the most important election of your lifetime: 2012 american general election thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5607 of them)

oh, figures.

thillrer (loves laboured breathing), Thursday, 31 May 2012 14:15 (eleven years ago) link

Lots of peaches, too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvcohzJvviQ

clemenza, Thursday, 31 May 2012 14:44 (eleven years ago) link

Bad news is he has to commute 40 miles each way to his job in the city.

nickn, Thursday, 31 May 2012 17:03 (eleven years ago) link

He could no longer afford to live in his neighborhood.

the conch is a well worn copy of the AD&D Fiends Folio (Austerity Ponies), Thursday, 31 May 2012 19:15 (eleven years ago) link

"Corporations are people"

curmudgeon, Thursday, 31 May 2012 20:56 (eleven years ago) link

Barack, we hardly knew ye.

clemenza, Friday, 1 June 2012 15:06 (eleven years ago) link

Am I just not remembering, or were monthly jobs reports as big a deal 20 years ago? I followed Bush/Clinton pretty closely, and while I remember attention being paid to the general unemployment rate and GDP numbers, I don't recall such life-or-death anticipation of every jobs report.

clemenza, Friday, 1 June 2012 15:09 (eleven years ago) link

well we're in a pretty big financial hole, more than twenty years ago

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 15:13 (eleven years ago) link

Attempted augury of voters's November mood swings, five months in advance, so investors can buy the correct product in the presidential market?

Aimless, Friday, 1 June 2012 15:15 (eleven years ago) link

Guessing I'm probably the worst-dressed person ever to receive an e-mail from Anna Wintour.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 June 2012 15:23 (eleven years ago) link

obv you've never read The Zizek-Wintour Letters

Mordy, Sunday, 3 June 2012 17:05 (eleven years ago) link

haha, Bubba Eruption over the weekend, saying Mitt's corporate record was "sterling." Now backtracking.

Bill Clinton, gliding through a privileged life, doing pretty much as he pleases, defended Mitt Romney's business past. Said that Romney was qualified to be president. This from a senior Obama supporter.

I laughed when I read that. I can't stand Clinton, but that made my day. I'd shake whatever hand he doesn't jerk off with.

http://dennisperrin.blogspot.com/2012/06/ride-my-see-saw.html

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 01:47 (eleven years ago) link

why would that player use either of his own hands to jerk off with?

pplains, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 02:59 (eleven years ago) link

Lookin' old and thin since he gave up barbecue, not pullin' what he usta

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 11:48 (eleven years ago) link

this is going around but it won't last long. original still up at Romney's site for now though & lol all day:

As president, Mitt will work to expand and enhance access and opportunities for Americans to hunt, shoot, and protect their families, homes and property, and he will fight the battle on all fronts to protect and promote the Second Amendment.

decrepit but free (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 19:57 (eleven years ago) link

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

WHEY AHR MAH DREGUNS? (DJP), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 19:59 (eleven years ago) link

access and opportunities for Americans to hunt and shoot their families.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:01 (eleven years ago) link

the 2nd amendment guarantees my right to hunt my property and family, fuck you liberals

WHEY AHR MAH DREGUNS? (DJP), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:01 (eleven years ago) link

aaaahahahaha this is really getting me bad

decrepit but free (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:04 (eleven years ago) link

curmudgeon, I think the idea that Obama would send up a long series of jobs/stimulation bills to die in Congress, so he could run against a do-nothing Congress probably got killed by the democrats in Congress. They would see that startegy in a very different light, when they went home and faced ads that said something like:

(solemn deep voice) In the past year alone, Joe Blow voted for spending bills that, if they had passed, would have cost fifty gazillion dollars and ballooned the deficit like a bullfrog on helium. This time, vote for our smiling man with a nice suit and haircut, not that drunken sailor who'll piss away your children's future.

