Which I am sure he was not asked about on the Sunday talk show he was where he vowed to get all the details on the Secret Service scandal.
Meanwhile a non-surprising analysis of the Sunday talk shows shows the programs weighted toward Republican guests and
tilt to the right isn’t exclusive to a GOP primary. According to the study, the shows skewed right even during the 2004 election.
Partisanship aside, women made up just 29 percent of the shows’ roundtable guests. Eighty-five percent of the guests were white, 11 percent were African American and 3 percent were Latino.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/fair-study-republicans-sunday-shows.php
― curmudgeon, Monday, 23 April 2012 14:52 (twelve years ago) link
he was on
― curmudgeon, Monday, 23 April 2012 14:53 (twelve years ago) link
11 percent were African American and, more like 10 percent was harold ford and 1 pct was other
― goole, Monday, 23 April 2012 14:58 (twelve years ago) link
^^
Yes.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 23 April 2012 15:02 (twelve years ago) link
and Donna Brazile.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 23 April 2012 15:02 (twelve years ago) link
I guess Glenn Greenwald's one appearance on "This Week" offended George Will enough to rescind future invitations.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 23 April 2012 15:03 (twelve years ago) link
Will this Dallas rich guy's donations help him out (in the nuclear waste dumping biz)? He has donated $18.7 million to Republican political organizations—
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/magazine/102778/harold-simmons-campaign-donor-2012-gop?page=0,0
― curmudgeon, Monday, 23 April 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago) link
A billionaire knows that it never hurts business to have a passel of politicians deeply indebted to you, so although he probably has a laundry list of favors he'll be pushing for, he probably views his donations as much as a kind of insurance as anything else. He's just making sure the politicians don't get any fancy-pants ideas about mere voters being important.
― Aimless, Monday, 23 April 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago) link
Minnesota's party of fiscal responsibility to be evicted from its St. Paul headquarters for non-payment of rent:
http://www.startribune.com/politics/statelocal/148535875.html
― l0u1s j0rdan (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 23 April 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago) link
i wonder what this means for this year's contests. amy klobuchar's opponent will probably not be short of money (but obv not as not-short as al franken's eventual opponent)
― goole, Monday, 23 April 2012 20:04 (twelve years ago) link
yay! (xpost)
― HE HATES THESE CANS (Austerity Ponies), Monday, 23 April 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago) link
well the new head says they're negotiating the back rent. considering commercial property vacancies i doubt they'll be out on the curb.
― goole, Monday, 23 April 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago) link
I just like that they're so in debt and and being embarassed
― HE HATES THESE CANS (Austerity Ponies), Monday, 23 April 2012 20:14 (twelve years ago) link
Drones for urban warfare.
http://www.salon.com/2012/04/24/drones_for_urban_warfare/
― stay in school if you want to kiw (Gukbe), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago) link
what could possibly go wrong?!
― Mad God 40/40 (Z S), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 02:45 (twelve years ago) link
This is one of the dumbest articles I've ever skimmed
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-foolhardy-trip-to-north-carolina/2012/04/24/gIQAkOQTfT_story.html
― cosi fan whitford (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 13:13 (twelve years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/L7WTp.png
one day I hope to grow up and become an opinion writer
― dayo, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 13:27 (twelve years ago) link
Pulitzer Prize winner Kathleen Parker
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 13:29 (twelve years ago) link
"The Pulitzer Prize in fiction takes dead aim at mediocrity and almost never misses" -Wm. Gass
― cosi fan whitford (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 13:37 (twelve years ago) link
http://news.yahoo.com/why-jon-huntsman-is-leaving-the-gop--not-because-they%E2%80%99re-communists-.html
did we talk about this?
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:04 (twelve years ago) link
x-post -I read that stupid Parker article. She believes that Obama visiting John Edwards' state of North Carolina is somehow worse than anything Bush ever did, but the press just won't admit this.
Bush staffers were well familiar with this routine, which is why they never would have allowed him to be in such a situation. Perhaps, as another close political observer suggested to me, the Obama White House has no such concerns. The media simply do not come after Obama in the same way they did Bush, notwithstanding recent research showing that Obama received the most negative coverage of any presidential candidate during the Republican primary. The Bush White House was under siege and conducted itself accordingly. No T’s went uncrossed.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:18 (twelve years ago) link
"notwithstanding recent research"
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:19 (twelve years ago) link
x-postMaybe Huntsman will start hanging out with Tom Friedman's third party
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:21 (twelve years ago) link
I prefer he stay a Republican.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:21 (twelve years ago) link
not gonna lie, if one of the major political parties actually implodes during my lifetime and is replaced by something else I am gonna be PSYCHED
― I'M THAT POSTA, AAAAAAAAAH (DJP), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:23 (twelve years ago) link
unless, of course, the net effect is worse.
