probably should be asking yourself that question
― markers, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:11 (nine years ago) link
this american life mike daisey retraction transcript, p interesting, warning PDF http://podcast.thisamericanlife.org/special/TAL_460_Retraction_Transcript.pdf
― lag∞n, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:14 (nine years ago) link
is there a transcript of the original show
― flagp∞st (dayo), Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:18 (nine years ago) link
the original show is just excerpts from his stage show and apparently you can download the script of that from his website
― lag∞n, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:20 (nine years ago) link
Love how all the Read & Trust bloggers are now flying over to China to investigate Foxconn for themselves.
― James Mitchell, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:27 (nine years ago) link
wanted to say something re the tendency to criticize chinese factories as sweatshops, in that its not an accurate characterization of foxconn et al, which is not to say theyre great places to work, just that theyre un great places to work in somewhat different ways than a sweatshop, i found this description from mo tkaciks steve jobs piece compelling
When imagination is off the table, you get coverage like CNN’s Foxconn series, in which CNN interviews a disgruntled Foxconn employee complaining of “dehumanization” and, lacking anything terribly sensational or sordid, asks her if she might be able to quantify that. We learn that the job entails sticking more than 4,000 stickers onto iPads each day.
― lag∞n, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:31 (nine years ago) link
kind of amazing this is a guy who makes his living via public speaking and has no idea how poorly hes coming off
Mike Daisey: Yes. And I stand by it as a theatrical work. I stand by how it makes people see and care about the situation that’s happening there. I stand by it in the theater. And I regret, deeply, that it was put into this context on your show.
Ira Glass: Are you going to change the way that you label this in the theater, so that the audience in the theater knows that this isn’t strictly speaking a work of truth but in fact what they’re seeing really is a work of fiction that has some true elements in it.
Mike Daisey: Well, I don’t know that I would say in a theatrical context that it isn’t true. I believe that when I perform it in a theatrical context in the theater that when people hear the story in those terms that we have different languages for what the truth means.
Ira Glass: I understand that you believe that but I think you’re kidding yourself in the way that normal people who go to see a person talk – people take it as a literal truth. I thought that the story was literally true seeing it in the theater. Brian, who’s seen other shows of yours, thought all of them were true. I saw your nuclear show, I thought that was completely true. I thought it was true because you were on stage saying ‘this happened to me.’ I took you at your word.
Mike Daisey: I think you can trust my word in the context of the theater. And how people see it -
and these are the things he said after ira grilled him once he had a chance to think abt it then asked to come back again!
― lag∞n, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:43 (nine years ago) link
third part is p cool where they tell you what they do know abt apple chinese manufactring irl
Ira Glass: One of the most interesting things and one of the newest things, that I think you pointed out in this series, is that the cost of labor in an iPhone, if it were made in the United States, would be only about $65 more per phone. I mean that’s a lot of money if you’re manufacturing stuff, um, but with iPhones selling with hundreds of dollars of profit in each phone, Apple could still make a profit if 24it were manufacturing in the U.S., and you have an entire article where you lay out that is not actually the main reason these are made overseas at this point.
Charles Duhigg: That's exactly right. And, and that $65, that's the high-end estimate. Some people told us that you could, from a labor perspective you could build the iPhone in the United States for just ten extra dollars a phone if you're paying American wages. But wages, labor is such an enormously small part of any electronic device, right?Compared to the cost of buying chips or making sure that you have a plant that can turn out thousands of these things a day or being able to get strengthened glass cut exactly right within, you know, two days of this thing being due, that's what's important. Labor is almost insignificant. What is really important are supply chains and flexibility of factories. You want to be able to be located right next to the plant that makes the screws so that when you need a small change to that screw factory, you can go next door and say, "Give it to me in six hours," and they can say, "Here you go." Because if that factory was in another state or on another continent, it would take two weeks. It’s the flexibility within the Chinese manufacturing system, that’s what you can do in Asia that you can’t do in the United States.
Ira Glass: There's, there's a bunch of incredible stories you tell in that article, and one of them is you talk about the number of industrial engineers needed to oversee 200,000 assembly line, line workers. You say there's 8,700 industrial engineers that you need. And so to get this plant going, to get this particular operation going that you were writing about—I can't remember which one it is—you said it would take nine months to find those 8,700 industrial engineers in the United States, and in China, how long it took?
Charles Duhigg: 15 days. And that 15 day figure? The guy who told me that, also told that that’s because they kind of drug their heels on it a little bit. They probably could’ve done it faster.
― lag∞n, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:54 (nine years ago) link
yah it's not just labor it's the whole supply chain charles dugong wrote a nyt article about it you should check it out
― flagp∞st (dayo), Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:57 (nine years ago) link
yah he recommends it at the end of the show too
― lag∞n, Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:58 (nine years ago) link
the story was always pretty unbelievable in that he'd get that much information about that many experiences from that many ppl (especially the dissidents and organizers and whatever) just by essentially hanging around a factory gate.
― s.clover, Saturday, 17 March 2012 01:10 (nine years ago) link
this is pretty hilarious: "Cathy says she’s never seen a gun in person, only in the movies and on tv, so she’d remember it."
