DJs post your mixes for download

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4682 of them)
Yeh I like me some beatmapper wizard, but sometimes when I press "NEXT" it throws everything slightly out and i need to reposition it all again.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 15:14 (eighteen years ago) link

i just drag the next track onto the score, cut off everything before a point where you can see/hear rhythm pattern starting and then enter a new BPM for it until i can see/hear it matching with the previous track adequately, then restore the track's intro if required. this takes around a minute or two of fiddling usually, unless parts of the track need to re-arranged, cut etc.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 15:18 (eighteen years ago) link

yair that's the original way of doing it stevem, and possibly more precise, if a bit fiddly. give beatmapper a go, it takes a while to get used to but it's pretty quick and effective.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 15:31 (eighteen years ago) link

downloaded droids first mix last night and the bit where these two combine:

(35:17) 8. Seefeel - Charlotte’s Mouth - Too Pure
(40:44) 9. µ-Ziq - The Wheel - Rephlex

made me happy this morning on the way to work. so thanks for that.

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 15:41 (eighteen years ago) link

give beatmapper a go, it takes a while to get used to but it's pretty quick and effective.

I FEAR CHANGE

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 15:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Nice one koogs - thats my favourite bit of that mix as well.

FWIW - all the mixes we put up on the blog are all good old fashioned live (mostly) vinyl mixing. Nuthin wrong with computers - but i do have my doubts about Acid though - the older versions used to do horrible things compression-wise...

droid, Tuesday, 7 March 2006 15:55 (eighteen years ago) link

been using acid since version one. v3 was a revelation. if only they offered ape / flac support. it'll only ever sound as good as your source material. i'm still waiting for stir to teach me the mysterious and magickal art of vinyl mixing, been waiting for about 15 years, my time must surely be near. *

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:11 (eighteen years ago) link

just out of curiosity, does this mean most of you are making these mixes on your computers? for some reason this makes me feel better about my vinyl mixing skills, as i just assumed you were all these incredible mixologists.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:25 (eighteen years ago) link

not sure about them up there ^ ^ ^ but i do, hence my "as i'm not a dj, does it count?" post up there.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:35 (eighteen years ago) link

my mix that I posted here was done by hand. hence the crap sound quality etc! recording from md to computer. I have another longer one which is in post production at the moment, ie, making up for recording from md to computer, not fixing errors or anything!

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I make a point of staying away from computer mixing - for mainly indefensible uber-nerd-anal-DJ type reasons...

droid, Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:40 (eighteen years ago) link

i'm not saying that any method is less valid than the other... i do stuff in ableton as well as vinyl stuff.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:42 (eighteen years ago) link

most of the mix i put up was done on a computer with a couple of records being mixed in too. i should point out that i have been mixing records since the late 80's so do know how to do it that way but i only have one working turntable which makes mixing with records at home a tad hard.

frenchbloke - i'll give you one lesson for every 1000 records of mine you alphabetise.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:44 (eighteen years ago) link

I think both are fine, though I definitely am dubious about people, or at least MOST people I've heard, using ableton for house/techno/minimal straight up, is there an actual advantage in what you can do besides beatmatch?

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:49 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, i'd be dubious about that too unless they were incorporating a lot of their own production into the set.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 16:59 (eighteen years ago) link

that's what Hawtin does these days right?

but surely there's an advantage over vinyl anyway in practical terms. if it's as easy/easier to work that way why not do a live set in one style entirely without vinyl?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:03 (eighteen years ago) link

chop things up, sometimes ridiculously so. and not have to get fingerprints over vinyl. i'd never use acid live - far too unpredictable, tho i did use v1 and v2 live at optimo many years ago. i'd fiddle with things as it played. (and subsequently hope the pc didn't crash). i've yet to play with ableton 5 and tracktion looks like some wacky cross between fl studio and acid and doesn't like my external sound machine, so it was uninstalled.

most ableton things i've heard sounded like a twitch wannabe (sorry stir) - whereas you can do allsorts in ableton, you can physically chop up the waveform onscreen and re-arrange it in acid 9and i daresay any similar program)( i re-jigged sxpress' hey music lover so that it played a slightly different tune for the xfm thing i did or you can go to extremes of chopping out every nth note and re-joining it to interesting results - turning 4/4 into 3/4 or 7/8 and what have you. takes bloody ages tho)

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:03 (eighteen years ago) link

i'd fiddle with things as it played. (and subsequently hope the pc didn't crash)

good god man...if Acid's no good for realtime mixing/cueing, how'd you manage?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:06 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't know, my primitive answer though would be (a) it doesn't feel as nice and (b) people aren't fully confident in the sound quality.

