craftsmanship, consumerism, virtue, privilege, and quality

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2150 of them)

Think Biff Loman would move to North Dakota but tbh this belongs in the limbo thread

Nicholas Pokémon (silby), Tuesday, 13 March 2012 03:28 (twelve years ago) link

four weeks pass...

“In the ’80s, things just literally fell off a cliff.” Or, as he states pointedly on the O.M.A. Web site, “People not only forgot what great sound reproduction sounded like, but at this point, most have never even heard it.”

I am about to hear it, through the Imperias, which go for $175,000 and are tall like basketball players, each speaker horn cut from solid Pennsylvania black walnut, polished to a vaguely midcentury West Coast finish.

Fuck you, clown.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:33 (twelve years ago) link

High-end audiophiles always strike me as the sort of people who would never ever go to a concert.

raw feel vegan (silby), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:38 (twelve years ago) link

they can't afford to! they spent all their money on the vaguely midcentury west coast finish.

scott seward, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago) link

I am pretty sure half these dudes own four albums, and three of them are different remasters of Dark Side of the Moon.

mh, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:40 (twelve years ago) link

is 'midcentury' code for craftsmanship? lol

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago) link

oh, lol, they actually mention that on the second page

mh, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:42 (twelve years ago) link

can't read the article, gfy nyt

i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago) link

you got greedy and wasted all 10 already???

iatee, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:44 (twelve years ago) link

i love when ned swears. meanwhile, the first person to buy a pair was his HERO anton corbijijn!

scott seward, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:44 (twelve years ago) link

from dude's website

There was a time, in the early part of the Twentieth Century, when the creation of horn loaded loudspeakers, field coil and full range speakers, tube amplifiers, and analog reproduction represented the highest technical challenge and achievement. As time went on, every new innovation in sound, from solid state to digital to file sharing, turned out to bring the overall quality of sound in our lives to a lower level. People not only forgot what great sound reproduction sounded like, but at this point, most have never even heard it.

mh, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago) link

meanwhile, the first person to buy a pair was his HERO anton corbijijn!

More money than sense, that man.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago) link

xp that is some straight up bullshit. There is no way that a turntable, amp, and speakers from 1950 sounds better than even it's 1980's equivalent.

they do do doo doo sandwiches (snoball), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:49 (twelve years ago) link

I wonder if the early Misfits still sound like they were recorded in a bathroom on $175k speakers

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:50 (twelve years ago) link

would be fun to invite this guy and his pals for a weeklong sound tasting and then just play Miami Bass 24/7

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:51 (twelve years ago) link

I am sure the best equipment from 1975 sounds better than laptop speakers, yeah

mh, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago) link

old speakers do sound heavenly. to me. i will say that. i mean for analog sound i would definitely prefer older speakers. they were made for it. not so nowadays. unless some freak like this makes you a custom pair.

scott seward, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:54 (twelve years ago) link

xp that is some straight up bullshit. There is no way that a turntable, amp, and speakers from 1950 sounds better than even it's 1980's equivalent.

yeah, wtf? the 20s-50s as the golden age of tru audio fidelity? complete bullshit.

preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:56 (twelve years ago) link

I think it was scott who had some pioneer speakers in a pic that I have -- I got lucky and finally grabbed my dad's 1972-vintage ones. Which, sure, old.. but I think he paid $1k for two speakers and a receiver back then. I think you can get some pretty fucking nice speakers for the 2012 equivalent of $1k.

mh, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago) link

ya'll ever listen to those 78rpm discs they were making up into the mid-fifties? those things sound gorgeous! way better than any lp from the 1980s that i can think of.

hell, even crank victrolas with one-use steel needles playing electrically recorded discs (the nice ones like victor scrolls, columbia vivatonals and okeh electric's) from the late 20s sound better than a lot of records from the 1980s imo. but that is a contrarian position perhaps.

one dis leads to another (ian), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 21:13 (twelve years ago) link

to clarify the first part of that post, i mean 78s produced in the mid-fifties not everything leading up to that point. duh. they really had it down by then! and the faster it spins, the better it sounds..

one dis leads to another (ian), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 21:13 (twelve years ago) link

faster spin = better sound is true, but beyond that...

disagree about steel needle crank victrolas of whatever sort sounding better than even midrange quality amplified electromagnetic speakers

preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 21:17 (twelve years ago) link

imo there is a liveness to that sound that makes up for the lack of definition--which has more to do with the way it was recorded than the way it's being reproduced. idk, i don't think abt it much, but listening to mid-50s 78s is a good experience for someone who wants to hear an obviously 'better' sound than their mp3s or ipod can provide. just ranbling here.

