31 January 2011 03:36 (thirteen years ago) link

he is awesome

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 31 January 2011 03:42 (thirteen years ago) link

if you are a(n american) sports fan, it's def worth reading ben mcgrath on concussions in football

― mookieproof, Sunday, January 30, 2011 12:21 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark

this one from 2009 is a great read too: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/19/091019fa_fact_gladwell

gr8080, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:11 (thirteen years ago) link

finally got my copy of the Jan 10 issue (i run about 3 weeks behind cover dates, being in the middle of the ocean and all. i'll see them on the news stand before my mailbox)

the freud in china thing was awesome but the story about banana scientists and the story about the sadaam statue were even better. gr8 issue

gr8080, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:18 (thirteen years ago) link

i always run about a month and a half late on the mag.

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:21 (thirteen years ago) link

I used to be great at keeping totally up to date, but lately I've been reading a bunch of random books I got over the holidays so I'm losing my place.

dan selzer, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:33 (thirteen years ago) link

oh i'm basically a year behind on reading.

i just mean when they actually arrive in my mailbox.

gr8080, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:37 (thirteen years ago) link

is the new yorker better than the NYRB or LRB?

smanghetti bollocknaked (cozen), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:43 (thirteen years ago) link

woof!

US: 1 year (47 issues) of The New Yorker for $39.95
UK: 47 issues (one year) for $120

smanghetti bollocknaked (cozen), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:45 (thirteen years ago) link

$40 is insane value

smanghetti bollocknaked (cozen), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:46 (thirteen years ago) link

NYer is great for original reportage, but the criticism pales next to NY- or LRB

x-ps

C0L1N B..., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:47 (thirteen years ago) link

it's a totally different kind of thing to either. not really a ranking decision if you want to subscribe to one.

caek, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:47 (thirteen years ago) link

lrb is £12 per year in the uk, but it's monthly.

caek, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:48 (thirteen years ago) link

ta

thought the LRB was fortnightly, tho it might've changed since my sub lapsed

smanghetti bollocknaked (cozen), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:50 (thirteen years ago) link

oh you are right, it is fortnightly. £12 is for six months.

i get nyrb, which is $109 for european addresses. if you want a mag with short fiction or plenty of up to date criticism of stuff other than academic books and literary fiction then it is not for you. i just like it's very slow style.

caek, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

its

caek, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

i got my first 2 years of NYer for $25/year /braggin

gr8080, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:28 (thirteen years ago) link

My mother pays for mine!

dan selzer, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:43 (thirteen years ago) link

lol my subscription was also a gift from my mother

Lamp, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 00:19 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.