And maybe (c) ableton mixes just sound different or a possible (d) the temptation to blend tunes together seamlessly in the awful Sasha Involver way is very strong when using Ableton, who's going to use it and go "ok I mixed these two records now I stop". Of course this is where the argument gets weird cos it's almost like I'm arguing that the limitations of human mixing on decks are a positive thing when they limit those of us that are not creative enough and would use the limitless possibilites of Ableton in a limited way! Myself included but that's why I've not got Ableton yet, I don't believe I can produce! (not yet anyhow)

Some of the above are reasons and some are just my reservations, of course!

x-post it's meant to be good for re-edits though, which seems a slightly more universal use and one I'd be into.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link

hawtin uses final scratch so he's still mixing, it's just that he's mixing audio files rather than records.

x post

and ronan, it is wonderful for re edits (which is what i mainly use it for). what used to take me a day to do on a hardware sampler now takes an hour.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:11 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeh, I use Acid/Soundforge exclusively, mostly because it never started as "wow I wanna be a DJ", more "I want to make tapes for my mates without gaps in them and loads of cheeky segues and stuff". I'd love to learn vinyl mixing but that would mean buying decks and then shelling out for vinyl, of which I currently own little. Much easier to rip from CD or download the tracks and have fun mulching them all together. For me anyway. I guess it's a completely different art, especially seeing as Acid isn't realtime or anything.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:13 (eighteen years ago) link

hawtin uses final scratch so he's still mixing, it's just that he's mixing audio files rather than records.

sorry i thought that's what was meant re Albeton-only sets too - live mixing of uncompressed digital audio

fair point re 'too many cooks/over-egging' Ronan - the temptation is there for so many

what about just using a wav editor eg Sound Forge for making edits? what advantages would Abelton have over that?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:14 (eighteen years ago) link

stir, how much longer until you teach me the dark and mysterious vinyl magick ?

*

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:17 (eighteen years ago) link

i've never used soundforge so i don't know but the main advantage with using ableton is probably that you can fix timing errors. a lot of the things i play have live drums which don't stay in time and are VERY hard to mix so i'll start by fixing all them so they are rigidly in time. then i'll record the track into the sequencer side and start cutting and pasting sections, adding effects, re eq'ing and sometimes replace the kik drum or add an additional one.

but i guess it comes down to what you are familiar with. i know ableton inside out so that's all i use now.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Obligatory Ableton horror story...

I've been using Ableton in live settings, mainly for short sets, for about eight months. Recently I landed a couple of weekly residencies, one of which is geared towards more eclectic music programming. I decided to try Ableton for a full five hour night last Friday with disastrous results. About an hour into it, the program started randomly dropping out the sound. The dropouts ranged from microsecond glitches to 1 or 2 seconds of dead silence. Really embarrassing.

I bought Serato the next day, played at the club that night and had zero problems. knock. on. wood. Ableton has been relegated to the studio computer only.

I can speak from personal experience when I say that there's definitely a different energy with Ableton mixing in a live setting. The best way I can describe it is that the crowd > DJ feedback loop feels mediated by the computer. I don't get that feeling with Serato or Final Scratch though.

jeffery (jeffery), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:25 (eighteen years ago) link

dude played with us last week and used serato.

pretty much is the exact same as someone on the decks with real vinyl, as far as I could see.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:29 (eighteen years ago) link

The dropouts ranged from microsecond glitches to 1 or 2 seconds of dead silence.

that sounds like you need more ram. thankfully this has only happened to me once in recent memory and that was the other week in texas where there was so much bass vibration in the booth that my powerbook started freaking out. thankfully they were a very forgiving crowd.

there is a different energy from using ableton in a live setting which is why i use vinyl too but i think once you know your way round the software you learn little ways to make it sound, um, er, more jacking i guess is the best way to describe it.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link

i'm glad i don't dj. that and the fact i only have one turntable. and there's not much call to play daf 7" singles to the public

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link

so i'll start by fixing all them so they are rigidly in time

cool! do you do this by manually cutting and pasting bits of the wav/data? does Ableton quantize the file so you know where to reposition snares or whatever by looking as well as hearing?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link

ableton uses a thing called warp marking where the audio file is kind of fluid. you literally drag and move the beats one at a time until they are lined up with the grid of a rigidly in time 4/4 beat. i usually have a basic 4/4 beat playing along to check i have got it totally right audibly as well as visually. ableton 5 has a function that does this automatically but i find it a bit hit or miss and prefer to do it manually. i should point out that it is incredibly tedious to do but worth it for the results.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:39 (eighteen years ago) link

The process stir is talking about is explained here:
http://www.joshvon.com/tech/rock-solid-warping-101.htm

