ann coulter is pretty

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (638 of them)
define "that many!"

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

This is not a party that I am invited to.

sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link

grasping

exactly. I think that's been the schtick, to always dump so much effort into being "outrageous," that it becomes to require more and more thrashing about, like a rabid doberman staked in a front yard just straining to get at those delicious toddlers frollicking next door.

"grasping" (and "gasping") are really OTM terms here.

kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Crazies who want to fuck her are sticking by her, based on comments sections to some of those pages posted upthread.

Dan (Yikes) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Bill Maher to thread.

sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Andrew Sullivan:

But the problem with Coulter is that she is a form of camp, is she not? The minute you take her seriously, you lose grip on her reality. She's not a social or political commentator. She's a drag queen impersonating a fascist. I don't even begin to believe she actually believes this stuff. It's post-modern performance-art. I think of Coulter in that sense as more at home on the pomo-left than the Christianist right (which is why the joke, ultimately, is on the Republicans who like her). Devoid of sincerity, detached from any value but performance, juggling rhetoric for its own sake, she is Stanley Fish's model student. Half the time, I tend to think that a Hannity or O'Reilly or Malkin actually believes their own rhetoric. With Coulter, I don't believe it for a second. And so her vileness cannot be taken seriously. She is worse than vile. She is just empty.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link

that's kind of how I always viewed her, except she isn't funny, and if she is, nobody is getting the joke.

DAVE, for #1 Hits of yesterday and today! (dave225.3), Thursday, 8 June 2006 18:39 (seventeen years ago) link

My friend who took the time to read a lot of Leo Strauss proto-neoconservative work told me a while back how it's hinted that religion is a necessity for the majority of the population but the governing/ruling body doesn't necessarily have to believe. Panacea for the masses, etc. When I heard about this Coulter book, that was the first thing I thought of.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 8 June 2006 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I am wondering if there are really that many crazies who will continue to stand by her after the 9/11 comments?

the comments on the few blogs i skimmed (i had to stop pretty quickly because i honestly thought i was going to have a stroke) were totally supportive. people were saying things like "people die every day - why should those women get more sympathy than anyone else?" and "it's sickening that they're using the death of loved ones to further the liberal agenda" and "if they really cared about america, they wouldn't be trying to weaken it."

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 8 June 2006 18:59 (seventeen years ago) link

(and that's a really polite spin on it.)

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 8 June 2006 19:00 (seventeen years ago) link

O'Reilly was predictably appalled, in a mild sort of way.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 19:03 (seventeen years ago) link

My friend who took the time to read a lot of Leo Strauss proto-neoconservative work told me a while back how it's hinted that religion is a necessity for the majority of the population but the governing/ruling body doesn't necessarily have to believe.

The idea is older than that. It's probably as old as government itself.

"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful."

-Seneca
4-65 AD

sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 8 June 2006 19:04 (seventeen years ago) link

"A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider God fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the Gods on his side."

-Aristotle

sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Thursday, 8 June 2006 19:05 (seventeen years ago) link

and speaking of religious fronting:

who wants to read the first chapter of her latest book? see if you spot more of her cut & paste scribblin's!

kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 June 2006 21:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Whoa, is she for real with that comment about American Christian destiny = jetskis, steak on the electric grill, and night skiing and that environmentalism is a repudiation of this? Even tongue in cheek?

She's pretty, yeah, if too old for me.

Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:12 (seventeen years ago) link

You go, Rahm Emmanuel (D-Illinois)

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Friday, 9 June 2006 12:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I can't read that chapter. It's making my head hurt. The random breast implants ref is the part where I was really like, ok, plz to learn one English and rhetoric class.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Friday, 9 June 2006 13:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Rahm "Random House PR Rep" Emmanuel

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:02 (seventeen years ago) link

an ad at Drudge: "Ann Coulter needs your help..."

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

http://home.comcast.net/~bernievision/Coulter_Mouse_pad.jpg

"feel her up - then she will talk to you about welfare"

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Okay, the last thing I read that was that incoherent and stupid was the first three pages of The Isis Papers.

Dan (Holy Shit) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:44 (seventeen years ago) link

(The Coulter thing, not Mike's post!)

