Animal Collective - Merriweather Post Pavilion (2009)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2057 of them)

still think the middle of "in the flowers" is my favorite part. the live version of brothersport was way better than this album cut too imo

That middle section is a motherfucker, isn't? Your average indie/Brit pop band would've gone retro and employed some tired-ass wall of sound nicked from Beach Boys/Beatles/Spector. But AC builds it fomr noise, electronica, even some bass music. Gorgeous.

QuantumNoise, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:09 (fifteen years ago) link

"Bluish" is the best song here, it reminds me of Scritti Politti.

zeus, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:07 (fifteen years ago) link

i downloaded a link from the Prince thread a few days ago that was labelled Merriweather Post Pavilion. that pissed me off to know that i had downloaded some bullshit album instead of the killer Prince goodies i expected. this morning i decided to finally unzip the archive to take a listen after reading the comments on this thread. the zip turned out to be labelled as if it were the Animal Collective album but each track was Rick Astley. I have to say, i love it. Each track is exactly the same but somehow i feel like i'll enjoy listening to 12 Rickrolls in a row rather than this new AC album. Thanks internet jokester, you made my morning!

brotherlovesdub, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

haha!

Plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, 9 January 2009 20:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Roxy needs to add that as a testimonial on the sidebar of her blog.

xhuxk e. xheese (jaymc), Friday, 9 January 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Is it just me or don't these overhyped albums usually come a lot earlier in a band's career?

Plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, 9 January 2009 20:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Am I the only one who really likes Taste?

ecuador_with_a_c, Saturday, 10 January 2009 01:24 (fifteen years ago) link

really lacks taste maybe

roxymuzak, Saturday, 10 January 2009 01:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Is it just me or don't these overhyped albums usually come a lot earlier in a band's career?
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, January 9, 2009 8:55 PM

They often come after a band's been around for a few years and has cultivated a loyal audience that grows with each album--then the breakthrough, leading to this kind of fever pitch--see the Flaming Lips' Soft Bulletin. (I have not heard the album yet. Never been an AC fan. But I'm very curious.)

Matos W.K., Saturday, 10 January 2009 03:20 (fifteen years ago) link

You won't like it.

M.V., Saturday, 10 January 2009 04:40 (fifteen years ago) link

I like Taste a lot actually. Definitely has the most dub sound out of the bunch.

Andrew Sandwich, Saturday, 10 January 2009 05:45 (fifteen years ago) link

""Bluish" is the best song here, it reminds me of Scritti Politti."
one of the best yes.
i'd say MBV meets 10cc.

my friend argues that the album reminds him of The Beta Band.
after rejecting that opinion cause i hate Beta Band's latest records, i think he is right at least to some extent.

Zeno, Saturday, 10 January 2009 06:00 (fifteen years ago) link

singing in complex rhythms is often FAIL, especially on this record

❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Saturday, 10 January 2009 06:03 (fifteen years ago) link

I was skeptical after reading all the hype about Merriweather, but today I finished my review of it for The Stranger and I now believe Pitchfork actually underrated it. I know, I'm as shocked as anybody by this turn of events.

inhibitionist, Saturday, 10 January 2009 10:52 (fifteen years ago) link

The Stranger you say? do u have a link to ur review?

Also i fuk with My Girls except for the "whoooo" yelp

wilter, Saturday, 10 January 2009 11:01 (fifteen years ago) link

"whoooo" yelp

^^best part imo

gr8080, Saturday, 10 January 2009 12:53 (fifteen years ago) link

this album is fine but it's fairly forgettable, I'm perpetually flabbergasted by the hype.

akm, Saturday, 10 January 2009 14:25 (fifteen years ago) link

breath into this paper bag

Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 10 January 2009 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link

grady is correct as always

cutty, Saturday, 10 January 2009 14:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it just reminds me of fix up look sharp by dizzee rascal

wilter, Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link

the woooh is amazing.