Someone posted this a while ago, I still had it in my history. It's sadly the only thing I know about mixing on ableton.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:42 (eighteen years ago) link

and here's what a warped file looks like. this was 'hallelujah' by can and required literally hundreds of beats to be moved about.

http://www.optimo.co.uk/hallelujah.jpg

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:44 (eighteen years ago) link

See folks, being a dj isn't all glamour.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:46 (eighteen years ago) link

xxpost

it sounds tedious... but handy! I'm surprised they haven't worked out a way to use Recycle! technology to basically learn and do it for you.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:47 (eighteen years ago) link

I've put in tracks and ableton has put the warp markers in the right place, but this has generally been 4/4 house/techno music with absolutely no deviations/bits where it breaks down throughout the whole track and where the 4/4 kick starts at the very beginning of the track. Other than that it seems to be really unreliable.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:50 (eighteen years ago) link

i spent the last year learning how to mix "the old fashioned way" with two records and a crossfader, andi'm quite the luddite when it comes to software. but all this shit sounds really interesting and is making me think i need to get on board...

most of the guys i know around here do entire sets in traktor. i tried it a few times but couldn't get used to "seeing" a track to cue it up as opposed to "hearing" it. abelton has hardware that you can do this with, right?

stir- when you were talking about "fixing" a track and replacing beats.. is this what i'm hearing during "kiss me again" on that mix of yours up at ourdisco? the way a dance beat lines up with it for 8 or 16 bars and then drops out... is that something you "fix" ahead of time, and not drop in live?

also- is that the hallelujah edit that was on beatsinspace over the summer?

grady (grady), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:54 (eighteen years ago) link

most of the guys i know around here do entire sets in traktor. i tried it a few times but couldn't get used to "seeing" a track to cue it up as opposed to "hearing" it. abelton has hardware that you can do this with, right?
You can listen ahead with traktor as easily as you can with vinyl. It works on the same principles except with the added luxury that you can skip back and forth to preset markers on the track. Only problem with traktor, which has stopped me ever playing out with it (they only way I could play out as I can't beatmatch with vinyl and I'm shit with ableton), is that there is a kind of snooty, elitist response to it because it's so simple to use.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:58 (eighteen years ago) link

yeh, didn't really understand Traktor, although i'd like to. As you say, it's almost so simple to use it destroys my brain!

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Stir, where were you playing in Texas?

jeffery (jeffery), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Other than that it seems to be really unreliable.

rubbish, it's the most reliable software i've ever used.

stir- when you were talking about "fixing" a track and replacing beats.. is this what i'm hearing during "kiss me again" on that mix of yours up at ourdisco? the way a dance beat lines up with it for 8 or 16 bars and then drops out... is that something you "fix" ahead of time, and not drop in live?

no, no. i would have added that on top live. i never pre prepare actual mixes. i meant i 'fixed' it so it stayed rigidly in time and when i say replacing beats, i more mean putting an additional kik or some sub bass on it so it 'kicks' a bit more than the original. as i play a lot of old records and new records, i have to do this as the production on the old records is so different that alongside the new ones they would sound a little weak over a soundsytem.

also- is that the hallelujah edit that was on beatsinspace over the summer?

i'm not sure but very possibly.

jeffrey, i played in austin two weeks ago.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Other than that it seems to be really unreliable.

rubbish, it's the most reliable software i've ever used.
It was in reference to its automatic warp marker setting.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:13 (eighteen years ago) link

oops, sorry. yes, you are totally right about that.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:14 (eighteen years ago) link

so "kiss me again" was "fixed" ahead of time so the drums were perfectly in time.... making it easier to line up the other dance beat under it... right?

grady (grady), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:14 (eighteen years ago) link

exactly. me not so great at explaining tings.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:15 (eighteen years ago) link

or answering phones *

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:22 (eighteen years ago) link

shut it frenchie. you always phone at the crack of dawn.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link

but it'd only be the crack of dawn if you were in the west coast of america, or is that your body's way of telling you to slow down? *

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 18:27 (eighteen years ago) link

You can listen ahead with traktor as easily as you can with vinyl. It works on the same principles except with the added luxury that you can skip back and forth to preset markers on the track.

this may sound horribly ignorant of me... but how do i do this with headphones if my computer only has one headphone jack....? do i need some kind of external hardware?

grady (grady), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:05 (eighteen years ago) link

that is EXACTLY what i was wondering - someone explain!

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:09 (eighteen years ago) link

you need a soundcard with multi outs. it's the only logical way this would work. ie 6 channels - 2 for 'deck 1'' 2 for 'deck 2' and 2/poss 1 for monitoring. you'd also need some way of mixing this which makes dj'ing with just your laptop unworkable with traktor. just your laptop, your external soundcard and your 8/10/12 channel mixing desk. mind you, i've never used it.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 20:42 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.