one dis leads to another (ian), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 21:19 (twelve years ago) link

http://nymag.com/news/features/artisanal-brooklyn-2012-4/

ffs.

s.clover, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 04:29 (twelve years ago) link

like 2/3 of all nymag cover stories are trollgaze.

s.clover, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 04:30 (twelve years ago) link

eh seems mostly fine to me

iatee, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 04:51 (twelve years ago) link

it would.

s.clover, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:14 (twelve years ago) link

weren't you mourning the death of american manufacturing jobs in another thread?

iatee, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:16 (twelve years ago) link

right. so everyone should just make some overpriced fucking pickles and yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait. great plan adam smith.

s.clover, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:21 (twelve years ago) link

No health plan? Home getting repossessed? There's always etsy!

s.clover, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:23 (twelve years ago) link

ta

yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait (contenderizer), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:25 (twelve years ago) link

I'm not suggesting the etsy business model is gonna save america, just that it's not 'a bad thing'

iatee, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:25 (twelve years ago) link

i'm going to make cat bacon by the way. can't fail.

yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait (contenderizer), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:26 (twelve years ago) link

whimsical microbrewery to the world/artisanal knife maker, flea market of bent wire/city of skinny jeans.

s.clover, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:28 (twelve years ago) link

why is the 'brooklyn' brand really any more ridiculous than any other brand in 2012?

iatee, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:31 (twelve years ago) link

iatee's kinda right btw. so's s.clover. the yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait model has advantages in that it's essentially a patronage system for artisanal craftspeople with some pr savvy, and at its best, it can divert a significant amount of money (relatively speaking) into the hands of third-world producers. that's all to the good! downside, of course, is that it's a small niche market, like making paintings, horseshoes or beer for the aristocracy. only a few get to play at that level, and sadly, in the modern age, those few tend to be slumming aristocrats.

yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait (contenderizer), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:31 (twelve years ago) link

why is the 'brooklyn' brand really any more ridiculous than any other brand in 2012?

i lived in brooklyn. as a result, i would never buy "brooklyn industries" crap if my life depended on it. the very idea makes my skin crawl. exploiters pimping out the very fact of their exploitation. no. i will not play that game. even mcdonalds is less offensive. it at least is content to mean absolutely nothing.

yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait (contenderizer), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:33 (twelve years ago) link

what are they exploiting, it's just a word

iatee, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:35 (twelve years ago) link

ah, come on, nothing is ever "just" anything

everything means something, really means a bunch of different things, depending on your perspective

yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait (contenderizer), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:41 (twelve years ago) link

there's a strange and obstinate sort of literalism to your vision. i respect its consistency but just can't embrace it.

yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait (contenderizer), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:43 (twelve years ago) link

people buy the stupidest shit, and not just people in brooklyn, people everywhere. there are about 5 billion times as many designer t-shirts in the world as designer jars of pickles. somebody created a new market for something via branding? great, one more person with a job.

iatee, Tuesday, 17 April 2012 05:59 (twelve years ago) link

yeah, that part i'm cool with. more power to the creatively inclined! don't mean i gotta pay $18 dollars for your jar of merely adequate pickles. or embrace your hives-inducing "made in brooklyn" branding.

yuppie bullshit chocolate blogbait (contenderizer), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 06:07 (twelve years ago) link

i lived in brooklyn. as a result, i would never buy "brooklyn industries" crap if my life depended on it.

lol @ u

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 10:57 (twelve years ago) link

it's almost as if there is something inherently, almost commodifiably authentic about the true Brooklyn spirit

john-claude van donne (schlump), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 11:19 (twelve years ago) link

there's a certain type of noxious boosterism that attaches to some neighborhoods/boroughs, for instance hackney in london is approaching brooklyn levels of boastful swag, you see shirts that say things like "proper east" on them, but you don't see the same things in quite the same quantity or force in places like brixton or queens

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 11:23 (twelve years ago) link

and i'm not sure why, like what determines these almost hysterical levels of neighborhood "pride" or whatever

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 11:23 (twelve years ago) link

"i lived in hollister, california and i wouldn't buy 'hollister' crap if my life depended on it."

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 11:30 (twelve years ago) link

it's funny what those things connote, as well; I remember hearing about the Wilmslow credit card that was available to certain Mancunians at I guess some point in the '90s, speaking to one's success & place; or conversely the M21 branded tote bags you can get in the sorta right-on area of Chorlton in Manchester today, identifying you as an environmentally conscious resident.
xp

john-claude van donne (schlump), Tuesday, 17 April 2012 11:32 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.