Tim F, Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Then he reread four or five pages of his poem to me. Verbal ostentation was the perverse principle that had guided his revisions: where he had formerly written "blue" he now had "azure," "cerulean," and even "bluish."

ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it just reminds me of fix up look sharp by dizzee rascal

― wilter

which is surely a good thing!

Women can be captains too, you know? (jim), Saturday, 10 January 2009 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link

also the low-end on that song

gr8080, Saturday, 10 January 2009 20:29 (fifteen years ago) link

wilter: Review will be online/on the street Wed afternoon, Jan. 14.

inhibitionist, Saturday, 10 January 2009 21:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Just pre-ordered the album from Amazon.com!

$9.99, shipped (They have this Amazon Prime offer for free shipping, pm me and I'll help you out)

Can't wait 'till the 20th--well, I chose 2-day shipping...Can't wait 'till the 22nd!

nominal, Sunday, 11 January 2009 21:25 (fifteen years ago) link

DeepDiscount.com often ships early, apparently assuming the album will not reach you till on or after the release date. This assumption is sometimes too pessimistic.

M.V., Monday, 12 January 2009 03:47 (fifteen years ago) link

they were playing the promo in Easy Street Records this weekend.

brotherlovesdub, Monday, 12 January 2009 04:13 (fifteen years ago) link

inhibitionist, did your review by chance mention how their singing is often times annoying (maybe in more clever words)?

❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Monday, 12 January 2009 05:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Then he reread four or five pages of his poem to me. Verbal ostentation was the perverse principle that had guided his revisions: where he had formerly written "blue" he now had "azure," "cerulean," and even "bluish."

hello i have spotted yr Borges allusion

St3ve Go1db3rg, Monday, 12 January 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Just listened to it for the first time. Loved it. And this thread actually convinced me to buy the album, which I haven't done in yonks. My Girls is my jam. The cd cover doesn't move though. ;_;

a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

The cd cover doesn't move though. ;_;

OK waht! Does the vinyl sleeve move? This is important information for my buying decision!

britisher ringpulls (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 12 January 2009 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

well, the cover doesn't move, it's an optical illusion (I haven't read the previous posts so I don't if that's what you're talking about, though...).

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

ok, sorry, it doesn't appear to be moving when i look at the optical illusion.

a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago) link

really ?

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

it does on screen but not the physical object. as far as i can tell.

a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I haven't seen the physical object yet.
but this picture must NOT be watched when hungover !

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link

eurgh this thing is making me sick. I hadnt noticed this before. So what - the trick works in the digi-world but not on the physical copies??

baaderonixx, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link

Does the image appear to move if you take the inlay out of the case? (I mean, apart from moving, errr, out of the case...)

britisher ringpulls (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 12 January 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link

apparently, it doesn't move or not as much on the physical object as on screen.
weird.

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link

it's not a traditional cd case, it's just a card thing with a little folding thing inside with the cd and inlay and stuff inside. presumably done so to give the full effect of the illusion but it just doesn't work. still looks cool though.

a hoy hoy, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm going to use this .jpg as my desktop wallpaper and see how long I can stand it.

baaderonixx, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link

i've looked at the vinyl cover and it does move but not as much as that .jpg above.

Women can be captains too, you know? (jim), Monday, 12 January 2009 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link

you could use it as your FLAT's wallpaper (extra special touch : on the ceiling) !

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link

I guess it has something to do with the backlight of a screen compared to printed paper...

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe the SIZE too

ice cr?m, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link

well the size of the picture above is roughly the same as a CD, right ?

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

that would DEPEND

ice cr?m, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link

oh great, I've just discovered that when you scroll the screen up and down while left clicking on the scrolling block thingy on the right of the screen frame (dunno what it's called) instead of scrolling with the thing on the mouse, the little "beans' in the picture move in circle !
(not sure my whole description is crystal clear...)

AleXTC, Monday, 12 January 2009 17:31 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.