― s.clover, Saturday, 17 March 2012 01:15 (nine years ago) link
ha yeah that was an excellent america shaming moment
― lag∞n, Saturday, 17 March 2012 01:22 (nine years ago) link
his mike daisey scoodenfroody is gross
― byan wein (cozen), Saturday, 17 March 2012 06:42 (nine years ago) link
don't want to get all james mitchell, but gruber really is going in hard on this foxconn/daisey story now that he can talk about journalism, having basically ignored it for the past three months.
― caek, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 09:14 (nine years ago) link
i bet the daring fireball style guide says don't lie (and capitalize "Internet")
still waiting for him to explain how Apple can buy the company from the shareholders using their own money
― stet, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 09:41 (nine years ago) link
― caek, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 10:39 (nine years ago) link
― dandydonweiner, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 12:31 (nine years ago) link
That is a pretty normal thing! Are you wondering how they kept issuing stock to employees as bonuses?
Undiluting Apple stock is pretty hilarious at this point, though
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:13 (nine years ago) link
Eh? No, wait, i'm not saying they can't do stock buybacks -- what they can't do is take the company private (eg a mgment buyout) using that money. Board members can't use the company's money to buy it from itself.
― stet, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:17 (nine years ago) link
I thought what they are planning is a buyback?
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:20 (nine years ago) link
you obviously don't read daring fireball
― caek, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:20 (nine years ago) link
Apple can’t control its stock price; that’s in the hands of investors. But it can control how much cash it keeps in reserve. If investors sour (or the market crashes) and the stock price dips, Apple could take itself private. I’m very intrigued about what they’re going to announce tomorrow.
I mean, I get what you're saying -- buy back stock with the company's money, then give that stock to executives -- but I think what their strategy is tends to be more in the way of compensating executives or giving them stock incentives if they stick around, tying their monetary interest in the company to long-term goals rather than striving for bonuses at the end of the year and then bailing for another job.
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:21 (nine years ago) link
oh jesus he really said that, I take all back, he's a moron
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:22 (nine years ago) link
― caek, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:22 (nine years ago) link
There are many good reasons for Apple making this move, but the likelihood of it ever going private is less than zero.
― dandydonweiner, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:31 (nine years ago) link
I don't get how dude can post stuff like that! I mean, it's one thing to betray a complete lack of financial knowledge, but if you talk that through out loud it doesn't even make any sense.
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:33 (nine years ago) link
he should go back to writing about what he knows best: mac os x 10.2-10.3 and perl
― caek, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:37 (nine years ago) link
I kind of have doubts about dude's perl chops tbh
Have we addressed the controversy about the meltdown that happened when people confronted him about the fact he was refusing to allow changes to markdown, including bugfixes people submitted a year prior, and wouldn't give up control?
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:41 (nine years ago) link
that was hilar. he wanted to keep it elegant, and keep focus by saying "no" to everything.
― stet, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:44 (nine years ago) link
He was good at demonstrating his savvy understanding of the programming and web communities.
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:45 (nine years ago) link
like the time he launched the effort to build a new Mail client? It was called Letters or something and was like the king of vaporware
― stet, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:49 (nine years ago) link
omg I don't remember that, but I bet it is amazing
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:49 (nine years ago) link
― stet, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:51 (nine years ago) link
The e-mail client will be called Letters, and project contributors voted Daring Fireball's John Gruber as the man to be responsible for getting version 1.0 out the door.
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:55 (nine years ago) link
that stuff about him being the director
― caek, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:55 (nine years ago) link
The whole $500 thing is kind of funny in view of the Mac App Store, too. What would that be today -- a $80 app like Aperture?
Meanwhile, Sparrow for iPhone launched and the reviews included "TOO COSTLY FOR A PROGRAM THAT DOESN'T HAVE PUSH" and it's friggin $3
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 13:56 (nine years ago) link
Sparrow would be great but no push is deal breaker. And sorry, working with Boxcar just isn't the same. Urban Airship would be a better integration.
Gruber has a lot of good posts, but he gets prickly very easily.
― dandydonweiner, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:24 (nine years ago) link
Yeah, that wasn't the real issue there... people weren't saying "oh, I need this one feature, I will avoid it due to that"
It was "NOT WORTH $3" when it has a shitload of features!
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:27 (nine years ago) link
I think what people are saying is that that $3 for an app that is missing an essential feature is too costly.
― dandydonweiner, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:29 (nine years ago) link
And FWIW, if Sparrow was made by Google for Android, Gruber would be shelling that corpse with glee for not having push.
(I'm too lazy to go find his post on the release of the standalone Gmail app)
― dandydonweiner, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:30 (nine years ago) link
(whose push feature was fooked)
eh, fair enough.
The entertaining bit is that if you set up a gmail account on an iPhone, it doesn't use gmail's exchange/push server by default so the app currently works with gmail the same way Apple's mail client does, by default. /Gruber
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:39 (nine years ago) link
Yeah, I always wonder if that is Apple's middle finger at Google somehow.
― dandydonweiner, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:49 (nine years ago) link
eh, I think it's more the fact that Google still doesn't show it in their setup directions that clearly! You only get the directions on the mobile site, and there under "Google Sync," not under email setup. I think it's officially supported and non-beta, but maybe that's not what they tell Apple?
― mh, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:58 (nine years ago) link
Imagine how frustrating this situation must be for monologists who do value the truth, who are performing true journalism.
err is journalism + stage performance a thing?
― grimes - (the elder scrolls iv:) oblivion (diamonddave85), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 15:20 (nine years ago) link