Dan (Whoops) Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I get in if is in apple house to tomato !

http://images.google.com/images?svnum=30&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=apple+house

Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:45 (seventeen years ago) link

It's probably not even worth the effort of arguing but yeah, what I've read of that chapter is just absurd, setting up a broad strawman and attacking with no reasoning. Who exactly is she talking about? Andrea Dworkin and Hollywood sex symbols are on the same side? Worshipping Hollywood body image ideals is part of liberalism (even though liberal faith crazily proclaims that breast implants might be bad for you)? Shinto is one of the most popular religions amongst liberals?! There are no Christian environmentalists? And do conservatives really believe that we should (paraphrasing) "populate the earth until it's standing room only and then colonize Mars"? The metric system has been attempted many times but never really caught on? Is the Swedish standard of livingIt's impossible for birds to become extinct? . . . At least P. J. O'Rourke is sometimes funny and makes some kind of logical sense. (And how would AC deal with his love of promiscuity and soft drugs?)

I suspect I know the answer to this but in a country ruled by Republicans, that's the world's bastion of capitalism, with such a strong Christian influence, why are conservative writers so obsessed with what 'liberals' think?

Sundar (sundar), Friday, 9 June 2006 18:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Roemer

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 9 June 2006 19:21 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't find her physically attractive at all. that whole willowy blonde bimbo thing = nastyville.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 June 2006 19:27 (seventeen years ago) link

I suspect I know the answer to this but in a country ruled by Republicans, that's the world's bastion of capitalism, with such a strong Christian influence, why are conservative writers so obsessed with what 'liberals' think?

because all of the ideology seems to have fallen out of American conservatism, leaving only a constant posture of fear of and aggression towards the "enemy"? viz. the apparently genuine fear that America might become an Islamic theocracy.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Friday, 9 June 2006 19:27 (seventeen years ago) link

http://adweek.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/anncoulter_1.jpg

I bet cheerios will love this picture.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Wow what happened to her.

Allyzay will never stop making pancakes (allyzay), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:24 (seventeen years ago) link

She was awful on Leno last night. The audience was definitely on her side, though, and if George Carlin (the previous guest) said anything in response to her bullshit, they cut it out. LENO was actually criticizing her in his wimpy way, but Carlin was mute almost entirely throughout.

She's not pretty or funny, btw.

Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link

The audience was definitely on her side, though

I read that a large group of her fans bought up the Leno tickets, so poor wickle Ann did not have to endure any jeering or boos.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I figured as much.

Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:37 (seventeen years ago) link

You know the best thing to do would be to not take her seriously (andrew sullivan otm) but then everybody else takes her seriously, and you're never really sure when somebody's been taken seriously long enough that you HAVE to take them seriously.

I don't think I ever saw an episode of Leno in its entirety before, but euuugh. Dude made a PAULA JONES joke in his monologue.

Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link

His comedy is for conservative retirees.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

If it was her hardcore fans who paid to come and make her look good, they could have at least laughed once or twice. She kept giving inane joke answers which were all the more painful when hit by audience silence.

Abbott (Abbott), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:44 (seventeen years ago) link

she got a few ovations though, which were creepy enough.

Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link

for which bits?

kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:49 (seventeen years ago) link

Youtube?

(I don't know why I've become fascinated by her.)

Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 15 June 2006 15:51 (seventeen years ago) link

eight months pass...
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/02/coulter-cpac-i-would-comment-on-john-edwards-but-it-turns-out-you-have-to-go-into-rehab-if-you-use-the-word-%e2%80%98faggot%e2%80%99/

stevie, Sunday, 4 March 2007 12:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Ann Coulter at CPAC

stevie, Sunday, 4 March 2007 12:17 (seventeen years ago) link

conservatives mostly too cowardly to repudiate this garbage. hah.

daria-g, Sunday, 4 March 2007 21:43 (seventeen years ago) link

wow timing

john... uh edwards... is like... ah... total fag lol!!!

jhøshea, Sunday, 4 March 2007 21:57 (seventeen years ago) link

She also made a fat Al Gore joke.

Mike Dixn, Sunday, 4 March 2007 22:00 (seventeen years ago) link

several people on ilx use the word faggot

Lingbert, Sunday, 4 March 2007 22:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Whatever, homo. This is different.

milo z, Sunday, 4 March 2007 22:50 (seventeen years ago) link

The comments on American Coprophagia are OTM = amcop.blogspot.com

Ben Boyerrr, Sunday, 4 March 2007 22:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Yes but ilxors use it with several layers of meta-irony because they are hip like that or whatever.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 4 March 2007 22:53 (seventeen years ago) link

and besides ilxors are dumpy and she is pretty

jhøshea, Sunday, 4 March 2007 23:03 (seventeen years ago) link

several people on ilx use the word faggot

Lingbert on Sunday, March 4, 2007 5:47 PM (23 minutes ago)


Yes, and using the word faggot on an internet message board is exactly the same as using it on CSPAN during a serious political press conference featuring presidential candidates.

jessie monster, Sunday, 4 March 2007 23:12 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.