I HATE APPLE

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10236 of them)

16pt fonts are big but at least you can change that. massive line spacing like this _impairs_ readability and wastes space. and you can't change it.

the scrollbars and scroll behaviour are pretty much indefensible.

caek, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:17 (twelve years ago) link

if newsfire works for you then it's probably fine, but the developer is kind of a legendary weirdo asshole

i know, right? you can't delete the "david watanabe products newsfeed" on newsfire!!

still, i keep buying his stuff (see also: xtorrent)

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:23 (twelve years ago) link

ok, it's not reeder's fault: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/10/21/apple_leaks_new_scroll_bar_ui_details_in_mac_os_x_10_7_lion.html

just wow.

caek, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:32 (twelve years ago) link

Reeder doesn't use the system implementation, so it's probably more glitchy than the upcoming Lion one, but you are correct: the whole OS is getting those.

mh, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:37 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah, that's what I was saying. Lot of old-school people going to hate Lion at first, I think. It even changes the direction of two-finger scroll to match iOS.

stet, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:39 (twelve years ago) link

OK, that will drive me nuts.

mh, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:40 (twelve years ago) link

i don't mind if they get rid of scrollbars, since most people haven't clicked them for years, but they need to be replaced with something show the user where they are in a document. not having that information presented appropriately is one of the big problems people have with magazine and book reading apps. and apparently now i have to scroll around in the document to make the scrollbar appear so that i can find out where i was before i scrolled around? and this is all so i can get an extra 20px on my 1500px wide display?

caek, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:45 (twelve years ago) link

not feeling that at all

Euler, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:46 (twelve years ago) link

getting rid of them on iphone makes sense because you rarely work with long documents on a phone, and in any case, horizontal space is so valuable that its worth the lost information.

caek, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:47 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah, that's what I was saying. Lot of old-school people going to hate Lion at first, I think. It even changes the direction of two-finger scroll to match iOS.

99% sure there's an option to flip it back, but they'll probably just remove it in 10.8.

I've not used the new scrolling yet but I think it'll feel intuitive pretty quickly.

We are Real solid sex doll AKA RSSD (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 13 June 2011 21:49 (twelve years ago) link

how will you intuit where you are in a document?

caek, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:49 (twelve years ago) link

lol

markers, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:51 (twelve years ago) link

i feel like AA on a checkboxes tip here, but this is so, so stupid. if they want to put in some useless feature like the zooming dock thing that looks pretty and makes people go woooo in an apple store then that's fine. but this is bullshit.

caek, Monday, 13 June 2011 21:53 (twelve years ago) link

I agree that removing the scrollbar is mentalist btw

We are Real solid sex doll AKA RSSD (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 13 June 2011 21:54 (twelve years ago) link

I never really pay attention to where I am on the page until I'm scrolling, so I don't know yet if I'll be annoyed at having to do so. I can see it being more annoying on a mouse with an actually wheel, but the two-fingers-on-trackpad gesture is ok.

mh, Tuesday, 14 June 2011 02:22 (twelve years ago) link

dont knock it til u try it

(eval ' (diamonddave85), Tuesday, 14 June 2011 02:25 (twelve years ago) link

Reckon the Apple menu will be gone by 10.9, and it'll be hilarious.

James Mitchell, Tuesday, 14 June 2011 06:44 (twelve years ago) link

you can turn the scrollbars back on, i've just seen, but I haven't because it turns out I don't care. They flash when a document arrives or when you scroll, so I pretty much always know how where I am.

stet, Tuesday, 14 June 2011 12:39 (twelve years ago) link

scroll bar is excellent for letting you know how much clusterfuck is left in clusterfuck threads

british sb power (dayo), Tuesday, 14 June 2011 12:44 (twelve years ago) link

otm

markers, Tuesday, 14 June 2011 19:13 (twelve years ago) link

THOU SHALLT HAVE NO FILE SYSTEM DICK!

coffeetripperspillerslyricmakeruppers (Latham Green), Tuesday, 14 June 2011 20:22 (twelve years ago) link

Wireless is fucked on my mbp, evidently due to a s/w haemorrhage. Trying to get web help on wireless issues is always the worst but apparently reinstalling the whole twatting os fixes it

We are Real solid sex doll AKA RSSD (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 15 June 2011 20:39 (twelve years ago) link

Often it's enough to delete the relevant networking/AirPort preference files in your Library folder. Give it a try.

Millsner, Thursday, 16 June 2011 06:05 (twelve years ago) link

Ooh I will, thanks heaps.

Have so far tried deleting the wireless network from the network settings *and* the keychain. That improved things a bit (in that the network no longer vanishes) but it's intermittently slow as hell.

I also tried booting from the SL disc (but you can't open a browser to test the network) and a Ubuntu 11.04 Live CD (but Firefox would only stay open for 5-10 seconds before crashing).

Last thing I tried this morning was to repair permissions. It found a load of busted permissions to do with Airport files but I had to go to work and couldn't reboot to see whether it had done anything.

Autumn Alma Park Toilets (Schlafsack), Thursday, 16 June 2011 06:09 (twelve years ago) link

what if you don't use google reader?

You might want to check out NetNewsWire Lite 4. It's the complete ground-up rewrite of NNW that's promised for the regular version of NNW.

Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Thursday, 16 June 2011 07:01 (twelve years ago) link

Often it's enough to delete the relevant networking/AirPort preference files in your Library folder. Give it a try.

― Millsner, Thursday, 16 June 2011 16:05 (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I did this (and rebooted obv) and it already feels normal again. Too soon to get excited but I'll give it a couple of days.