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:25 (twelve years ago) link
the gop is already imploding
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:26 (twelve years ago) link
But despite that, they still successfully filibuster in the US Senate, control the US House of Representatives and have lots of influence in state governments throughout the US
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:28 (twelve years ago) link
yup
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:28 (twelve years ago) link
when parties fall apart they are usually replace by something more 'extreme'. the reason for a party's dissolution is usually that there is a need or an issue of its potential sympathizers that isn't being voiced as well as they'd like
― goole, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:31 (twelve years ago) link
Rich ppl between age 55 and death still run nearly everything. Too bad they live so damn long.
Well, something more "extreme" is mandatory to convert us from an economy entirely focused on the limitless gobbling of resources. One party refuses to acknowledge the possibility of such a move, the other barely does.
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:34 (twelve years ago) link
when parties fall apart they are usually replaced by something more 'extreme'. the reason for a party's dissolution is usually that there is a need or an issue of its potential sympathizers that isn't being voiced as well as they'd like
well atm the gop is in a process of whittling itself down to the extremist right ~30% of america and in the process throwing a lot of elections it can win - including this one. plus is boxed in by long-term demographics. that's really not sustainable 2nd party in the longer-term...it doesn't really need a single issue.
also morbs otm unfortunately
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:48 (twelve years ago) link
politics can probably stay irrational longer than manhattan can stay above water
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago) link
when parties fall apart they are usually replaced by something more 'extreme'.
Is this true? Examples?
― L'ennui, cette maladie de tous les (Michael White), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago) link
whigs/know-nothings and the birth of the republicans, both dems and the GOP + wallace in the 60s
― goole, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 14:58 (twelve years ago) link
at a very rough guess i'd say the atrophy of british liberals and the rise of labour but i'm really talking out of my ass there
― goole, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:04 (twelve years ago) link
that's a small sample set and one that doesn't compare super well to american politics in 2012, I think.
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:06 (twelve years ago) link
the Republicans were more extreme than the Know Nothings?
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:11 (twelve years ago) link
opposition to slavery was 'extreme' and totally unserved by any political party at the time until the republicans showed up. know-nothings served the interests of northern laborers via nativism; republicans followed by expressing that anxiety contra 'the slave power'
― goole, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:15 (twelve years ago) link
well, the Dems didn't replace themselves in the '60s! They "evolved," partly out of necessity when the most extreme Southern racists began to leave.
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:26 (twelve years ago) link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Party_System
ppl disagree as to whether we are still in this or not
― goole, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:29 (twelve years ago) link
I say this a lot but comparing politics today to politics in the 1800s seems pretty fruitless.
one thing you can say is that the party system changes (nominally) v. infrequently.
another thing you can say is that the gop's politics just simply cannot sell on a national level forever + at the same time the only people left in the party are people who have had second helpings of kool aid.
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:40 (twelve years ago) link
For the GOP's policies, see also the Dem's actions.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:47 (twelve years ago) link
Maybe not forever, but as I mentioned above, it's working pretty well for them now in many states and in parts of the US govt.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago) link
well some states have a lot of kool aid, the massive economic downturn gave the gop a lot of cover, and the american political system allows a minority senate to fuck shit up. but that doesn't mean the gop hasn't boxed itself into a really poor place nationally.
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago) link
Forbes columnist analysis! Warning: Quotes Rasmussen polls as truth
http://douglasschoen.com/why-president-obama-is-unlikely-to-significantly-improve-his-standing-among-male-voters/
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago) link
Also warning: considers comparing poll results over the last 30 years to be in any way useful - oh yeah some of you guys love that shit.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 25 April 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago) link
rasmussen proves male voters are dumber, more racist, anti-obama
― wolves in our wounds (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 25 April 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago) link
2 conservative House Dems lose their primaries to more liberal opponents, primarily because of their opposition to healthcare and climate change legislation
― heavy is the head that eats the crayons (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:40 (twelve years ago) link
^^^in Pennsylvania btw