should ilxors be tempbanned for taking their beefs to other social media? (twitter/fbook/myspace/etc)?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1067 of them)

what boxall said

pandemic, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:21 (eleven years ago) link

I asked, a week ago, for Mordy to fucking stop. And he carried on. I finally just have enough, of the clusterfuck taking over every goddamn thread, and now he's trying to be all high and mighty "please stop" because I actually asked for my chance to tell my side of the story?

All I have wanted for the past week was for this to fucking stop, and yet ILX could not resist dragging it back up at every turn.

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:22 (eleven years ago) link

We're not allowed to talk shit about ILX beefs in private? x-post

― Melissa W, Thursday, October 18, 2012 4:20 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sure, but don't go on playing the victim about it

lil dirk (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:22 (eleven years ago) link

xp you shouldn't ascribe intentions to "ilx".

Arvo Pärt Chimp (Neil S), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:23 (eleven years ago) link

The clusterfuck just kept carrying on and carrying on

no it didn't, u were pretty much ignored until your friend caused it to be brought up on Monday. if u talk about someone publically on twitter as you were talking about mordy, they can talk about it here.

zvookster, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:23 (eleven years ago) link

I've already stated that I took my feed private bcz every time someone posts a link to it from here I get weird followers. The tweet is still there, I just don't like having to block ppl like Chaki and Whiney and Lagoon from trying to follow me bcz they think there's ~drama~ to be had, OK?

― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:58 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i take umbrage at being lumped in w/these known hooligans!

--bob marley (lag∞n), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:24 (eleven years ago) link

im sick of the hypocrisy in this thread

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:25 (eleven years ago) link

but this thread is going nowhere and we need to avoid pile-ons. The facts are out there folks but no sign of apologies which tbh is all thats needed.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:26 (eleven years ago) link

Apart from anything else, keeping frogbs concerned about poking his head out because someone is "constantly crying misogynist and mansplainer" is I hope a public good we can all agree on.

I just don't understand how someone can cause the exact same clusterfuck every month and then play victim afterwards.

frogbs, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:28 (eleven years ago) link

ok everyone this is ILX and ILX is not about personal sniping across social media platforms. ILX is about Taylor Swift records and Tarantino films and disgruntled left-winger hand wringing. It's about trucker hats and talking dinosaurs and having hot chicks in our beds after we play awesome metal shows. we need to remember why we all came together to share our ideas about UK Funky House and Velvet Underground minutiae and Drake. we need to remember that we hate pitchfork but read it religiously, and that we're not cool with Amanda Palmer. we need to remember why we are who we are. in the name of Aaliyah, we need to remember.

Legendary General Cypher Raige (Gukbe), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:28 (eleven years ago) link

amen

Arvo Pärt Chimp (Neil S), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:29 (eleven years ago) link

I stopped getting nasty emails about the Aaliyah death thread just a while ago actually.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:29 (eleven years ago) link

*checks email script*

--bob marley (lag∞n), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:30 (eleven years ago) link

People here have already formed their opinions about who I am, and what my motivations are. Some people are going to believe that I'm an awful person and should be burned at the stake no matter what I do. Some people are going to accept me as flawed but fully rounded human being. There's nothing I can say or do at this point to change anyone's opinion of me.

But when someone starts calling for me to be banned because they are either unable to tell "mansplainer" from their name, or because they just flat out lied, I have the right to call them out on it. People have been calling me out for real or imagined transgressions for the past week, it seems only fair.

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:31 (eleven years ago) link

(for the record, since I guess you mean me?)

u were pretty much ignored until your friend caused it to be brought up on Monday.

Odd friends she's keeping

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:33 (eleven years ago) link

I'll try that again

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:33 (eleven years ago) link

"Some people are going to believe that I'm an awful person and should be burned at the stake no matter what I do. Some people are going to accept me as flawed but fully rounded human being."

I smell a poll.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:33 (eleven years ago) link

Please don't. I'm serious.

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:35 (eleven years ago) link

There's nothing I can say or do at this point to change anyone's opinion of me.

not true! just be chill for a while.

frogbs, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:35 (eleven years ago) link

and stop making up things

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:36 (eleven years ago) link

There's nothing I can say or do at this point to change anyone's opinion of me.
... OK but remember 30 minutes ago when you said
I do not judge people by their words, I judge them by their actions.
'words' is going 'pfft haters gonna hate so whatever,' 'actions' would be you trying to post more respectfully, ppl's opinions might change.

boxall, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:36 (eleven years ago) link

WCC, if you seriously believe anyone thinks you are an awful person and should be burned at the stake then you probably need mental help. I suggest you close your browser, log off your computer and go get some.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:36 (eleven years ago) link

and you cant accuse me of being someone who hated you.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:36 (eleven years ago) link

alex i dont think thats being helpful

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:37 (eleven years ago) link

wcc was clearly joking

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:37 (eleven years ago) link

"I'm serious"

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:37 (eleven years ago) link

I think there's reasonable evidence for the first part of that, Alex, and the second is just hyperbole.

