future of ~the internet~

tbh I read it first thing in the morning while on the toilet

good to know, thanks

i sleep w/my iphone inside of my butt <<twitter style joke lol

like people who say v strange abstract things that structurally look like jokes but dont really make any sense - also it made me realize thats kinda what my tweets look like :/

― ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 February 2011 19:13 (2 hours ago) Bookmark

i was gonna say

Only reason I am even on twitter is due to a couple people I know who basically dont use anything else, and their tweets are locked, so its that or I never hear from them. Which is ridiculous of course.

well plz present some rationale for the entire up until this point internet narrative of creative destruction and inovation to turn 180 to a static corporate controlled futurescape - something better than 'people seem to like mobile apps' and 'google results are not the best' - i mean you know corporate interests wouldve loved to control this thing from the beginning - instead we got the unraveling of the music, print, and advertising worlds and the rise of huge new technology companies more interested in facilitating peoples internet experience than controlling the content of it

― ice cr?m, Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:01 AM (22 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i've read your post several times and i still don't know what the fuck you're trying to say. hence. dick.

for 'corporate controlled futurescape' read 'the espn iphone app'

future of internet:
streaming video overtakes everything, taking up a shitload of bandwidth and eventually crushing cable and satellite television
marauding groups like Anonymous continue to menace society

i'm so scared

well plz present some rationale for the entire up until this point internet narrative of creative destruction and inovation to turn 180 to a static corporate controlled futurescape - something better than 'people seem to like mobile apps' and 'google results are not the best' - i mean you know corporate interests wouldve loved to control this thing from the beginning - instead we got the unraveling of the music, print, and advertising worlds and the rise of huge new technology companies more interested in facilitating peoples internet experience than controlling the content of it
― ice cr?m, Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:01 AM (22 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i've read your post several times and i still don't know what the fuck you're trying to say. hence. dick.

― utterfilth (whatever), Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:11 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

just means im advanced, from the future

fyi on the radio just now a guy just said

if i'm trying to figure out how to beat apple i want to build a faster machine with even more apps and maybe at a lower price. that's the future.

^^^ real insights

lol

basically i dont see how the history of the internet up till now which has been 'liberating content' switches to 'locking down content' is all - at least present a plausible narrative where users would be cool w/giving up their freedom/free stuff

if i'm trying to figure out how to beat apple i want to build a faster machine with even more apps and maybe at a lower price. that's the future.

― HOOStory is back. Fasten your steenbelts. (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:20 PM (58 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lmao its funny cause its quite literally 'the past'

just means im advanced, from the future

― ice cr?m, Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:18 PM (35 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ok, prove it. surprise us all.

^^^ doesn't follow ice cr?m on twitter

doesn't do twitter

or should i?

anyway i posted a condensed version of my argument a few posts back - i apologize for being incomprehensible - that bothers me too - like i was literally complaining to myself abt tombots posts being willfully cryptic while i wrote that lol

it must be an age thing, i'm out

future of the internet - ppl still bitching at each other.

It's a senior thing - you wouldn't understand

i look forward to the day where i can outright murder someone over the internet and order a pizza w/one click

I don't like murder, i'm out

hold on ok, this should just take 5 mins

fuck off

dude what

wtf

hey i apologise if i've got in the way of some useful discussion on this thread.

you have been kinda inexplicably hostile

A: http://futureoftheinternet.org/

sputtering
on a path to a lockdown
unsettling new kinds of control
“tethered appliances”
holocaust tattoos
Google mash-ups
made up word is at risk
the Borg
lost opportunity
netizens

you're welcome

also
http://www.bruceeisner.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/08/26/future_internet.jpg

thats me right now

you've shaved

future shave

lol @ future of the internet book exposing the view im arguing against, no respect

i did notice that but it sounds like it is prob a terrible POS so you are still on solid ground. also, the guy's name is Zit Train and he draws attention to it by having his name on railway tracks. someone at his vanity publisher obv hates him.

hahahahaha

I'd say that the idea of devices being "locked-in" -- which is complete bullshit because we're more cloud/web app dependent now than ever -- isn't all that important in the long term. If anything, the breadth of devices available now is ridiculous. Instead of having one device that is easily modified and expanded (PC), we have computers in everything and they're all able to futz around with data and communication in different modes.

http://searchengineland.com/google-forecloses-on-content-farms-with-farmer-algorithm-update-66071

I am doing this twitter thing, who's with me

future of ~the internet~ depends on it

whats ur handle

handsofthedevil

Following u. You'd better be good so that the two times I month I actually remember to check it aren't big disappointments. Don't let me down here E3.

yah youre in the spotlight, on deck circle, got my eyes on you

PRESSURE

dag yo

basically i dont see how the history of the internet up till now which has been 'liberating content' switches to 'locking down content' is all - at least present a plausible narrative where users would be cool w/giving up their freedom/free stuff

app stores are cool, the OS provider is the ultimate middleman/arbiter of content, generally speaking people seem more than happy to hand over the keys? This is the trend I see.

I like your point about liberation vs control. I think both have been pretty strong drivers for internet activity - if there wasn't some temporarily satisfying illusion or promise of control then the degree of investment we have today probably wouldn't have happened. On second thought compared to my first argument above, there are pretty strong points to be made for the pendulum trending in either direction at the moment - apps/hulu on the one hand, wikileaks/anonymous on the other.

I personally have worries about increasing segregation between phone ppl and freebsd ppl but frankly that is the kind of concern only I have, and the truth is those two demographics are closer to one another in how they use computers today than they ever have been.

Maybe if people start making more apps that make it easier to set up and manage your own cloudiddy content/service that's not necessarily tied to somebody else's branded packaging and distribution scheme (not that there aren't a few already, I guess) I'll be pretty convinced. Maybe I'll see if I can put a tumblr authorin' app on grandma's ipad and fool around with it.

sort of an update: all the twitter/tumblr apps for iOS devices seem just designed for one-way blathering and seemed really poorly suited for content liberation theology