Aimless, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:09 (eleven years ago) link

more traditional than birth control

xp

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:09 (eleven years ago) link

oh shut up Bubba

retro-shittified (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 23:35 (eleven years ago) link

he's returned to his Screaming Lobster of Hope days.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 23:37 (eleven years ago) link

Mr. Johnson, it happened again: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/06/romney-campaign-misspelled-reagan.html

So far, the Romney campaign cannot spell "peek," "America" or "Reagan."

Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Thursday, 7 June 2012 01:09 (eleven years ago) link

Clinton's comments on Romney: BS, despicable

The tax cut thing: totally overblown, mostly just pragmatic.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 7 June 2012 03:43 (eleven years ago) link

The Senate awakens to the consequences of drone warfare and the cynicism of the White House leaks: Bradley Manning gets prosecuted while Obama reads Augustine's Confessions.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 7 June 2012 14:23 (eleven years ago) link

The Senate is concerned about drones suddenly-- but only with regards to leaking news about them, not however in terms of due process and civil liberties and effectiveness of whack and kill a mole in terms of a sole strategy to deal with the multiple problems in Pakistan, Yemen, etc.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:36 (eleven years ago) link

the Senate only cares about O taking credit for them. they want everyone to know there's blood on their hands too y'know!

retro-shittified (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:37 (eleven years ago) link

McCain's just jealous he doesn't get to personally target hapless muslims

retro-shittified (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:38 (eleven years ago) link

It's shame-free, of course, but look not at intentions. McCain actually made a good point:

“The fact that this administration would aggressively pursue leaks perpetrated by a 22-year-old Army private in the Wikileaks matter and former CIA employees in other leaks cases but apparently sanction leaks made by senior administration officials for political purposes is simply unacceptable,” Sen. McCain said.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:41 (eleven years ago) link

i disagree, tbh. when it comes to clandestine operations sanctioned by the administration, it seems appropriate for the white house to decide what to reveal and when to reveal it.

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:57 (eleven years ago) link

...and it also seems appropriate to punish army privates for deliberately leaking sensitive information.

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:58 (eleven years ago) link

McCain's denounciation would be much more forceful if it came from someone with moral principles.

Aimless, Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:58 (eleven years ago) link

'rizer lovin' the Imperial Presidency

this really is peripherally related to the thunderous bore of an election, or should be.

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 June 2012 18:59 (eleven years ago) link

would be much more forceful if it came from someone with moral principles.

now same-sex marriage strangely comes to mind...

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:00 (eleven years ago) link

McCain's denounciation would be much more forceful if it came from someone with moral principles.

It would be even more forceful if intentions mattered.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:01 (eleven years ago) link

i disagree, tbh. when it comes to clandestine operations sanctioned by the administration, it seems appropriate for the white house to decide what to reveal and when to reveal it.

You mean you don't want to meet this generation's Fawn Hall? I can't wait.

pplains, Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:02 (eleven years ago) link

It irritates me that Bradley Manning matters only as a pawn in the Dem-GOP scrimmage over principles both parties share, that's for sure.

go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:02 (eleven years ago) link

i just mean that i'm somewhat willing to grant the administration the license to reveal the general scope of clandestine operations (on a big picture, "here's more or less what we did" level, without naming names specifically endangering anyone). the executive's license to reveal is much less troubling to me than its license to conceal.

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:06 (eleven years ago) link

and the factor of "We can't say this exists in court, but psssst, we did THIS badass kill"?

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:12 (eleven years ago) link

they reveal and conceal in different places, always.

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:12 (eleven years ago) link

sure, i'm not saying that this bit is transparency is a great thing. it's obviously little more than horn-tooting.

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:15 (eleven years ago) link

http://imgur.com/a/1X9Hp

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 7 June 2012 22:46 (eleven years ago) link

I loled

crüt, Thursday, 7 June 2012 22:49 (eleven years ago) link

lol @ piss children

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 8 June 2012 00:20 (eleven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVCMetPr-uk

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 8 June 2012 03:09 (eleven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.