We are Real solid sex doll AKA RSSD (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 16 June 2011 11:09 (twelve years ago) link

http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2011/06/loc.jpg

british sb power (dayo), Thursday, 16 June 2011 11:15 (twelve years ago) link

Sam I Am has a pain in her gulliver

We are Real solid sex doll AKA RSSD (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 16 June 2011 11:20 (twelve years ago) link

the latest update to DP4 has made my computer unable to interpret ctrl+a wtfff

laughing stalk (diamonddave85), Thursday, 16 June 2011 22:54 (twelve years ago) link

u dont know what u got til its gone

laughing stalk (diamonddave85), Thursday, 16 June 2011 22:54 (twelve years ago) link

What's up with that story first reported in the UK, that Apple is working on ways to block use of the camera with infrared inhibitor rays? Sounds ridiculous, but here it is via Pitchfork:

"The Golden Era of browsing shaky YouTube footage of last night's big show may be drawing to a close. Soon, you may be able to actually go to a concert without seeing the band reflected in the glow of at least 10 iPhone cameras around you. According to the British newspaper The Daily Mail, via the Times, Apple has filed a patent application for a technology that will block iPhone cameras from recording live events, and they're apparently going to sci-fi lengths to make it happen.

According to The Daily Mail, this technology will involve infrared sensors placed around venues. If you hold your phone up, those sensors will detect and disable your camera while allowing all the other applications on your phone to continue working. Apple reportedly filed the patent application 18 months ago in California. The Daily Mail reports that Apple is supposedly doing this to placate broadcasters and record companies upset that their intellectual property is making it out into the world in unlicensed, shakily-filmed form. It would also allow Apple the option of charging users to film events."

I can only imagine if this went through what could possibly go on down the road, not least, say, governments blocking use of cameras, etc. with the same technology. Also, dunno if this would block non-Apple phones. Also also, don't know if Apple would actually be so insane it'd implement this, patent or no.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 20 June 2011 12:21 (twelve years ago) link

Don't see them ever doing this for music concerts etc; it's too dumb. I wondered if it was either a protective patent to stop anyone else getting there first, or was to do with the govt/mil installations that won't allow any devices with cameras on the premises. This way they can sell them the infrared emitters and not have to make a camera-less iPhone.

stet, Monday, 20 June 2011 12:32 (twelve years ago) link

yeah what venue would even bother?

sonderangerbot, Monday, 20 June 2011 12:39 (twelve years ago) link

some hooligans are gonna figure out the infrared code and sell DIY kits though

british sb power (dayo), Monday, 20 June 2011 12:42 (twelve years ago) link

Lots of venues would bother I bet. I saw Beady Eye over the weekend, and while security obviously could not stop most folks, they made a point of asking people to stop making movies. Anyway, plenty of venues have no taping rules, and the better quality these phones get, the more they're going to want to figure out how to enforce their policies.

It would still be a terrible idea. This sort of disrupter ray makes more sense applied in locker rooms and places like that.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 20 June 2011 12:50 (twelve years ago) link

a lot is being made out of a patent application here

ice cr?m, Monday, 20 June 2011 17:05 (twelve years ago) link

Any other video editors on here? Has anyone gotten a chance to check out FCPX? I've read good stuff and bad stuff and it seems to me that once they fix some backwards compatibility issues most of those complaints should go away.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 26 June 2011 14:48 (twelve years ago) link

Apple are adamant they aren't going to do backward compatibility. See David pogue's blog post yesterday

http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/professional-video-editors-weigh-in-on-final-cut-pro-x/

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 26 June 2011 15:33 (twelve years ago) link

haha apple is really feelin itself right now

ice cr?m, Sunday, 26 June 2011 15:35 (twelve years ago) link

is there ANY way to make the ipad2 cameras better? a tricky app of some sort??

Serial Chiller (sunny successor), Sunday, 3 July 2011 20:48 (twelve years ago) link

iCal and Address Book are the ugliest pieces of shit yet. It's the new brushed metal, this faux-real stuff.

stet, Friday, 8 July 2011 20:56 (twelve years ago) link

mac-os-x-lion-this-is-not-the-future-we-were-hoping-for

but these multitouch gestures are!

laughing stalk (diamonddave85), Friday, 8 July 2011 22:43 (twelve years ago) link

that article doesn't make me to compelled to change my OS; when I consider that I'm about 80% happy with the current one. we'll see.

akm, Friday, 8 July 2011 22:45 (twelve years ago) link

That's it exactly. I ended up at OS X because the alternatives were pissing me off.

Gary Barlow syndrome (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 8 July 2011 22:47 (twelve years ago) link

That new iCal / Address Book styling reminds me of those Cinermaware games on the Amiga.

Chewshabadoo, Friday, 8 July 2011 23:11 (twelve years ago) link

i have to say that I still find the OSX finder annoying and clunky. will lion fix this or get rid of the finder entirely? I mean, I think windows xp explorer is better for viewing all the files in a directory. maybe no-one cares about this anymore.

akm, Friday, 8 July 2011 23:18 (twelve years ago) link

otm, finder is worse than death imo

Gary Barlow syndrome (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 8 July 2011 23:21 (twelve years ago) link

i feel like windows is more responsive when looking through a directory with a million files but just as clunky as anything.

there was an interesting booklet by Jef Raskin that made the argument that you don't need discrete files or filenames per se, but something closer to a tagging system, but are people really ready to give up files?

Philip Nunez, Friday, 8 July 2011 23:28 (twelve years ago) link

OS X has been inching away from files for a while. all it would take is for spotlight to be be able to index something other than "files" and we'd basically be there.

lukas, Friday, 8 July 2011 23:32 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.