the most important election of your lifetime: 2012 american general election thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5607 of them)

plus his hair looks like really long extruded blackheads, which i guess goes without saying

contenderizer, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 04:43 (eleven years ago) link

lol that is a fantastically gross image, cheers

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 04:45 (eleven years ago) link

secret actual reason is his handwriting is really sloppy and he knows how hard you guys will judge him if you find out. tax returns look like a sloppy shopping list. makes him feel so sad to think about it

tallarico dreams (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 04:54 (eleven years ago) link

"We're accused, by the way - in our party - of being the party of the rich," Romney said. "And it's an awful moniker, because that's just not true. We're the party of people who want to get rich. And we're also the party of people who want to care to help people from getting poor. We want to help the poor.
"We also want to make sure people don't have to become poor," Romney said. "And we know what it takes to keep people from becoming poor."

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 07:27 (eleven years ago) link

blessed echos of Quayle

tallarico dreams (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 11:46 (eleven years ago) link

And we're also the party of people who want to care to help people from getting poor.

lol when he tries to talk abt helping people he can barely get the words out

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:04 (eleven years ago) link

"we don't quite care yet, but we really want to"

PITILESS LIVE SHOW (DJP), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:13 (eleven years ago) link

"we know what it takes to keep people from becoming poor."

money?

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:15 (eleven years ago) link

i think money is a metaphor for status, not resources

Mordy, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:18 (eleven years ago) link

what abt actual money

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:21 (eleven years ago) link

Heather C. McGhee ‏@hmcghee

Harry Reid: "17 angry old white men will wake up [in Nov] and realize they've just bought the country". Amen! Public financing now!

wow

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:22 (eleven years ago) link

what is actual money? like dollar bills?

Mordy, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:32 (eleven years ago) link

"Everybody needs money! That's why they call it money!"

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:34 (eleven years ago) link

Iatee's strategy for Romney, somewhat facetiously:

http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/105065/mitt-romney-crybaby-capitalist

clemenza, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:42 (eleven years ago) link

lol when he tries to talk abt helping people he can barely get the words out

No one is doubting that Obama's the more skillful liar.

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:46 (eleven years ago) link

i was thinking this morning that obama has made an economic critique of corporations + bain-style capitalism the cornerstone of his reelection platform. even if he is lying about everything he says, having the POTUS talk about this stuff is not nothing

possible zizek-style breakdown: talking about predatory economics instead of doing something about them just satisfies the urge for reform w/out committing to actual reform (regulatory + legal action) V. talking about predatory economics, even with the absence of meaningful action, still has a broad distilled effect throughout the culture + society. idk which is the right reading, but i suspect the second one is more important than it seems. it is at least a little heartening that obama feels like the country is annoyed enough with wall st that this critique will resonate.

Mordy, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:49 (eleven years ago) link

Serious questions: what would the effect be if he were to lose?

clemenza, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:52 (eleven years ago) link

Romney?

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:55 (eleven years ago) link

Obama 2012: Not Nothing

He talked about it in '08, then did essentially nothing about it, so where the fuck does that leave us? The rationalizations never end. xxp

what would the effect be if he were to lose?

Liberals finally march against Obama policies, as implemented by Romney.

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:56 (eleven years ago) link

what is actual money? like dollar bills?

― Mordy, Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:32 AM (49 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you know money you can use it to buy things, if youre poor and you get some youre not poor anymore

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:23 (eleven years ago) link

what would the effect be if he were to lose?

Liberals finally march against Obama policies, as implemented by Romney.
― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius)

give Morbs the otm he deserves here haters you know it is the right thing to do even if liberals marching will have the same effect on govt as liberals not marching

tallarico dreams (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:43 (eleven years ago) link

what is/was occupy ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? conservatives marching ??????????????????????????

max, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:44 (eleven years ago) link

iirc they were too lazy to march, mostly sat around in tents

hot sauce delivery device (mh), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:45 (eleven years ago) link

liberals!

hot sauce delivery device (mh), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:46 (eleven years ago) link