Also, now as always, fuck 'respectfully'.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:38 (eleven years ago) link

I say no but then again I haven't had an extracurricular beef with anyone. If I'm getting on somebody's nerves i try to just step away from the thread and give it some air. If you are having a debate w someone about a subject and the two of you disagree to the point where it's getting nasty, there's not really much point in pursuing it, as it's clear neither side is going to come to an agreement.

Btw is there any way to check if you've been sb'd?

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:39 (eleven years ago) link

i just read the "button" thread again. this whole thing turns on a technical question of whether a discussion of "willingly causing yourself to not exist" can/should include discussion of suicide, and/or whether a thread starter can dictate terms of a thread.

WCC told the thread that she started that, no, you can't talk about suicide here.

Mordy disregarded that (so did others, so did i!) and brought up "death of the author" and thread ownership, said he "disagreed" with WCC about what WCC's thread was even about. this is the "mansplaining" part.

and it devolved from there. i mean, that's it. does anyone dispute that?

the irony is that the discussion was pretty good before, during and after it got heated. and suicide continued to be discussed.

there is no dana, only (goole), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:39 (eleven years ago) link

should ilxors be banned at the stake for taking their beefs to other social media?

--bob marley (lag∞n), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:39 (eleven years ago) link

I'm serious = DO NOT START A POLL THREAD.

"Burned at the stake" is a metaphor. (Though I'm not so sure this is always the case, given some of the creeptastic hate mail I've had over the years.)

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:40 (eleven years ago) link

Tarantino filmes?

sorcery is in the gutter (how's life), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:40 (eleven years ago) link

btw i object the thread title implication that ilx is social media, like if u agree

--bob marley (lag∞n), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:42 (eleven years ago) link

most will be afraid to

--bob marley (lag∞n), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:42 (eleven years ago) link

AF, do you think k3vin k hates jon too? It's a message board for crying out loud. No one is that invested in anyone else as a "person". At worst I think you can argue people think WCC is an annoying poster.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:42 (eleven years ago) link

u were pretty much ignored until your friend caused it to be brought up on Monday.

Odd friends she's keeping

― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 18 October 2012

I'll try that again

― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 18 October 2012

yeah farrell i already posted what led to that

zvookster, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:43 (eleven years ago) link

for this rebeef much thanks

velko, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:44 (eleven years ago) link

Wrote this 30 minutes ago then chickened out on posting it, but fuck it:

I'm really uncomfortable with the idea that it's libelous to call someone a misogynist now (whether you agree with the appellation or not, it is not good to set any kind of precedent that disallows someone from calling out someone's misogyny/racism/etc. using the vocabulary available to them, ESPECIALLY when it is of the controversial or insidious type where a lot of people will deny that it could possibly be any kind of offensive). Calling someone a misogynist is an opinion, not an accusation of specific dastardly action and whether people think WCC "abuses" the term or not is not really relevant to the discussion.

Also, as someone who follows WCC on twitter, she really didn't mention Mordy by name until AFTER he brought up twitter on that other thread.

No comment on the rest of this.

Melissa W, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:44 (eleven years ago) link

i think if this question is always on your mind and you think "it's ok this is just an impossible hypothetical and i'm not actually contemplating suicide" you're basically fooling yourself that your mental state is better than it is.

("you" = impersonal, would have used "one" but it reads funny.)

― ledge, Friday, 12 October 2012 13:51 (6 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Burn ledge!

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:46 (eleven years ago) link

yeah farrell i already posted what led to that

― zvookster, Thursday, 18 October 2012 21:43 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No no that's cool, I thought I was being called out on something - I have I think been mostly reactive on this?

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:47 (eleven years ago) link

FTR I am sorry I said you were being asshole earlier. That might have been a little harsh.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:48 (eleven years ago) link

I'm not surprised people get offended when they're accused of having a conscious or subconscious hatred of all women.

Legendary General Cypher Raige (Gukbe), Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:49 (eleven years ago) link

why "fuck 'respectfully', now as always", if you don't mind my asking? xxp

boxall, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:49 (eleven years ago) link

farrell, yeah i mixed u up with scik when first recalling that

zvookster, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:49 (eleven years ago) link

she really didn't mention Mordy by name until AFTER he brought up twitter on that other thread.

so what really? she was talking about him there, he talked about her talking about him here, and she doubled down.

zvookster, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:50 (eleven years ago) link

If we're going to talk about timelines: this was the first thing I read after a weekend away from ILX. What I thought was going to be a jokey piss-take thread laughing at indie-rock because that's never not funny. And this is clearly Mordy's idea of leaving sleeping dogs lie:

@hateindierock - opposed to the bourgeois selfish privilege orgy that is modern corporate youth culture worldwide

This was when I tweeted the "I see you're still reading my twitter you creep" tweet, because he was still bringing it up on unrelated threads, and trying to round up beef. And given he was, indeed, still reading my twitter looking for beef, as proved by his taking that quote and posting it, I felt kinda vindicated tweeting it.

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:52 (eleven years ago) link

Calling someone a misogynist is an opinion, not an accusation of specific dastardly action and whether people think WCC "abuses" the term or not is not really relevant to the discussion.

Maybe this is just my bropinion but it's kind of a hurtful thing to say, especially when gender issues were basically nowhere to be found on the original argument

frogbs, Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:54 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.