US POLITICS SPRING 2011: Let's just call off this country.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5938 of them)

^^^What the fucking fuck?

The hoppiest hop hopper now with xtra hops (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:10 (thirteen years ago) link

So funny i had to read a Walt Whitman quote to see that article.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:11 (thirteen years ago) link

I didn't know I could loathe him any more than I did.

Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:14 (thirteen years ago) link

gay partners showing up at a hospital is a huge budgetary problem apparently

goole, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:14 (thirteen years ago) link

hey, same sex life partners "violates the state constitution."

smgdh

same sex life partners visiting each other in the hospital "violates the state constitution."

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/121956273.html

goole, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:18 (thirteen years ago) link

it's not just the hospital issue, it's a WI state register for same-sex couples, giving them some kind of less-than-marriage privileges, which walker and the AG don't want to defend anymore in court

Wisconsin Family Action sued last year in Dane County circuit court, arguing that the registries violated a 2006 amendment to the state constitution that bans gay marriage and any arrangement that is substantially similar.

goole, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:20 (thirteen years ago) link

really tho, is there any good reason that this dude should have

Wall Street and high gas prices. A theory:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/13/114190/speculation-explains-more-about.html
--curmudgeon

this is a joke of an article btw - it's built on a misleading quote about stable demand (*due to high prices*). the only mention of china comes from the bad guys.

iatee, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:22 (thirteen years ago) link

err ignore the first line of above post

iatee, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:23 (thirteen years ago) link

whipping on the guy who repealed don't ask don't tell when the opposition is scott walker

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:50 (thirteen years ago) link

“The literati sent out their minions to do their bidding,” Tyler wrote. “Washington cannot tolerate threats from outsiders who might disrupt their comfortable world. The firefight started when the cowardly sensed weakness. They fired timidly at first, then the sheep not wanting to be dropped from the establishment’s cocktail party invite list unloaded their entire clip, firing without taking aim their distortions and falsehoods. Now they are left exposed by their bylines and handles. But surely they had killed him off. This is the way it always worked. A lesser person could not have survived the first few minutes of the onslaught. But out of the billowing smoke and dust of tweets and trivia emerged Gingrich, once again ready to lead those who won’t be intimated by the political elite and are ready to take on the challenges America faces.”

goole, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:39 (thirteen years ago) link

^^^ Don't know whether to laugh, cry, or shit a brick over that excrable piece of ur-Hollywood badness.

Aimless, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:43 (thirteen years ago) link

don't be intimated, guys!

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:44 (thirteen years ago) link

It sounds like a bad poem that hasn't yet been broken down e.e. cummings style.

polyphonic, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:45 (thirteen years ago) link

the firefight
s t a r t e d
w
h
e
n

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:46 (thirteen years ago) link

Hah yes. Who is this Gingrich guy? He must be a true Washington outside, as I've never heard of him in the news for the past 20 or so years.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:54 (thirteen years ago) link

out of the billowing smoke

Kinda sums up the source of that post.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:56 (thirteen years ago) link

With a history of accusations of misogynistic behavior from both the left, MSNBC “Hardball” host Chris Matthews is not showing any indications that he’s willing to tread carefully, especially when it comes to discussing conservative women.

written by Jeff Poor (as in "poor grasp of English grammar")

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:59 (thirteen years ago) link

maybe he meant both people on the left

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 20:00 (thirteen years ago) link

so then which out of Morbs, k3v and aero is a sock

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 20:01 (thirteen years ago) link

So funny i had to read a Walt Whitman quote to see that article.

― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, May 18, 2011 5:11 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I didn't know I could loathe him any more than I did.

― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, May 18, 2011 5:14 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

lol

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 20:13 (thirteen years ago) link

a small miracle

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 23:46 (thirteen years ago) link

nothing ever passsing is the best-case scenario for this Senate

the gay bloggers are onto the faggot tweets (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 May 2011 01:50 (thirteen years ago) link

goodwin liu, down in flames

goole, Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:29 (thirteen years ago) link

didn't we talk about that yesterday

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:30 (thirteen years ago) link

well the vote just happened, to make it official

ben nelson and maine ladies voted no. orrin hatch voted 'present', wonder what that's about.

goole, Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:31 (thirteen years ago) link

It's about Nelson being a dirty asshole.

ginny thomas and tonic (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:37 (thirteen years ago) link

and here's Huckleberry Graham:

“When Mr. Liu came to the Judiciary Committee and said that, basically, Judge Alito’s philosophy judicially takes us back to the Jim Crow Era, that to me showed an ideological superiority or disdain for conservative ideology that made him in my view an ideologue,” Graham told reporters off the Senate floor.

ginny thomas and tonic (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:38 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah they're going with the "he was mean to alito" line. heaven fucking forfend.

goole, Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:39 (thirteen years ago) link

sorry, my post was in reference to Shakey's link, not Liu

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:40 (thirteen years ago) link

your post still works i think!

goole, Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:41 (thirteen years ago) link

god damnit

trade ilxor for whiney? (k3vin k.), Thursday, 19 May 2011 20:19 (thirteen years ago) link

uh have we talked about this somewhere already

the 1967 borders thing is o_0! I don't think there's a chance in hell Israel will ever go for it, but still.

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 May 2011 20:28 (thirteen years ago) link

Republicans are outraged that Obama would suggest that Israel go back to the 1967 borders. But they're always mad at Obama anyway.
NY Times says Netanyahu is willing now to give up more of the West Bank than he's ever offered but not go back to '67 borders

curmudgeon, Thursday, 19 May 2011 21:59 (thirteen years ago) link

Republicans outraged about Obama, following in the footsteps of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, suggesting Israel return to its '67 borders

ginny thomas and tonic (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:11 (thirteen years ago) link

In many ways this is the sort of hard negotiation Obama is notorious for avoiding: demand the sun but (maybe?) settle for the moon.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:12 (thirteen years ago) link

bibi has been giving us the finger since whenever, right back at ya man.

the entire premise of your tweet is incorrect (Hunt3r), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:30 (thirteen years ago) link

that's meant as U.S. not like "us."

the entire premise of your tweet is incorrect (Hunt3r), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:31 (thirteen years ago) link

following in the footsteps of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton

Ummm I don't think this is true...?

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:44 (thirteen years ago) link

NYT: the first time an American president has explicitly taken that position

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:44 (thirteen years ago) link

The main bone of contention among the potential candidates and Obama's speech seems to be the president's call for the Israeli government and Palestinian leaders to end their strife in deal that would divide the two groups along 1967 borders - a position held, it should be noted, by the previous administrations of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

ginny thomas and tonic (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:47 (thirteen years ago) link

fact checker!

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

where is that quote from

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

Woops, sorry.

ginny thomas and tonic (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:56 (thirteen years ago) link

If my memory is correct, Bush talked from both sides of his mouth: assuring the Israelis they could keep their settlements while pleading them to consider the '67 borders again. I don't remember the Barak-Clinton-Arafat deal.

ginny thomas and tonic (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:58 (thirteen years ago) link

so um, not that I disbelieve you or anything, but unless ctl-F on my browser is broken that quote appears nowhere in that linked article...?

(there's a comment referencing an Atlantic blog post that talks about this but that doesn't contain the quote either)

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Thursday, 19 May 2011 22:59 (thirteen years ago) link

^_^

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Thursday, 19 May 2011 23:02 (thirteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.