"Aw. Thanks nath. :)"
No way, dude, thank YOU. :-) How's it going anyway? Even though I'm online all the time - thanks to my iphone - I can't seem to get in touch with y'alls. :-)
― stevienixed, Sunday, 14 September 2008 12:53 (fifteen years ago) link
might be worth noting that when I tried to vote while logged out I got an "Error Has Occurred, Try Again Shortly" message.
anything other than old.css looks horrible and wrong to me.
― sleeve, Sunday, 14 September 2008 17:41 (fifteen years ago) link
old.css
I like serifs.
― Radiant Flowering Crab (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 14 September 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link
old.css!!!!!
― genital grinder (roxymuzak), Sunday, 14 September 2008 17:58 (fifteen years ago) link
I'm using Standard Stylesheet for the time being. Several of them hurt my eyes, particularly the IBM one.
― chap, Sunday, 14 September 2008 19:07 (fifteen years ago) link
old.css, but keith.css looks pretty readable
― gabbneb, Sunday, 14 September 2008 19:11 (fifteen years ago) link
keith.css, easy. With the upgrade, I went thru and tested all the stylesheets just to remind myself and see what was new, and keith.css is still the most readable: Posts are differentiated by non-obnoxiously colored boxes, margins are healthy (I can't believe how many of the ILX stylesheet makers just don't get this), and the alignment is reasonable. It's not innovative or anything, but that's not really the point.
What could be improved: post divs should be white, so's to best blend with random pic pastes.
― ==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Sunday, 14 September 2008 19:37 (fifteen years ago) link
blueski remains my favorite
― Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 19:46 (fifteen years ago) link
Someone should tell blueski about margins.
― ==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Sunday, 14 September 2008 19:57 (fifteen years ago) link
black.css easily wins the absolutely unreadable award, tho.
― ==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Sunday, 14 September 2008 19:59 (fifteen years ago) link
i really like what blueski looks like, but it gets all garbled on my machine
― sauce boss (roxymuzak), Sunday, 14 September 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link
grinding genitals into sauce, boss
― ==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Sunday, 14 September 2008 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link
sheesh
― genital grinder (roxymuzak), Sunday, 14 September 2008 20:59 (fifteen years ago) link
Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.
― System, Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:01 (fifteen years ago) link
I presume about 90 percent of the old.css votes are sheer nostalgia.
― Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:02 (fifteen years ago) link
If by "90" you mean "1", then yes.
― caek, Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:10 (fifteen years ago) link
style-monochrome.css: Standard Stylesheet in monochrome
― cozen (cozwn), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:12 (fifteen years ago) link
I'll cop to choosing blueski if for no other reason than all the other stylesheets' fonts are too big.
― Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:14 (fifteen years ago) link
I like only having to hit page down once on the New Answers page.
― Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:16 (fifteen years ago) link
press ctrl-minus
― ›̊-‸‷̅‸-- (ledge), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:18 (fifteen years ago) link
No, blueski.css will do fine, thx.
― Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link
kenan's font is small too
― genital grinder (roxymuzak), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:33 (fifteen years ago) link
I wish keith.css didn't use Verdana, but otherwise that get's my vote now.
― Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:34 (fifteen years ago) link
God, I hate Verdana. I should stop typing.
The problem with the fact that you can count on only about 10 fonts existing on all computers is that they're all pretty well shopworn by now. E.g., there are (to my knowledge) 4 sans-serif fonts you can count on being available to any graphical web-display device:
― ==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:57 (fifteen years ago) link
TNR is shit on screens anyway.
― You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:59 (fifteen years ago) link
― -- (stet), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:01 (fifteen years ago) link
I seem to recall that the next version of Firefox will contain dynamic font technology. (Does anyone remember Truedoc?) I suppose that might shake up the snowglobe a bit.
― ==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:04 (fifteen years ago) link
xp to libcrypt. Sure, I realize all too well that typographical options on the web are limited, Times sucks, Verdana is a screen font, the Typography unit at Microsoft is surprisingly sophisticated and well-funded for a company with such poor corporate taste, Eric Gill slept with his daughter and his dog, etc., etc., but I still hate Verdana.
― Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:06 (fifteen years ago) link
xp, there's an IE version too: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/07/21/font-embedding-on-the-web.aspx
― Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:09 (fifteen years ago) link
I love Verdana but it is growing a bit tired.
― You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:11 (fifteen years ago) link
Does old.css's win tell us something about some vague inherent conservatism or fear/dislike of change? Or is it simply the most useable/readable one of the bunch? Do new members also pick old.css when they experiment with their preferences?
― StanM, Monday, 15 September 2008 07:03 (fifteen years ago) link
I expected the default one would win.
― StanM, Monday, 15 September 2008 07:05 (fifteen years ago) link
Actually, black Times against a white background doesn't exactly scream out to the rest of the office that you're posting to message boards all day. It could be a Word document for all they know.
(xpost)
― sensual harrassment (naus), Monday, 15 September 2008 07:12 (fifteen years ago) link
old.css is great because it's simpler and wittier.
― You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 15 September 2008 07:55 (fifteen years ago) link
do this poll again after my new one drops, it could get DOUBLE the votes
― Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Monday, 15 September 2008 10:11 (fifteen years ago) link
which thread was the list of css classes on?
― ›̊-‸‷̅‸-- (ledge), Monday, 15 September 2008 10:18 (fifteen years ago) link
Boards page, ILX Styles link near the bottom.
― You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 15 September 2008 10:24 (fifteen years ago) link
coming soon: caek.css
― Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:10 (fifteen years ago) link
Will caek.css drop SCIENCE on us? Coz ifso, that's the one I'm going for. (Though I want assurances it will not generate tiny black holes in my operating system.)
― The Lesser of Two Weevils (Masonic Boom), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:23 (fifteen years ago) link
the background image will be the hubble deep field and all text will be at 6x10^-36 pt.
― Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:35 (fifteen years ago) link
Yesss!!!!
(Can all posts by killfiled members be shown being sucked into supermassive black hole at centre of galaxy, please?)
― The Lesser of Two Weevils (Masonic Boom), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:37 (fifteen years ago) link
I would like to add my vote for Kenan's style sheet although I missed this actual poll. It's so sleek and minimalist. Brings a level of class to Ilx I didn't think possible.
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Monday, 15 September 2008 13:18 (fifteen years ago) link
Thank you, though I can't take credit for the minimalist part. That's pretty much enforced by the html, and rightly so.
― so glitchy (kenan), Monday, 15 September 2008 13:44 (fifteen years ago) link
old.css should be the default - its ilx's trademark
― update prefs (ice crӕm), Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:44 PM (5 days ago)
― (´・ω・)つ(・(・ (am0n), Monday, 15 September 2008 14:45 (fifteen years ago) link
Yeah making old.css the default seems sensible.
― Matt DC, Monday, 15 September 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link
it's really really easy to change it tho... i wonder if noobs would naturally drift to old.css. it might be worth keeping the default as is for some sort of experiment there (ymmv re worth of course)
― Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Monday, 15 September 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link
Um, what just happened?
― jaymc, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link
new blueski.css is available now, rewritten for the new code
― Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:22 (fifteen years ago) link
I guess that's what happened. I'm not sure how I feel about it.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:28 (fifteen years ago) link
which one do you mean? (the label)
― stet, Friday, 13 December 2019 16:53 (four years ago) link
black.css for life!!
― brimstead, Friday, 13 December 2019 21:19 (four years ago) link
I switched over to standard-dark a while back and it's been a good change, very easy to read.
My only gripe is with reading quote blocks on my phone. It formats them extremely narrow, so you only get a couple words per line.
― Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Saturday, 14 December 2019 05:31 (four years ago) link
Aww, crap. It looks like naus.css is broken because imageshack.us sold out. Any chance I could host that penguin .gif on the ilxor servers and amend the css to preserve that Aja/Dante legacy forever? It's not like anybody's ever going to use it.
― john shopkins (naus), Saturday, 14 December 2019 07:59 (four years ago) link
Yeah - send it to stet @ ilxor dot com pls!
― stet, Saturday, 14 December 2019 14:15 (four years ago) link