Liberals will probably, for reasons of solidarity or just effectiveness, march against the non-Obama Romney policies first, and save the Obama ones until after their will has been felt on those.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:47 (eleven years ago) link

liberals dont march, we prance

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:48 (eleven years ago) link

hoping all that liberal marching will keep death's door from closing on Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:48 (eleven years ago) link

easy solution: ruth bader ginsborg

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:50 (eleven years ago) link

Thought the New Yorker piece linked to above was a good round-up. I still think the first two possibilities--extremely high levels of income, more offshore accounts--aren't holding him up; they don't make him look good, but neither will they surprise anyone except those paying no attention whatsoever. The fourth is worse--a very, very low tax rate--but I think he can withstand that too, provided it's somewhere in the range that's already on record (13-15%). (Got a preview of one defense that will be used from Ed Gillespie or somebody on the weekend; he started asking the interviewer if he himself did whatever he could to minimize his taxes, then broadened that out to Obama. Not pretty, but I could see where that might neutralize the issue.) It'd linger in the background. The third, though--politically explosive investments--is my guess as to the problem, if there's indeed something there. Just looking at the medical-waste-disposal company that keeps popping up, if true, surely that would be toxic for Romney with his base. Very rough analogy: athletes who make millions in endorsement deals. Nobody complains much about the money, but they have gotten into some trouble over specific business practices of those companies.

clemenza, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:59 (eleven years ago) link

well that just got me a little more motivated

du. duplass. duplass mich. (goole), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:10 (eleven years ago) link

im skeptical he could get everyone to go along with but its a p amazing shift in sentiment that bodes well

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:11 (eleven years ago) link

what is/was occupy ????

Most 'liberals' -- I define them as ppl who vote Democrat without holding their nose -- I am acquainted with did not go to any OWS stuff, and think a la Alec Baldwin that OWS should propose legislation, join the Democrats, etc.

Even in breakout groups at OWS events I heard people saying "but of course a Republican Supreme Court would be a disaster."... I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:12 (eleven years ago) link

ha well isn't the summer campaign basically 'keep the internet people excited'?

xp

du. duplass. duplass mich. (goole), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:12 (eleven years ago) link

I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.I'm talking about fuck you, you fucking fuck Obama actions.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:13 (eleven years ago) link

fuckbye

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:14 (eleven years ago) link

yo when even OWS breakout groups are talking about how a repub supreme court would be worse maybe that's a sign that it's true?

Mordy, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:17 (eleven years ago) link

The expression is fuckitybye

sive gallus et mulier (Michael White), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:18 (eleven years ago) link

no it's a sign we're all fucked, and some grayhaired Obama stan doesn't know what radicalism is.

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:18 (eleven years ago) link

also that is your biggest foreheadclap post of all time, Mordy

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:19 (eleven years ago) link

u don't want to become so principled that u start spelling your name in lowercase and join the confederation of states

Mordy, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:19 (eleven years ago) link

you guys are doing it wrong

lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:19 (eleven years ago) link

aw c'mon guys President Romney picking a 40 year old version of Scalia to replace Ginsberg would not matter one whit

it's smdh time in America (will), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:20 (eleven years ago) link

i just think it's silly. obv it's true that a more fully republican stacked supreme court would be worse for more people in the united states than the current makeup. like self-evidently true i don't even know why you'd need a breakoff OWS group to learn that, and i don't know why once you've learnt that self-evident fact you'd instead complain that the OWS'ers aren't radical enough. u could say that it's true but it's doesn't matter bc x,y,z collapse of civilization anarchy revelation of real in moment of violent resistance etc. of course all those things would make things worse for more people too.

Mordy, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:21 (eleven years ago) link

I think where I differ the most from Morbs is that if Romney wins, liberals aren't going to get heard by anybody but other liberals for the foreseeable future, whether they march or not. It didn't matter in '68 and it will matter less so now. If Obama is a hypocrite for talking about change and progress and not delivering, a Romney victory will mean that change isn't coming, no-one cares and the press (and hence, the national ethos) will react accordingly.

sive gallus et mulier (Michael White), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:22 (eleven years ago) link

aw c'mon guys President Romney picking a 40 year old version of Scalia to replace Ginsberg would not matter one whit

― it's smdh time in America (will), Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:20 AM (56 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

how much is a 'whit'

du. duplass. duplass mich. (goole), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:22 (eleven years ago) link

supreme court appointments was the only reason i voted for gore over nader in 2000 ;_;

goodbye, youthful optimism

hot sauce delivery device (mh), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:24 (eleven years ago) link

I'm not talking about repeating '68. I'm talking about things that will never happen, I gave up in 1984, why the fuck am I on these threads, etc.

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:36 (eleven years ago) link

because you are a nihilistic political evangelist

PITILESS LIVE SHOW (DJP), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:37 (eleven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.